F. TirottaChristopher, G. LagueruelaRichard, M. Danielle, Irizarry Marysory, McBride John, Ramsingh Davinder, H. Jonathan
{"title":"静脉导管空气负荷的前瞻性观察研究:增加患者暴露的因素","authors":"F. TirottaChristopher, G. LagueruelaRichard, M. Danielle, Irizarry Marysory, McBride John, Ramsingh Davinder, H. Jonathan","doi":"10.23937/2377-4630/1410092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims: The purpose of this investigation was to identify causes and triggers of air entrainment related to intravenous (IV) access in a setting of clinical, operative or interventional procedure. Methods: An observational prospective trial was conducted in operating room settings across multiple study sites. A total of 120 surgical patients undergoing a variety of interventional and surgical procedures were included, representing multiple patient populations, case types and anesthesia setups. The ClearLine IV, a device that detects and removes air from IV tubing, was inserted into the IV circuit. Clinicians followed standard protocols. Blood warmers were used at the practitioner’s discretion. IV fluid was administered at a constant flow rate or through a bolus given over 30-60 seconds per standard of care. The volume and duration of fluid administration was recorded, along with the frequency, duration and amount of air captured by ClearLine IV. Results: Data confirmed a 52% probability of having air in the IV tubing, 79% when using a fluid warmer or bolus, and for every 10 mL of blood products administered, the risk increased by 0.5%. The baseline probability of dense air (defined as greater than 1000 μL per L of fluid) increased from 0% to 20% with the inclusion of a syringe setup, and up to 50% with a warmer or bolus. Conclusion: Air entrainment occurs in the presence of an IV in the hospital setting, and air burden, the amount of air captured, is increased by use of a fluid warmer, administration of medication by bolus, delivery of blood products, and inclusion of IV syringe setups. CLInICaL STuDy SuMMaRy","PeriodicalId":90855,"journal":{"name":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Observational Study of Air Burden in Intravenous Tubing: Factors that Increase Patient Exposure\",\"authors\":\"F. TirottaChristopher, G. LagueruelaRichard, M. Danielle, Irizarry Marysory, McBride John, Ramsingh Davinder, H. Jonathan\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2377-4630/1410092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Aims: The purpose of this investigation was to identify causes and triggers of air entrainment related to intravenous (IV) access in a setting of clinical, operative or interventional procedure. Methods: An observational prospective trial was conducted in operating room settings across multiple study sites. A total of 120 surgical patients undergoing a variety of interventional and surgical procedures were included, representing multiple patient populations, case types and anesthesia setups. The ClearLine IV, a device that detects and removes air from IV tubing, was inserted into the IV circuit. Clinicians followed standard protocols. Blood warmers were used at the practitioner’s discretion. IV fluid was administered at a constant flow rate or through a bolus given over 30-60 seconds per standard of care. The volume and duration of fluid administration was recorded, along with the frequency, duration and amount of air captured by ClearLine IV. Results: Data confirmed a 52% probability of having air in the IV tubing, 79% when using a fluid warmer or bolus, and for every 10 mL of blood products administered, the risk increased by 0.5%. The baseline probability of dense air (defined as greater than 1000 μL per L of fluid) increased from 0% to 20% with the inclusion of a syringe setup, and up to 50% with a warmer or bolus. Conclusion: Air entrainment occurs in the presence of an IV in the hospital setting, and air burden, the amount of air captured, is increased by use of a fluid warmer, administration of medication by bolus, delivery of blood products, and inclusion of IV syringe setups. CLInICaL STuDy SuMMaRy\",\"PeriodicalId\":90855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:本研究的目的是确定临床、手术或介入程序中与静脉(IV)入路相关的空气夹带的原因和触发因素。方法:在多个研究地点的手术室环境中进行观察性前瞻性试验。共有120名手术患者接受了各种介入和手术,代表了多种患者群体、病例类型和麻醉设置。ClearLine IV是一种检测和清除IV管道中空气的设备,被插入IV回路。临床医生遵循标准方案。暖血器的使用由医生自行决定。静脉输液以恒定流速给药或通过每次标准护理30-60秒的推注给药。记录液体给药的体积和持续时间,以及ClearLine IV捕获的空气的频率、持续时间和量。结果:数据证实,静脉导管中有空气的概率为52%,使用液体加温器或推注时为79%,每给药10mL血液制品,风险增加了0.5%。在包括注射器设置的情况下,浓空气(定义为每升液体大于1000μL)的基线概率从0%增加到20%,在加热器或推注的情况下增加到50%。结论:在医院环境中,当静脉注射时会发生空气夹带,通过使用液体加温器、推注给药、输送血液制品和静脉注射注射器,空气负荷(即捕获的空气量)会增加。CLInICaL STuDy SuMMaRy
A Prospective Observational Study of Air Burden in Intravenous Tubing: Factors that Increase Patient Exposure
Background/Aims: The purpose of this investigation was to identify causes and triggers of air entrainment related to intravenous (IV) access in a setting of clinical, operative or interventional procedure. Methods: An observational prospective trial was conducted in operating room settings across multiple study sites. A total of 120 surgical patients undergoing a variety of interventional and surgical procedures were included, representing multiple patient populations, case types and anesthesia setups. The ClearLine IV, a device that detects and removes air from IV tubing, was inserted into the IV circuit. Clinicians followed standard protocols. Blood warmers were used at the practitioner’s discretion. IV fluid was administered at a constant flow rate or through a bolus given over 30-60 seconds per standard of care. The volume and duration of fluid administration was recorded, along with the frequency, duration and amount of air captured by ClearLine IV. Results: Data confirmed a 52% probability of having air in the IV tubing, 79% when using a fluid warmer or bolus, and for every 10 mL of blood products administered, the risk increased by 0.5%. The baseline probability of dense air (defined as greater than 1000 μL per L of fluid) increased from 0% to 20% with the inclusion of a syringe setup, and up to 50% with a warmer or bolus. Conclusion: Air entrainment occurs in the presence of an IV in the hospital setting, and air burden, the amount of air captured, is increased by use of a fluid warmer, administration of medication by bolus, delivery of blood products, and inclusion of IV syringe setups. CLInICaL STuDy SuMMaRy