重新设计欧盟财政规则:从规则到标准

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Ekonomicheskaya politika Pub Date : 2021-01-28 DOI:10.1093/EPOLIC/EIAB003
O. Blanchard, Álvaro Leandro, Jeromin Zettelmeyer
{"title":"重新设计欧盟财政规则:从规则到标准","authors":"O. Blanchard, Álvaro Leandro, Jeromin Zettelmeyer","doi":"10.1093/EPOLIC/EIAB003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n European Union (EU) fiscal rules have been suspended until at least the end of 2021. When they are reinstated, they will need to be modified, if only because of the high levels of debt. Various proposals have been made and more are to come, suggesting various changes and simplifications. In this paper, we take a step back and discuss how one should think about debt sustainability in the current and likely future EU economic environment. We argue that, given the complexity of the answer, it is an illusion to think that EU fiscal rules can be simple. But it is also an illusion to think that they can ever be complex enough to accommodate most relevant contingencies. This leads us to propose the abandonment of fiscal rules in favor of fiscal standards, that is, qualitative prescriptions that leave room for judgement together with a process to decide whether the standards are met. Central to this process would be country-specific assessments using stochastic debt sustainability analysis , led by national independent fiscal councils and/or the European Commission. Disputes between member states and the European Commission on application of the standards should preferably be adjudicated by an independent institution, such as the European Court of Justice(or a specialized chamber), rather than by the Council of the EU.","PeriodicalId":43996,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomicheskaya politika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/EPOLIC/EIAB003","citationCount":"81","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redesigning EU fiscal rules: from rules to standards\",\"authors\":\"O. Blanchard, Álvaro Leandro, Jeromin Zettelmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/EPOLIC/EIAB003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n European Union (EU) fiscal rules have been suspended until at least the end of 2021. When they are reinstated, they will need to be modified, if only because of the high levels of debt. Various proposals have been made and more are to come, suggesting various changes and simplifications. In this paper, we take a step back and discuss how one should think about debt sustainability in the current and likely future EU economic environment. We argue that, given the complexity of the answer, it is an illusion to think that EU fiscal rules can be simple. But it is also an illusion to think that they can ever be complex enough to accommodate most relevant contingencies. This leads us to propose the abandonment of fiscal rules in favor of fiscal standards, that is, qualitative prescriptions that leave room for judgement together with a process to decide whether the standards are met. Central to this process would be country-specific assessments using stochastic debt sustainability analysis , led by national independent fiscal councils and/or the European Commission. Disputes between member states and the European Commission on application of the standards should preferably be adjudicated by an independent institution, such as the European Court of Justice(or a specialized chamber), rather than by the Council of the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomicheskaya politika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/EPOLIC/EIAB003\",\"citationCount\":\"81\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomicheskaya politika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/EPOLIC/EIAB003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomicheskaya politika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/EPOLIC/EIAB003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 81

摘要

欧盟(EU)财政规则已暂停执行,至少要到2021年底。当它们恢复时,它们将需要被修改,哪怕只是因为高水平的债务。已经提出了各种建议,并将提出更多建议,建议进行各种更改和简化。在本文中,我们退后一步,讨论在当前和未来可能的欧盟经济环境中,人们应该如何思考债务可持续性。我们认为,鉴于答案的复杂性,认为欧盟财政规则可以很简单的想法是一种错觉。但如果认为它们能够复杂到足以适应大多数相关的偶然性,那也是一种错觉。这导致我们建议放弃财政规则,转而采用财政标准,即定性的规定,为判断留出空间,并制定一个决定是否满足标准的过程。这一进程的核心是由国家独立财政委员会和(或)欧洲委员会牵头,利用随机债务可持续性分析对具体国家进行评估。成员国与欧盟委员会(European Commission)之间关于标准应用的争议,最好由一个独立机构裁决,比如欧洲法院(European Court of Justice)(或一个专门法庭),而不是由欧盟理事会(Council of EU)裁决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Redesigning EU fiscal rules: from rules to standards
European Union (EU) fiscal rules have been suspended until at least the end of 2021. When they are reinstated, they will need to be modified, if only because of the high levels of debt. Various proposals have been made and more are to come, suggesting various changes and simplifications. In this paper, we take a step back and discuss how one should think about debt sustainability in the current and likely future EU economic environment. We argue that, given the complexity of the answer, it is an illusion to think that EU fiscal rules can be simple. But it is also an illusion to think that they can ever be complex enough to accommodate most relevant contingencies. This leads us to propose the abandonment of fiscal rules in favor of fiscal standards, that is, qualitative prescriptions that leave room for judgement together with a process to decide whether the standards are met. Central to this process would be country-specific assessments using stochastic debt sustainability analysis , led by national independent fiscal councils and/or the European Commission. Disputes between member states and the European Commission on application of the standards should preferably be adjudicated by an independent institution, such as the European Court of Justice(or a specialized chamber), rather than by the Council of the EU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ekonomicheskaya Politika is a broad-range economic journal devoted primarily to the study of the economic policy of present-day Russia as well as global economic problems. The subject matters of articles includes macroeconomic, fiscal, monetary, industrial, social, regulation and competition policyand more. The journal also publishes theoretical papers in such areas as political economy, general economic theory, welfare economics, law and economics,and institutional economics.. The character and the scope of economic problems studied in many publications require a multidisciplinary approach, consistent with the editorial policy of the journal. While the thematic scope of articles is generally related to Russia, the aim of editorial policy is to cover politico-economic processes in the modern world and international economic relations, as well. In addition, Ekonomicheskaya Politika publishes Russian translations of classical and significant modern works of foreign economists.
期刊最新文献
The effects of leaving the EU on the geography of UK trade Nudges and Threats: Soft vs Hard Incentives for Tax Compliance The Legacies of War for Ukraine Panel discussion of: Religious symbols in schools Gabrielle Fack discussion of: Teacher bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1