无处可去?在新冠肺炎大流行背景下,老年人重新思考社交空间的意义

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101167
Katariina Tuominen , Jari Pirhonen , Kirsi Lumme-Sandt , Päivi Ahosola , Ilkka Pietilä
{"title":"无处可去?在新冠肺炎大流行背景下,老年人重新思考社交空间的意义","authors":"Katariina Tuominen ,&nbsp;Jari Pirhonen ,&nbsp;Kirsi Lumme-Sandt ,&nbsp;Päivi Ahosola ,&nbsp;Ilkka Pietilä","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Under COVID-19 restrictions, older people were advised to avoid social contact and to self-isolate at home. The situation forced them to reconsider their everyday social spaces such as home and leisure time places. This study approached the meaning of social spaces for older people by examining how older people positioned themselves in relation to social spaces during the pandemic. The data were drawn from the Ageing and social well-being (SoWell) research project at Tampere University, Finland, and they consisted of phone interviews collected during the summer of 2020 with 31 older persons aged 64–96 years. The data were analysed using the frameworks of positioning analysis and environmental positioning. Results showed the positions of older people being manifold, flexible and even contradictory. Within home, the participants portrayed themselves as restricted due to limited social contact, but also as able to adapt to and content being alone. Virtual spaces were depicted as spaces for younger and healthy persons, and the participants themselves as sceptical technology users not satisfied with technology-mediated interaction. Within an assisted living facility, the participants described themselves as sensible and responsible persons who wanted to follow the facility's pandemic-related rules but also as independent persons having nothing to do with these rules. In the spaces outside the home, the participants portrayed themselves as persons who followed pandemic instructions but also as persons who were not required to follow the instructions because they could use their own judgement. These self-positions shed light on the social needs of older people in the spaces of their everyday lives. Our results provide useful insights for policy makers and professionals working with older people and will help to promote spaces of living, care and everyday life that can enhance and maintain social interaction and well-being both in times of change and in more stable times.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No place to go? Older people reconsidering the meaning of social spaces in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Katariina Tuominen ,&nbsp;Jari Pirhonen ,&nbsp;Kirsi Lumme-Sandt ,&nbsp;Päivi Ahosola ,&nbsp;Ilkka Pietilä\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Under COVID-19 restrictions, older people were advised to avoid social contact and to self-isolate at home. The situation forced them to reconsider their everyday social spaces such as home and leisure time places. This study approached the meaning of social spaces for older people by examining how older people positioned themselves in relation to social spaces during the pandemic. The data were drawn from the Ageing and social well-being (SoWell) research project at Tampere University, Finland, and they consisted of phone interviews collected during the summer of 2020 with 31 older persons aged 64–96 years. The data were analysed using the frameworks of positioning analysis and environmental positioning. Results showed the positions of older people being manifold, flexible and even contradictory. Within home, the participants portrayed themselves as restricted due to limited social contact, but also as able to adapt to and content being alone. Virtual spaces were depicted as spaces for younger and healthy persons, and the participants themselves as sceptical technology users not satisfied with technology-mediated interaction. Within an assisted living facility, the participants described themselves as sensible and responsible persons who wanted to follow the facility's pandemic-related rules but also as independent persons having nothing to do with these rules. In the spaces outside the home, the participants portrayed themselves as persons who followed pandemic instructions but also as persons who were not required to follow the instructions because they could use their own judgement. These self-positions shed light on the social needs of older people in the spaces of their everyday lives. Our results provide useful insights for policy makers and professionals working with older people and will help to promote spaces of living, care and everyday life that can enhance and maintain social interaction and well-being both in times of change and in more stable times.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging Studies\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406523000683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406523000683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据新冠肺炎限制措施,建议老年人避免社交接触,在家自我安慰。这种情况迫使他们重新考虑自己的日常社交空间,如家庭和休闲场所。这项研究通过研究老年人在疫情期间如何定位自己与社交空间的关系,探讨了社交空间对老年人的意义。这些数据来自芬兰坦佩雷大学的老龄化与社会福利(SoWell)研究项目,包括2020年夏天对31名64-96岁的老年人进行的电话采访。使用定位分析和环境定位框架对数据进行了分析。结果显示,老年人的立场是多方面的、灵活的,甚至是矛盾的。在家里,参与者将自己描绘成由于社交接触有限而受到限制的人,但也能够适应并满足于独处。虚拟空间被描述为年轻人和健康人的空间,参与者本身是对技术中介互动不满意的持怀疑态度的技术用户。在辅助生活设施内,参与者称自己是明智和负责任的人,希望遵守该设施的疫情相关规则,但也是与这些规则无关的独立人士。在家外的空间里,参与者将自己描绘成遵循疫情指示的人,但也不需要遵循指示,因为他们可以使用自己的判断。这些自我定位揭示了老年人在日常生活中的社会需求。我们的研究结果为政策制定者和从事老年人工作的专业人员提供了有用的见解,并将有助于促进生活、护理和日常生活的空间,从而在变化时期和更稳定的时期增强和保持社会互动和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No place to go? Older people reconsidering the meaning of social spaces in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Under COVID-19 restrictions, older people were advised to avoid social contact and to self-isolate at home. The situation forced them to reconsider their everyday social spaces such as home and leisure time places. This study approached the meaning of social spaces for older people by examining how older people positioned themselves in relation to social spaces during the pandemic. The data were drawn from the Ageing and social well-being (SoWell) research project at Tampere University, Finland, and they consisted of phone interviews collected during the summer of 2020 with 31 older persons aged 64–96 years. The data were analysed using the frameworks of positioning analysis and environmental positioning. Results showed the positions of older people being manifold, flexible and even contradictory. Within home, the participants portrayed themselves as restricted due to limited social contact, but also as able to adapt to and content being alone. Virtual spaces were depicted as spaces for younger and healthy persons, and the participants themselves as sceptical technology users not satisfied with technology-mediated interaction. Within an assisted living facility, the participants described themselves as sensible and responsible persons who wanted to follow the facility's pandemic-related rules but also as independent persons having nothing to do with these rules. In the spaces outside the home, the participants portrayed themselves as persons who followed pandemic instructions but also as persons who were not required to follow the instructions because they could use their own judgement. These self-positions shed light on the social needs of older people in the spaces of their everyday lives. Our results provide useful insights for policy makers and professionals working with older people and will help to promote spaces of living, care and everyday life that can enhance and maintain social interaction and well-being both in times of change and in more stable times.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Aging together-with: The growing older of humans, non-humans and more-than-humans. A commentary Hidden in plain sight: Women and gendered dementia dynamics in the Australian Aged Care Royal Commission Four modes of embodiment in later life “Aging well” in knowledge-intensive service professions in Sweden – The idealization of youth in neoliberal labor markets Social engagement among older women in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1