Owen P. Missen, Stuart J. Mills, Michael S. Rumsey, Matthias Weil, Werner Artner, John Spratt, Jens Najorka
{"title":"Bi2TeO6-nH2O(0 ≤ n ≤ ({\\raise0.5ex\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle 2$})的晶体结构和研究\\kern-0.1em/kern-0.15em(lower0.25ex\\hbox{$scriptstyle 3$}}):天然和合成芒硝","authors":"Owen P. Missen, Stuart J. Mills, Michael S. Rumsey, Matthias Weil, Werner Artner, John Spratt, Jens Najorka","doi":"10.1007/s00269-022-01198-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The crystal structure of montanite has been determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction on a synthetic sample, supported by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA). Montanite was first described in 1868 as Bi<sub>2</sub>TeO<sub>6</sub>·<i>n</i>H<sub>2</sub>O (<i>n</i> = 1 or 2). The determination of the crystal structure of synthetic montanite (refined composition Bi<sub>2</sub>TeO<sub>6</sub>·0.22H<sub>2</sub>O) has led to the reassignment of the formula to Bi<sub>2</sub>TeO<sub>6</sub>·<i>n</i>H<sub>2</sub>O where 0 ≤ <i>n</i> ≤ <span>\\({\\raise0.5ex\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle 2$} \\kern-0.1em/\\kern-0.15em \\lower0.25ex\\hbox{$\\scriptstyle 3$}}\\)</span> rather than the commonly reported Bi<sub>2</sub>TeO<sub>6</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O. This change has been accepted by the IMA–CNMNC, Proposal 22-A. The PXRD pattern simulated from the crystal structure of synthetic montanite is a satisfactory match for PXRD scans collected on both historical and recent natural samples, showing their equivalence. Two specimens attributed to the original discoverer of montanite (Frederick A. Genth) from the cotype localities (Highland Mining District, Montana and David Beck’s mine, North Carolina, USA) have been designated as neotypes. Montanite crystallises in space group <i>P</i><span>\\(\\overline{6 }\\)</span>, with the unit-cell parameters <i>a</i> = 9.1195(14) Å, <i>c</i> = 5.5694(8) Å, <i>V</i> = 401.13(14) Å<sup>3</sup>, and three formula units in the unit cell. The crystal structure of montanite is formed from a framework of BiO<sub><i>n</i></sub> and TeO<sub>6</sub> polyhedra. Half of the Bi<sup>3+</sup> and all of the Te<sup>6+</sup> cations are coordinated by six oxygen atoms in trigonal-prismatic arrangements (the first example of this configuration reported for Te<sup>6+</sup>), while the remaining Bi<sup>3+</sup> cations are coordinated by seven O sites. The H<sub>2</sub>O groups in montanite are structurally incorporated into the network of cavities formed by the three-dimensional framework, with other cavity space occupied by the stereoactive 6<i>s</i><sup>2</sup> lone pair of Bi<sup>3+</sup> cations. While evidence for a supercell was observed in synthetic montanite, the subcell refinement of montanite adequately indexes all reflections in the PXRD patterns observed in all natural montanite samples analysed in this study, verifying the identity of montanite as a mineral.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20132,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of Minerals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00269-022-01198-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crystal structure and investigation of Bi2TeO6·nH2O (0 ≤ n ≤ \\\\({\\\\raise0.5ex\\\\hbox{$\\\\scriptstyle 2$} \\\\kern-0.1em/\\\\kern-0.15em \\\\lower0.25ex\\\\hbox{$\\\\scriptstyle 3$}}\\\\)): natural and synthetic montanite\",\"authors\":\"Owen P. Missen, Stuart J. Mills, Michael S. Rumsey, Matthias Weil, Werner Artner, John Spratt, Jens Najorka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00269-022-01198-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The crystal structure of montanite has been determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction on a synthetic sample, supported by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA). Montanite was first described in 1868 as Bi<sub>2</sub>TeO<sub>6</sub>·<i>n</i>H<sub>2</sub>O (<i>n</i> = 1 or 2). The determination of the crystal structure of synthetic montanite (refined composition Bi<sub>2</sub>TeO<sub>6</sub>·0.22H<sub>2</sub>O) has led to the reassignment of the formula to Bi<sub>2</sub>TeO<sub>6</sub>·<i>n</i>H<sub>2</sub>O where 0 ≤ <i>n</i> ≤ <span>\\\\({\\\\raise0.5ex\\\\hbox{$\\\\scriptstyle 2$} \\\\kern-0.1em/\\\\kern-0.15em \\\\lower0.25ex\\\\hbox{$\\\\scriptstyle 3$}}\\\\)</span> rather than the commonly reported Bi<sub>2</sub>TeO<sub>6</sub>·2H<sub>2</sub>O. This change has been accepted by the IMA–CNMNC, Proposal 22-A. The PXRD pattern simulated from the crystal structure of synthetic montanite is a satisfactory match for PXRD scans collected on both historical and recent natural samples, showing their equivalence. Two specimens attributed to the original discoverer of montanite (Frederick A. Genth) from the cotype localities (Highland Mining District, Montana and David Beck’s mine, North Carolina, USA) have been designated as neotypes. Montanite crystallises in space group <i>P</i><span>\\\\(\\\\overline{6 }\\\\)</span>, with the unit-cell parameters <i>a</i> = 9.1195(14) Å, <i>c</i> = 5.5694(8) Å, <i>V</i> = 401.13(14) Å<sup>3</sup>, and three formula units in the unit cell. The crystal structure of montanite is formed from a framework