与患有严重精神疾病的人合作并为他们提供体育活动干预——太空故事

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health Pub Date : 2023-01-08 DOI:10.1080/2159676X.2022.2161610
L. Walker, Sam Dawson, Samantha Brady, Emily Hillison, Michelle Horspool, Gareth Jones, Ellie Wildbore, E. Peckham
{"title":"与患有严重精神疾病的人合作并为他们提供体育活动干预——太空故事","authors":"L. Walker, Sam Dawson, Samantha Brady, Emily Hillison, Michelle Horspool, Gareth Jones, Ellie Wildbore, E. Peckham","doi":"10.1080/2159676X.2022.2161610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT SPACES (Supporting Physical Activity through Co-production in people with Severe Mental Illness) is a study which aims to develop an intervention to increase physical activity created with and for people with severe mental ill health (SMI), their carers and professionals involved in physical activity and/or severe mental ill health. People with SMI are less physically active than the general population and have an increased likelihood of experiencing long-term physical health conditions such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, diabetes and obesity. The SPACES team employed a comprehensive process of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) work embedded within a co-production strategy. Researchers worked together from the point of inception with people with lived experience, two of whom became co-applicants, to design and carry out the intervention development stage of the study. This included PPIE work and an iterative process of focus groups and interviews with various stakeholders and a consensus group made up of multiple stakeholders with lived, caring and professional experience. Here, we describe the co-production model we used, the benefits, challenges, achievements and areas for learning and improvement. We offer co-production principles and practical strategy, which we hope will be used, modified, personalised and built on by others. We also offer the idea that laying out the co-production strategy to be employed prior to a study commencing and then comparing how that strategy was or was not met could be a step towards creating more accountability and academic rigour in co-production.","PeriodicalId":48542,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"235 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-producing a physical activity intervention with and for people with severe mental ill health – the spaces story\",\"authors\":\"L. Walker, Sam Dawson, Samantha Brady, Emily Hillison, Michelle Horspool, Gareth Jones, Ellie Wildbore, E. Peckham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2159676X.2022.2161610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT SPACES (Supporting Physical Activity through Co-production in people with Severe Mental Illness) is a study which aims to develop an intervention to increase physical activity created with and for people with severe mental ill health (SMI), their carers and professionals involved in physical activity and/or severe mental ill health. People with SMI are less physically active than the general population and have an increased likelihood of experiencing long-term physical health conditions such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, diabetes and obesity. The SPACES team employed a comprehensive process of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) work embedded within a co-production strategy. Researchers worked together from the point of inception with people with lived experience, two of whom became co-applicants, to design and carry out the intervention development stage of the study. This included PPIE work and an iterative process of focus groups and interviews with various stakeholders and a consensus group made up of multiple stakeholders with lived, caring and professional experience. Here, we describe the co-production model we used, the benefits, challenges, achievements and areas for learning and improvement. We offer co-production principles and practical strategy, which we hope will be used, modified, personalised and built on by others. We also offer the idea that laying out the co-production strategy to be employed prior to a study commencing and then comparing how that strategy was or was not met could be a step towards creating more accountability and academic rigour in co-production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2161610\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2161610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要空间(通过合作支持严重精神疾病患者的体育活动)是一项研究,旨在开发一种干预措施,以增加与严重精神疾病(SMI)患者、他们的护理人员和参与体育活动和/或严重精神疾病健康的专业人员共同创造的体育活动。SMI患者的体力活动比普通人群少,并且经历心血管和呼吸系统疾病、糖尿病和肥胖等长期身体健康状况的可能性增加。SPACES团队采用了一个包含在联合制作战略中的患者和公众参与和参与(PPIE)工作的综合流程。研究人员从一开始就与有生活经验的人合作,其中两人成为共同申请人,设计并实施研究的干预发展阶段。这包括PPIE工作和焦点小组的迭代过程,以及对各种利益相关者的采访,以及由具有生活、关爱和专业经验的多个利益相关者组成的共识小组。在这里,我们描述了我们使用的合作生产模式、好处、挑战、成就以及学习和改进的领域。我们提供合拍原则和实用策略,我们希望这些原则和策略能被其他人使用、修改、个性化和建立。我们还提出了这样一个想法,即在研究开始之前制定要采用的合作制作战略,然后比较如何实现或没有实现该战略,这可能是朝着在合作制作中创造更多问责制和学术严谨性迈出的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-producing a physical activity intervention with and for people with severe mental ill health – the spaces story
ABSTRACT SPACES (Supporting Physical Activity through Co-production in people with Severe Mental Illness) is a study which aims to develop an intervention to increase physical activity created with and for people with severe mental ill health (SMI), their carers and professionals involved in physical activity and/or severe mental ill health. People with SMI are less physically active than the general population and have an increased likelihood of experiencing long-term physical health conditions such as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, diabetes and obesity. The SPACES team employed a comprehensive process of Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) work embedded within a co-production strategy. Researchers worked together from the point of inception with people with lived experience, two of whom became co-applicants, to design and carry out the intervention development stage of the study. This included PPIE work and an iterative process of focus groups and interviews with various stakeholders and a consensus group made up of multiple stakeholders with lived, caring and professional experience. Here, we describe the co-production model we used, the benefits, challenges, achievements and areas for learning and improvement. We offer co-production principles and practical strategy, which we hope will be used, modified, personalised and built on by others. We also offer the idea that laying out the co-production strategy to be employed prior to a study commencing and then comparing how that strategy was or was not met could be a step towards creating more accountability and academic rigour in co-production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Stories of acceptance and resistance: illness identity construction in athletes (mis)diagnosed with a personality disorder ‘I’m not the police’: practical strategies for sport coach mentors to develop trust and trustworthiness Building bridges: a Qualitative exploration of the athlete – guide partnership in high-performance parasport You wouldn’t let your phone run out of battery: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of male professional football coaches’ well-being Whiteness, Canadian university athletic administration, and anti-racism leadership: ‘A bunch of white haired, white dudes in the back rooms’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1