纠结的横向研究:重新想象儿童研究中的时间性

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research Pub Date : 2022-04-26 DOI:10.1177/09075682221094394
K. Gavin
{"title":"纠结的横向研究:重新想象儿童研究中的时间性","authors":"K. Gavin","doi":"10.1177/09075682221094394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article wonders how reconsidering conceptions of time in research with children could expand and complicate notions of childhoods. Drawing on Karen Barad’s (2016, 2018) writing on temporal entanglements alongside Katherine Stockton’s (2009) discussion of growing sideways, research is reviewed and data from a participatory study reexamined. These divergent notions of temporality blur boundaries between childhood and adulthood and privilege perspectives often marginalized. The conclusion discusses implications of temporal orientations when researching with children including conceptions of pandemic time.","PeriodicalId":47764,"journal":{"name":"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tangled sideways research: Reimagining temporality in research with children\",\"authors\":\"K. Gavin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09075682221094394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article wonders how reconsidering conceptions of time in research with children could expand and complicate notions of childhoods. Drawing on Karen Barad’s (2016, 2018) writing on temporal entanglements alongside Katherine Stockton’s (2009) discussion of growing sideways, research is reviewed and data from a participatory study reexamined. These divergent notions of temporality blur boundaries between childhood and adulthood and privilege perspectives often marginalized. The conclusion discusses implications of temporal orientations when researching with children including conceptions of pandemic time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682221094394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682221094394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章想知道在儿童研究中重新考虑时间概念会如何扩展和复杂化童年的概念。借鉴Karen Barad(2016年,2018年)关于时间纠缠的文章以及Katherine Stockton(2009年)关于横向成长的讨论,对研究进行了回顾,并对参与性研究的数据进行了重新检查。这些不同的时间性概念模糊了童年和成年之间的界限,特权观点往往被边缘化。结论部分讨论了时间取向对儿童研究的影响,包括流行时间的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tangled sideways research: Reimagining temporality in research with children
This article wonders how reconsidering conceptions of time in research with children could expand and complicate notions of childhoods. Drawing on Karen Barad’s (2016, 2018) writing on temporal entanglements alongside Katherine Stockton’s (2009) discussion of growing sideways, research is reviewed and data from a participatory study reexamined. These divergent notions of temporality blur boundaries between childhood and adulthood and privilege perspectives often marginalized. The conclusion discusses implications of temporal orientations when researching with children including conceptions of pandemic time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research
Childhood-A Global Journal of Child Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Childhood is a major international peer reviewed journal and a forum for research relating to children in global society that spans divisions between geographical regions, disciplines, and social and cultural contexts. Childhood publishes theoretical and empirical articles, reviews and scholarly comments on children"s social relations and culture, with an emphasis on their rights and generational position in society.
期刊最新文献
Deepening our understanding: Collaboration through online peer-to-peer participatory action research with children. Do children have a right to do nothing? Exploring the place of passive leisure in Australian school age care Different trajectories from a common crisis. Survival migrations and resilience of venezuelan adolescents to Peru Teaching ‘global childhoods’ in Childhood Studies Research ethics in childhood research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1