{"title":"构词法的形式/意义不对称","authors":"E. Dugas","doi":"10.1075/CF.00018.DUG","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The paper deals with the French morphological prefixation pattern [non-N]\n (non-qualification ‘non-qualification’, non-Italien ‘non-Italian’, and\n non-ville ‘non-city’). It discusses the form/meaning asymmetry displayed by this pattern and its\n compositionality. It is shown that the general pattern [non-N] actually corresponds to three distinct\n subconstructions, i.e. distinct form/meaning pairings. Although pragmatic factors may be seen as presenting a challenge to the\n compositionality of these constructions, it is argued that [non-N]s must be seen as compositional as long as\n compositionality is defined not only in terms of truth-conditional semantics, but also of pragmatics.","PeriodicalId":42321,"journal":{"name":"Constructions and Frames","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Form/meaning asymmetry in word formation\",\"authors\":\"E. Dugas\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/CF.00018.DUG\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The paper deals with the French morphological prefixation pattern [non-N]\\n (non-qualification ‘non-qualification’, non-Italien ‘non-Italian’, and\\n non-ville ‘non-city’). It discusses the form/meaning asymmetry displayed by this pattern and its\\n compositionality. It is shown that the general pattern [non-N] actually corresponds to three distinct\\n subconstructions, i.e. distinct form/meaning pairings. Although pragmatic factors may be seen as presenting a challenge to the\\n compositionality of these constructions, it is argued that [non-N]s must be seen as compositional as long as\\n compositionality is defined not only in terms of truth-conditional semantics, but also of pragmatics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00018.DUG\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructions and Frames","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00018.DUG","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper deals with the French morphological prefixation pattern [non-N]
(non-qualification ‘non-qualification’, non-Italien ‘non-Italian’, and
non-ville ‘non-city’). It discusses the form/meaning asymmetry displayed by this pattern and its
compositionality. It is shown that the general pattern [non-N] actually corresponds to three distinct
subconstructions, i.e. distinct form/meaning pairings. Although pragmatic factors may be seen as presenting a challenge to the
compositionality of these constructions, it is argued that [non-N]s must be seen as compositional as long as
compositionality is defined not only in terms of truth-conditional semantics, but also of pragmatics.