强迫症患者认知融合、经验回避与强迫症症状的关系

Lifang Qiu, Jian Liu, Wenxin Tang, Cuiru Yang, Cheng Zhu, Xia Zhao, Wenjing Zhu
{"title":"强迫症患者认知融合、经验回避与强迫症症状的关系","authors":"Lifang Qiu, Jian Liu, Wenxin Tang, Cuiru Yang, Cheng Zhu, Xia Zhao, Wenjing Zhu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the difference of cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance between patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and healthy control group, and to explore the relationship between obsessive-compulsive score and cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance. \n \n \nMethods \nThe cognitive fusion questionnaire(CFQ), acceptance and action questionnaire-2nd edition(AAQ-II) and Yale-Brown scale for obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Y-BOCS) were used to investigate 100 subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and 166 healthy controls.And the differences in cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance scores were compared between the two groups.The relationship of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance was analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. \n \n \nResults \nThe scores of cognitive fusion ((49.89±10.62) vs (33.88±11.44), t=-11.345, P<0.01)and empirical avoidance ((29.75±9.53) vs (21.59±7.03), t=-7.995, P<0.01) in obsessive-compulsive disorder group were significantly higher than those in healthy control group.There were significant differences in cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance in age variables (F=8.63, P<0.01). In AAQ-Ⅱ, item 2 (r=0.246, P<0.05), item 6 (r=0.223, P<0.05) and total score (r=0.240, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the total score of Y-BOCS.Item 2 (r=0.311, P<0.01), item 3 (r=0.286, P<0.05), item 6 (r=0.248, P<0.05) and total score (r=0.229, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the scores of obsessive-thinking.In CFQ, item 2 (r=0.231, P<0.0) 5), item 4 (r=0.242, P<0.05), item 7 (r=0.308, P<0.05), item 8 (r=0.277, P<0.05) and item 9 (r=0.249, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the total score of Y-BOCS.Item 8 (r=0.261, P<0.05) was positively correlated with the scores of obsessive-thinking, item 7 (r=0.237, P<0.05) and item 9 (r=0.238, P<0.05) were positively correlated with scores of obsessive-compulsive behavior.When predicting total obsessive-compulsive scores, only CF item 7 of Q (B=1.827, P<0.01), item 3 (B=0.956, P<0.05), and item 6 of AAQ-Ⅱ (B=0.584, P<0.05) entered the equation with a joint explanatory variation of 19%.When predicting the score of obsessive-thinking, only item 2 of AAQ-Ⅱ (B=0.446, P<0.01) entered the equation, explaining the variance was 9.7%.In the prediction of obsessive-compulsive behavior, only item 9 (B=0.815, P<0.05) of CFQ entered the equation, and the explanatory variation was 5.6%. \n \n \nConclusion \nCognitive fusion in the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and the high level of empirical avoidance may be an important factor for the maintenance of the symptoms. \n \n \nKey words: \nObsessive-compulsive disorder; Cognitive fusion; Empirical avoidance; Acceptance and commitment therapy","PeriodicalId":9940,"journal":{"name":"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志","volume":"28 1","pages":"999-1004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder\",\"authors\":\"Lifang Qiu, Jian Liu, Wenxin Tang, Cuiru Yang, Cheng Zhu, Xia Zhao, Wenjing Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the difference of cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance between patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and healthy control group, and to explore the relationship between obsessive-compulsive score and cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe cognitive fusion questionnaire(CFQ), acceptance and action questionnaire-2nd edition(AAQ-II) and Yale-Brown scale for obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Y-BOCS) were used to investigate 100 subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and 166 healthy controls.And the differences in cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance scores were compared between the two groups.The relationship of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance was analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe scores of cognitive fusion ((49.89±10.62) vs (33.88±11.44), t=-11.345, P<0.01)and empirical avoidance ((29.75±9.53) vs (21.59±7.03), t=-7.995, P<0.01) in obsessive-compulsive disorder group were significantly higher than those in healthy control group.There were significant differences in cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance in age variables (F=8.63, P<0.01). In AAQ-Ⅱ, item 2 (r=0.246, P<0.05), item 6 (r=0.223, P<0.05) and total score (r=0.240, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the total score of Y-BOCS.Item 2 (r=0.311, P<0.01), item 3 (r=0.286, P<0.05), item 6 (r=0.248, P<0.05) and total score (r=0.229, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the scores of obsessive-thinking.In CFQ, item 2 (r=0.231, P<0.0) 5), item 4 (r=0.242, P<0.05), item 7 (r=0.308, P<0.05), item 8 (r=0.277, P<0.05) and item 9 (r=0.249, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the total score of Y-BOCS.Item 8 (r=0.261, P<0.05) was positively correlated with the scores of obsessive-thinking, item 7 (r=0.237, P<0.05) and item 9 (r=0.238, P<0.05) were positively correlated with scores of obsessive-compulsive behavior.When predicting total obsessive-compulsive scores, only CF item 7 of Q (B=1.827, P<0.01), item 3 (B=0.956, P<0.05), and item 6 of AAQ-Ⅱ (B=0.584, P<0.05) entered the equation with a joint explanatory variation of 19%.When predicting the score of obsessive-thinking, only item 2 of AAQ-Ⅱ (B=0.446, P<0.01) entered the equation, explaining the variance was 9.7%.In the prediction of obsessive-compulsive behavior, only item 9 (B=0.815, P<0.05) of CFQ entered the equation, and the explanatory variation was 5.6%. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nCognitive fusion in the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and the high level of empirical avoidance may be an important factor for the maintenance of the symptoms. