食品质量计划和净价格溢价是否同时存在?

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization Pub Date : 2020-12-03 DOI:10.1515/jafio-2019-0044
S. Monier‐Dilhan, T. Poméon, Michael Böhm, R. Brečić, P. Csillag, M. Donati, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, Apichaya Lilavanichakul, E. Majewski, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, Kallirroi Nikolaou, I. Papadopoulos, S. Pascucci, J. Peerlings, B. Ristić, K. Steinnes, Žaklina Stojanović, M. Tomić Maksan, Á. Török, M. Veneziani, G. Vittersø, V. Bellassen
{"title":"食品质量计划和净价格溢价是否同时存在?","authors":"S. Monier‐Dilhan, T. Poméon, Michael Böhm, R. Brečić, P. Csillag, M. Donati, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, Apichaya Lilavanichakul, E. Majewski, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, Kallirroi Nikolaou, I. Papadopoulos, S. Pascucci, J. Peerlings, B. Ristić, K. Steinnes, Žaklina Stojanović, M. Tomić Maksan, Á. Török, M. Veneziani, G. Vittersø, V. Bellassen","doi":"10.1515/jafio-2019-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article addresses the issue of the profitability of Food Quality Scheme (FQS) products as compared to reference products, which are defined as analogous products without quality label. We approach this question by taking into account the level of the value chain (upstream, processing, and downstream), the sector (vegetal, animal, seafood) and the type of FQS (PGI, PDO, Organic). We collected original data for several products produced in selected European countries, as well as in Thailand and Vietnam. Comparisons depending on value chain level, sector and FQS are possible by using two comparable indicators: price premium and net price premium (including cost differential). The following principal conclusions were reached: 1) Price is higher for FQS products than for the reference products, regardless of the production level, the type of FQS or the sector; 2) Price premiums generated by FQS do not differ along the value chain, nor between sectors (vegetal, animal or seafood/fish); 3) Price premium for organic products is significantly higher than for PGI products, and this conclusion holds at upstream and processing levels, taking into account the costs directly related to production; 4) All organic products and almost all PDO and PGI products analysed benefit from a positive quality rent; 5) At upstream level and processing level, the relative weight of intermediate consumption in the cost structure is lower for organic products than for reference products.","PeriodicalId":52541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jafio-2019-0044","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Food Quality Schemes and Net Price Premiums Go Together?\",\"authors\":\"S. Monier‐Dilhan, T. Poméon, Michael Böhm, R. Brečić, P. Csillag, M. Donati, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, Apichaya Lilavanichakul, E. Majewski, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, Kallirroi Nikolaou, I. Papadopoulos, S. Pascucci, J. Peerlings, B. Ristić, K. Steinnes, Žaklina Stojanović, M. Tomić Maksan, Á. Török, M. Veneziani, G. Vittersø, V. Bellassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jafio-2019-0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article addresses the issue of the profitability of Food Quality Scheme (FQS) products as compared to reference products, which are defined as analogous products without quality label. We approach this question by taking into account the level of the value chain (upstream, processing, and downstream), the sector (vegetal, animal, seafood) and the type of FQS (PGI, PDO, Organic). We collected original data for several products produced in selected European countries, as well as in Thailand and Vietnam. Comparisons depending on value chain level, sector and FQS are possible by using two comparable indicators: price premium and net price premium (including cost differential). The following principal conclusions were reached: 1) Price is higher for FQS products than for the reference products, regardless of the production level, the type of FQS or the sector; 2) Price premiums generated by FQS do not differ along the value chain, nor between sectors (vegetal, animal or seafood/fish); 3) Price premium for organic products is significantly higher than for PGI products, and this conclusion holds at upstream and processing levels, taking into account the costs directly related to production; 4) All organic products and almost all PDO and PGI products analysed benefit from a positive quality rent; 5) At upstream level and processing level, the relative weight of intermediate consumption in the cost structure is lower for organic products than for reference products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jafio-2019-0044\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2019-0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2019-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要本文讨论了食品质量计划(FQS)产品与参考产品相比的盈利能力问题,参考产品被定义为没有质量标签的类似产品。我们通过考虑价值链的水平(上游、加工和下游)、行业(植物、动物、海鲜)和FQS的类型(PGI、PDO、有机)来处理这个问题。我们收集了在选定的欧洲国家以及泰国和越南生产的几种产品的原始数据。通过使用两个可比指标:价格溢价和净价格溢价(包括成本差异),可以根据价值链水平、行业和FQS进行比较。得出以下主要结论:1)无论生产水平、FQS类型或行业如何,FQS产品的价格都高于参考产品;2) FQS产生的价格溢价在价值链上没有差异,在不同行业(植物、动物或海鲜/鱼类)之间也没有差异;3) 有机产品的价格溢价明显高于PGI产品,考虑到与生产直接相关的成本,这一结论在上游和加工层面成立;4) 所有有机产品以及几乎所有分析的PDO和PGI产品都受益于正的质量租金;5) 在上游层面和加工层面,有机产品的中间消费在成本结构中的相对权重低于参考产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Food Quality Schemes and Net Price Premiums Go Together?
Abstract This article addresses the issue of the profitability of Food Quality Scheme (FQS) products as compared to reference products, which are defined as analogous products without quality label. We approach this question by taking into account the level of the value chain (upstream, processing, and downstream), the sector (vegetal, animal, seafood) and the type of FQS (PGI, PDO, Organic). We collected original data for several products produced in selected European countries, as well as in Thailand and Vietnam. Comparisons depending on value chain level, sector and FQS are possible by using two comparable indicators: price premium and net price premium (including cost differential). The following principal conclusions were reached: 1) Price is higher for FQS products than for the reference products, regardless of the production level, the type of FQS or the sector; 2) Price premiums generated by FQS do not differ along the value chain, nor between sectors (vegetal, animal or seafood/fish); 3) Price premium for organic products is significantly higher than for PGI products, and this conclusion holds at upstream and processing levels, taking into account the costs directly related to production; 4) All organic products and almost all PDO and PGI products analysed benefit from a positive quality rent; 5) At upstream level and processing level, the relative weight of intermediate consumption in the cost structure is lower for organic products than for reference products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization
Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization (JAFIO) is a unique forum for empirical and theoretical research in industrial organization with a special focus on agricultural and food industries worldwide. As concentration, industrialization, and globalization continue to reshape horizontal and vertical relationships within the food supply chain, agricultural economists are revising both their views of traditional markets as well as their tools of analysis. At the core of this revision are strategic interactions between principals and agents, strategic interdependence between rival firms, and strategic trade policy between competing nations, all in a setting plagued by incomplete and/or imperfect information structures. Add to that biotechnology, electronic commerce, as well as the shift in focus from raw agricultural commodities to branded products, and the conclusion is that a "new" agricultural economics is needed for an increasingly complex "new" agriculture.
期刊最新文献
Implementing Antitrust Regulations in Dynamic Industries: The Case of the U.S. Cottonseed Industry Pandemic Produce: Impacts of COVID-19 on Florida’s Fruit and Vegetable Industries The Impact of COVID-19 on World Oil Producers: Time is Important COVID-19 Impacts on United States Crawfish Impacts of COVID-19 on U.S. Seafood Availability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1