空间数据缺失的一种解:公共相关效应估计量

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES International Regional Science Review Pub Date : 2020-09-22 DOI:10.1177/0160017620959132
M. Beenstock, D. Felsenstein
{"title":"空间数据缺失的一种解:公共相关效应估计量","authors":"M. Beenstock, D. Felsenstein","doi":"10.1177/0160017620959132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Informed regional policy needs good regional data. As regional data series for key economic variables are generally absent whereas national-level time series data for the same variables are ubiquitous, we suggest an approach that leverages this advantage. We hypothesize the existence of a pervasive “common factor” represented by the national time series that affects regions differentially. We provide an empirical illustration in which national FDI is used in place of panel data for FDI, which are absent. The proposed methodology is tested empirically with respect to the determinants of regional demand for housing. We use a quasi-experimental approach to compare the results of a “common correlated effects” (CCE) estimator with a benchmark case when absent regional data are omitted. Using three common factors relating to national population, income and housing stock, we find mixed support for the common correlated effects hypothesis. We conclude by discussing how our experimental design may serve as a methodological prototype for further tests of CCE as a solution to the absent spatial data problem.","PeriodicalId":51507,"journal":{"name":"International Regional Science Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"466 - 484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0160017620959132","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Solution for Absent Spatial Data: The Common Correlated Effects Estimator\",\"authors\":\"M. Beenstock, D. Felsenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0160017620959132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Informed regional policy needs good regional data. As regional data series for key economic variables are generally absent whereas national-level time series data for the same variables are ubiquitous, we suggest an approach that leverages this advantage. We hypothesize the existence of a pervasive “common factor” represented by the national time series that affects regions differentially. We provide an empirical illustration in which national FDI is used in place of panel data for FDI, which are absent. The proposed methodology is tested empirically with respect to the determinants of regional demand for housing. We use a quasi-experimental approach to compare the results of a “common correlated effects” (CCE) estimator with a benchmark case when absent regional data are omitted. Using three common factors relating to national population, income and housing stock, we find mixed support for the common correlated effects hypothesis. We conclude by discussing how our experimental design may serve as a methodological prototype for further tests of CCE as a solution to the absent spatial data problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Regional Science Review\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"466 - 484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0160017620959132\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Regional Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620959132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Regional Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620959132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

知情的区域政策需要良好的区域数据。由于关键经济变量的区域数据序列通常不存在,而相同变量的国家级时间序列数据普遍存在,我们建议采用一种利用这一优势的方法。我们假设存在一个普遍的“共同因素”,以国家时间序列为代表,对地区产生不同的影响。我们提供了一个实证说明,其中使用国家外国直接投资来代替没有的外国直接投资面板数据。根据区域住房需求的决定因素对所提出的方法进行了实证检验。当省略了缺失的区域数据时,我们使用准实验方法将“共同相关效应”(CCE)估计器的结果与基准情况进行比较。利用与国民人口、收入和住房存量相关的三个共同因素,我们发现共同相关效应假说得到了混合支持。最后,我们讨论了我们的实验设计如何作为CCE的进一步测试的方法原型,以解决缺乏空间数据的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Solution for Absent Spatial Data: The Common Correlated Effects Estimator
Informed regional policy needs good regional data. As regional data series for key economic variables are generally absent whereas national-level time series data for the same variables are ubiquitous, we suggest an approach that leverages this advantage. We hypothesize the existence of a pervasive “common factor” represented by the national time series that affects regions differentially. We provide an empirical illustration in which national FDI is used in place of panel data for FDI, which are absent. The proposed methodology is tested empirically with respect to the determinants of regional demand for housing. We use a quasi-experimental approach to compare the results of a “common correlated effects” (CCE) estimator with a benchmark case when absent regional data are omitted. Using three common factors relating to national population, income and housing stock, we find mixed support for the common correlated effects hypothesis. We conclude by discussing how our experimental design may serve as a methodological prototype for further tests of CCE as a solution to the absent spatial data problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
13.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: International Regional Science Review serves as an international forum for economists, geographers, planners, and other social scientists to share important research findings and methodological breakthroughs. The journal serves as a catalyst for improving spatial and regional analysis within the social sciences and stimulating communication among the disciplines. IRSR deliberately helps define regional science by publishing key interdisciplinary survey articles that summarize and evaluate previous research and identify fruitful research directions. Focusing on issues of theory, method, and public policy where the spatial or regional dimension is central, IRSR strives to promote useful scholarly research that is securely tied to the real world.
期刊最新文献
A Spatial Econometric Analysis of Productivity Variations Across US Cities Neighborhood Food Accessibility and Health Disparity: Examining the Impact of COVID-19 Using Spatial Models The Long Shadow of a Major Disaster: Modeled Dynamic Impacts of the Hypothetical HayWired Earthquake on California’s Economy A Review of the Literature About Broadband Internet Connections and Rural Development (1995-2022) Regional Implications of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1