不同阅读目的下的第二语言阅读和回忆过程:眼动追踪、按键记录和刺激回忆研究

IF 1.5 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Awareness Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.1080/09658416.2022.2069251
Jookyoung Jung, Minjin Lee
{"title":"不同阅读目的下的第二语言阅读和回忆过程:眼动追踪、按键记录和刺激回忆研究","authors":"Jookyoung Jung, Minjin Lee","doi":"10.1080/09658416.2022.2069251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explored second language (L2) reading and recall processes under different reading purposes, as reflected in their eye-movements during reading, keystrokes produced from summary writing, and stimulated recall comments. Seventy-two Korean undergraduate students read an English essay for different purposes, i.e., reading to extract the gist quickly (i.e., reading-to-skim) versus reading to prepare for a presentation (i.e., reading-to-learn), and wrote an unannounced summary of the essay. A subgroup of participants further produced stimulated recalls prompted by their own eye-movements and keystrokes. The results revealed that reading-to-skim led participants to engage in uninterrupted global text processing as manifested in significantly longer forward saccades and regressions. Those under the reading-to-learn condition, in contrast, showed significantly shorter eye-movements accompanied by constant pauses for local processing, while staying substantially longer on the essay. Reading-to-learn further resulted in more frequent pauses and revisions in the summary writing process, recalling a greater number of idea units from the essay. The findings of this study indicate that L2 learners prioritize distinct aspects of text processing depending on the reading purpose, which affects both reading and recall processes.","PeriodicalId":46683,"journal":{"name":"Language Awareness","volume":"32 1","pages":"278 - 300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Second language reading and recall processes under different reading purposes: an eye-tracking, keystroke-logging, and stimulated recall study\",\"authors\":\"Jookyoung Jung, Minjin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09658416.2022.2069251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study explored second language (L2) reading and recall processes under different reading purposes, as reflected in their eye-movements during reading, keystrokes produced from summary writing, and stimulated recall comments. Seventy-two Korean undergraduate students read an English essay for different purposes, i.e., reading to extract the gist quickly (i.e., reading-to-skim) versus reading to prepare for a presentation (i.e., reading-to-learn), and wrote an unannounced summary of the essay. A subgroup of participants further produced stimulated recalls prompted by their own eye-movements and keystrokes. The results revealed that reading-to-skim led participants to engage in uninterrupted global text processing as manifested in significantly longer forward saccades and regressions. Those under the reading-to-learn condition, in contrast, showed significantly shorter eye-movements accompanied by constant pauses for local processing, while staying substantially longer on the essay. Reading-to-learn further resulted in more frequent pauses and revisions in the summary writing process, recalling a greater number of idea units from the essay. The findings of this study indicate that L2 learners prioritize distinct aspects of text processing depending on the reading purpose, which affects both reading and recall processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Awareness\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"278 - 300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Awareness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2069251\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Awareness","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2069251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究探讨了不同阅读目的下第二语言(L2)的阅读和回忆过程,包括他们在阅读过程中的眼动、摘要写作中产生的击键和刺激的回忆评论。72名韩国本科生阅读一篇英语文章的目的不同,即阅读是为了快速提取要点(即阅读以略读),而阅读是为了准备演讲(即阅读学习),并对文章进行了未经宣布的总结。一组参与者进一步通过自己的眼球运动和按键产生刺激性回忆。结果显示,通过阅读来浏览会让参与者参与不间断的全局文本处理,表现为明显更长的向前扫视和倒退。相比之下,那些处于阅读学习状态的人表现出明显更短的眼球运动,并伴随着持续的局部处理停顿,而在文章中停留的时间则更长。为了进一步学习而阅读会导致总结写作过程中更频繁的停顿和修改,从而回忆起文章中更多的想法单元。本研究的结果表明,二语学习者根据阅读目的优先考虑文本处理的不同方面,这会影响阅读和回忆过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Second language reading and recall processes under different reading purposes: an eye-tracking, keystroke-logging, and stimulated recall study
Abstract This study explored second language (L2) reading and recall processes under different reading purposes, as reflected in their eye-movements during reading, keystrokes produced from summary writing, and stimulated recall comments. Seventy-two Korean undergraduate students read an English essay for different purposes, i.e., reading to extract the gist quickly (i.e., reading-to-skim) versus reading to prepare for a presentation (i.e., reading-to-learn), and wrote an unannounced summary of the essay. A subgroup of participants further produced stimulated recalls prompted by their own eye-movements and keystrokes. The results revealed that reading-to-skim led participants to engage in uninterrupted global text processing as manifested in significantly longer forward saccades and regressions. Those under the reading-to-learn condition, in contrast, showed significantly shorter eye-movements accompanied by constant pauses for local processing, while staying substantially longer on the essay. Reading-to-learn further resulted in more frequent pauses and revisions in the summary writing process, recalling a greater number of idea units from the essay. The findings of this study indicate that L2 learners prioritize distinct aspects of text processing depending on the reading purpose, which affects both reading and recall processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Awareness
Language Awareness Multiple-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Language Awareness encourages and disseminates work which explores the following: the role of explicit knowledge about language in the process of language learning; the role that such explicit knowledge about language plays in language teaching and how such knowledge can best be mediated by teachers; the role of explicit knowledge about language in language use: e.g. sensitivity to bias in language, manipulative aspects of language, literary use of language. It is also a goal of Language Awareness to encourage the establishment of bridges between the language sciences and other disciplines within or outside educational contexts.
期刊最新文献
Affordances in the international service-learning context for Spanish learners Content knowledge for language teaching: dialectical materialist stance on developing teacher language awareness Accommodating beginner language learners in level-based language introduction Developing an MLA-test for young learners – insights from measurement theory and language testing Fostering language awareness for integration through teacher-researcher collaboration in a Spanish bilingual education context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1