农村社会工程:印度和马来西亚非殖民化时期的农村重组(1947–60)

IF 0.3 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Rural History-Economy Society Culture Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.1017/s0956793323000055
Clemens Six
{"title":"农村社会工程:印度和马来西亚非殖民化时期的农村重组(1947–60)","authors":"Clemens Six","doi":"10.1017/s0956793323000055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In an interview in the early 1980s, Michel Foucault predicated that, from the eighteenth century on, modern government rationality has essentially been a form of urban planning. This article challenges this argument. It discusses the formation of rural social engineering, that is, the state-led efforts to design new men and new social orders outside the cities through plans, during decolonisation in Asia. Based on the comparative study of India after Partition (1947) and British Malaya during the counter-insurgency war (1948–60), the argument is that we can understand rural social engineering particularly in the 1950s less as a consequence of colonial inheritance or international change but as the result of how decolonisation unfolded including its patterns of violence, social conflict, and migration. As such, rural social engineering constituted a central element in the postcolonial ‘art of the government of man’.","PeriodicalId":44300,"journal":{"name":"Rural History-Economy Society Culture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural social engineering: reordering the countryside in decolonising India and Malaysia (1947–60)\",\"authors\":\"Clemens Six\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0956793323000055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In an interview in the early 1980s, Michel Foucault predicated that, from the eighteenth century on, modern government rationality has essentially been a form of urban planning. This article challenges this argument. It discusses the formation of rural social engineering, that is, the state-led efforts to design new men and new social orders outside the cities through plans, during decolonisation in Asia. Based on the comparative study of India after Partition (1947) and British Malaya during the counter-insurgency war (1948–60), the argument is that we can understand rural social engineering particularly in the 1950s less as a consequence of colonial inheritance or international change but as the result of how decolonisation unfolded including its patterns of violence, social conflict, and migration. As such, rural social engineering constituted a central element in the postcolonial ‘art of the government of man’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural History-Economy Society Culture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural History-Economy Society Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956793323000055\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural History-Economy Society Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956793323000055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪80年代初的一次采访中,米歇尔·福柯断言,从18世纪开始,现代政府理性本质上是城市规划的一种形式。这篇文章对这一论点提出了质疑。它讨论了农村社会工程的形成,即在亚洲非殖民化期间,国家领导的通过计划设计城市以外的新男人和新社会秩序的努力。基于对分治后的印度(1947年)和反叛乱战争期间的英属马来亚(1948-60年)的比较研究,我们可以理解农村社会工程,特别是在20世纪50年代,它不是殖民地继承或国际变革的结果,而是非殖民化如何展开的结果,包括其暴力模式、社会冲突、,以及移民。因此,农村社会工程构成了后殖民时代“人治艺术”的核心元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rural social engineering: reordering the countryside in decolonising India and Malaysia (1947–60)
In an interview in the early 1980s, Michel Foucault predicated that, from the eighteenth century on, modern government rationality has essentially been a form of urban planning. This article challenges this argument. It discusses the formation of rural social engineering, that is, the state-led efforts to design new men and new social orders outside the cities through plans, during decolonisation in Asia. Based on the comparative study of India after Partition (1947) and British Malaya during the counter-insurgency war (1948–60), the argument is that we can understand rural social engineering particularly in the 1950s less as a consequence of colonial inheritance or international change but as the result of how decolonisation unfolded including its patterns of violence, social conflict, and migration. As such, rural social engineering constituted a central element in the postcolonial ‘art of the government of man’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Rural History is well known as a stimulating forum for interdisciplinary exchange. Its definition of rural history ignores traditional subject boundaries to encourage the cross-fertilisation that is essential for an understanding of rural society. It stimulates original scholarship and provides access to the best of recent research. While concentrating on the English-speaking world and Europe, the journal is not limited in geographical coverage. Subject areas include: agricultural history; historical ecology; folklore; popular culture and religion; rural literature; landscape history, archaeology and material culture; vernacular architecture; ethnography, anthropology and rural sociology; the study of women in rural societies.
期刊最新文献
Pre-industrial ‘charity land’ and the dynamics of rural poverty in south-west England, 1656–1739: a case study The ‘pheasant of the future’: Encountering and imagining Reeves’ pheasant in Britain, 1831 – 1913 RUH volume 34 issue 2 Cover and Back matter RUH volume 34 issue 2 Cover and Front matter A Rebato: Popular uprisings and the striking of the bells in eighteenth-century Castile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1