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nObsessive-compulsive disorder; Cognitive fusion; Empirical avoidance; Acceptance and commitment therapy\",\"PeriodicalId\":9940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"999-1004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.11.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.11.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较强迫症患者与健康对照组在认知融合、经验回避方面的差异,探讨强迫症评分与认知融合、体验回避的关系。方法采用认知融合问卷(CFQ)、接受与行动问卷(AAQ-II)和Yale-Brown强迫症状量表(Y-BOCS)对100名强迫症患者和166名健康对照进行调查。并比较两组在认知融合和经验回避得分方面的差异。采用多元线性回归分析法分析强迫症症状与认知融合、经验回避的关系。结果强迫症组认知融合评分(49.89±10.62)vs(33.88±11.44),t=-11.345,P<0.01)和经验回避评分(29.75±9.53)vs(21.59±7.03),t=-7.995,P<0.01)显著高于健康对照组。年龄变量在认知融合和经验回避方面存在显著差异(F=8.63,P<0.01)。在AAQ-Ⅱ中,第2项(r=0.246,P<0.05)、第6项(r=0.223,P<0.05)和总分(r=0.240,P<0.05)与Y-BOCS总分呈正相关,项目6(r=0.248,P<0.05)和总分(r=0.229,P<0.05)与强迫思维得分呈正相关,第8项(r=0.277,P<0.05)和第9项(r=0.249,P<0.05)与Y-BOCS总分呈正相关。在预测强迫症总分时,只有Q的CF项目7(B=1.827,P<0.01)、项目3(B=0.956,P<0.05)和AAQ-Ⅱ的项目6(B=0.584,P<0.05)进入方程,联合解释变异为19%,解释方差为9.7%。在强迫行为预测中,只有CFQ第9项(B=0.815,P<0.05)进入方程,解释方差为5.6%。结论强迫症患者的认知融合和高度的经验回避可能是维持症状的重要因素。关键词:强迫症;认知融合;经验回避;接受和承诺疗法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder
Objective To compare the difference of cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance between patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and healthy control group, and to explore the relationship between obsessive-compulsive score and cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance. Methods The cognitive fusion questionnaire(CFQ), acceptance and action questionnaire-2nd edition(AAQ-II) and Yale-Brown scale for obsessive-compulsive symptoms (Y-BOCS) were used to investigate 100 subjects with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and 166 healthy controls.And the differences in cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance scores were compared between the two groups.The relationship of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and cognitive fusion, empirical avoidance was analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. Results The scores of cognitive fusion ((49.89±10.62) vs (33.88±11.44), t=-11.345, P<0.01)and empirical avoidance ((29.75±9.53) vs (21.59±7.03), t=-7.995, P<0.01) in obsessive-compulsive disorder group were significantly higher than those in healthy control group.There were significant differences in cognitive fusion and empirical avoidance in age variables (F=8.63, P<0.01). In AAQ-Ⅱ, item 2 (r=0.246, P<0.05), item 6 (r=0.223, P<0.05) and total score (r=0.240, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the total score of Y-BOCS.Item 2 (r=0.311, P<0.01), item 3 (r=0.286, P<0.05), item 6 (r=0.248, P<0.05) and total score (r=0.229, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the scores of obsessive-thinking.In CFQ, item 2 (r=0.231, P<0.0) 5), item 4 (r=0.242, P<0.05), item 7 (r=0.308, P<0.05), item 8 (r=0.277, P<0.05) and item 9 (r=0.249, P<0.05) were positively correlated with the total score of Y-BOCS.Item 8 (r=0.261, P<0.05) was positively correlated with the scores of obsessive-thinking, item 7 (r=0.237, P<0.05) and item 9 (r=0.238, P<0.05) were positively correlated with scores of obsessive-compulsive behavior.When predicting total obsessive-compulsive scores, only CF item 7 of Q (B=1.827, P<0.01), item 3 (B=0.956, P<0.05), and item 6 of AAQ-Ⅱ (B=0.584, P<0.05) entered the equation with a joint explanatory variation of 19%.When predicting the score of obsessive-thinking, only item 2 of AAQ-Ⅱ (B=0.446, P<0.01) entered the equation, explaining the variance was 9.7%.In the prediction of obsessive-compulsive behavior, only item 9 (B=0.815, P<0.05) of CFQ entered the equation, and the explanatory variation was 5.6%. Conclusion Cognitive fusion in the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and the high level of empirical avoidance may be an important factor for the maintenance of the symptoms. Key words: Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Cognitive fusion; Empirical avoidance; Acceptance and commitment therapy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8131
期刊介绍: "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" (CN 37-1468/R, ISSN 1674-6554) is a national academic journal under the supervision of the National Health Commission, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and Jining Medical College. The journal was founded in June 1992 and was formerly known as "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine" (1992-1993) and "Chinese Behavioral Medical Science" (1994-2008). In 2009, it was renamed "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" with the approval of the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television. The purpose of "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" is to implement the health and health policies of the Party and the State, implement the principle of combining theory with practice and popularization and improvement, and reflect the major progress in the theory and practical application of behavioral medicine and brain science in my country. It publishes academic papers and scientific research results in the field of behavioral medicine and brain science in my country, and has columns such as monographs/reviews, basic research, clinical research, health prevention, methods and techniques, psychological behavior and evaluation, and systematic evaluation.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive function characteristics in patients with myasthenia gravis Association of endocannabinoid and its metabolic enzymes with severity in children with autism spectrum disorder The role of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA in the remission of aggression behavior in socially isolated mice and the mechanism of 5-serotonin-2C receptor Correlation of total magnetic resonance imaging burden with homocysteine in patients with cerebral small vessel disease Effect of behavioral intervention on the prognosis of patients with carotid artery stenting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1