of BiO<sub><i>n</i></sub> and TeO<sub>6</sub> polyhedra. Half of the Bi<sup>3+</sup> and all of the Te<sup>6+</sup> cations are coordinated by six oxygen atoms in trigonal-prismatic arrangements (the first example of this configuration reported for Te<sup>6+</sup>), while the remaining Bi<sup>3+</sup> cations are coordinated by seven O sites. The H<sub>2</sub>O groups in montanite are structurally incorporated into the network of cavities formed by the three-dimensional framework, with other cavity space occupied by the stereoactive 6<i>s</i><sup>2</sup> lone pair of Bi<sup>3+</sup> cations. While evidence for a supercell was observed in synthetic montanite, the subcell refinement of montanite adequately indexes all reflections in the PXRD patterns observed in all natural montanite samples analysed in this study, verifying the identity of montanite as a mineral.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Chemistry of Minerals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00269-022-01198-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Chemistry of Minerals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00269-022-01198-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of Minerals","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00269-022-01198-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Crystal structure and investigation of Bi2TeO6·nH2O (0 ≤ n ≤ \({\raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$} \kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em \lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 3$}}\)): natural and synthetic montanite
The crystal structure of montanite has been determined using single-crystal X-ray diffraction on a synthetic sample, supported by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA). Montanite was first described in 1868 as Bi2TeO6·nH2O (n = 1 or 2). The determination of the crystal structure of synthetic montanite (refined composition Bi2TeO6·0.22H2O) has led to the reassignment of the formula to Bi2TeO6·nH2O where 0 ≤ n ≤ \({\raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 2$} \kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em \lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 3$}}\) rather than the commonly reported Bi2TeO6·2H2O. This change has been accepted by the IMA–CNMNC, Proposal 22-A. The PXRD pattern simulated from the crystal structure of synthetic montanite is a satisfactory match for PXRD scans collected on both historical and recent natural samples, showing their equivalence. Two specimens attributed to the original discoverer of montanite (Frederick A. Genth) from the cotype localities (Highland Mining District, Montana and David Beck’s mine, North Carolina, USA) have been designated as neotypes. Montanite crystallises in space group P\(\overline{6 }\), with the unit-cell parameters a = 9.1195(14) Å, c = 5.5694(8) Å, V = 401.13(14) Å3, and three formula units in the unit cell. The crystal structure of montanite is formed from a framework of BiOn and TeO6 polyhedra. Half of the Bi3+ and all of the Te6+ cations are coordinated by six oxygen atoms in trigonal-prismatic arrangements (the first example of this configuration reported for Te6+), while the remaining Bi3+ cations are coordinated by seven O sites. The H2O groups in montanite are structurally incorporated into the network of cavities formed by the three-dimensional framework, with other cavity space occupied by the stereoactive 6s2 lone pair of Bi3+ cations. While evidence for a supercell was observed in synthetic montanite, the subcell refinement of montanite adequately indexes all reflections in the PXRD patterns observed in all natural montanite samples analysed in this study, verifying the identity of montanite as a mineral.
期刊介绍:
Physics and Chemistry of Minerals is an international journal devoted to publishing articles and short communications of physical or chemical studies on minerals or solids related to minerals. The aim of the journal is to support competent interdisciplinary work in mineralogy and physics or chemistry. Particular emphasis is placed on applications of modern techniques or new theories and models to interpret atomic structures and physical or chemical properties of minerals. Some subjects of interest are:
-Relationships between atomic structure and crystalline state (structures of various states, crystal energies, crystal growth, thermodynamic studies, phase transformations, solid solution, exsolution phenomena, etc.)
-General solid state spectroscopy (ultraviolet, visible, infrared, Raman, ESCA, luminescence, X-ray, electron paramagnetic resonance, nuclear magnetic resonance, gamma ray resonance, etc.)
-Experimental and theoretical analysis of chemical bonding in minerals (application of crystal field, molecular orbital, band theories, etc.)
-Physical properties (magnetic, mechanical, electric, optical, thermodynamic, etc.)
-Relations between thermal expansion, compressibility, elastic constants, and fundamental properties of atomic structure, particularly as applied to geophysical problems
-Electron microscopy in support of physical and chemical studies
-Computational methods in the study of the structure and properties of minerals
-Mineral surfaces (experimental methods, structure and properties)