网上作业对面对面学习和网上微观经济学原理的影响

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Education for Business Pub Date : 2022-01-31 DOI:10.1080/08832323.2022.2028711
Seife Dendir
{"title":"网上作业对面对面学习和网上微观经济学原理的影响","authors":"Seife Dendir","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2022.2028711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigates whether online homework improves learning in principles of microeconomics. It contributes to the related literature in two dimensions. First, it tests whether there is a positive association between students’ performances on homework and exams. Importantly, it measures learning through exams that were given shortly after students completed the relevant homework, thereby avoiding a potential “decaying effect.” Second, it tests whether the impact of homework varies by learning mode—face-to-face versus online. Results show that online homework improves learning. However, there is no significant difference in the impact of homework between the two learning modes.","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":"98 1","pages":"59 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of online homework on learning in face-to-face and online principles of microeconomics\",\"authors\":\"Seife Dendir\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08832323.2022.2028711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study investigates whether online homework improves learning in principles of microeconomics. It contributes to the related literature in two dimensions. First, it tests whether there is a positive association between students’ performances on homework and exams. Importantly, it measures learning through exams that were given shortly after students completed the relevant homework, thereby avoiding a potential “decaying effect.” Second, it tests whether the impact of homework varies by learning mode—face-to-face versus online. Results show that online homework improves learning. However, there is no significant difference in the impact of homework between the two learning modes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"59 - 67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2022.2028711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2022.2028711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨网络作业是否能促进微观经济学原理的学习。它在两个维度上贡献了相关文献。首先,它测试学生的家庭作业成绩和考试成绩之间是否存在正相关关系。重要的是,它通过学生完成相关作业后不久进行的考试来衡量学习情况,从而避免了潜在的“衰减效应”。其次,它测试了家庭作业的影响是否因学习模式(面对面与在线)而异。结果表明,在线作业对学习有促进作用。然而,两种学习模式对家庭作业的影响没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of online homework on learning in face-to-face and online principles of microeconomics
Abstract This study investigates whether online homework improves learning in principles of microeconomics. It contributes to the related literature in two dimensions. First, it tests whether there is a positive association between students’ performances on homework and exams. Importantly, it measures learning through exams that were given shortly after students completed the relevant homework, thereby avoiding a potential “decaying effect.” Second, it tests whether the impact of homework varies by learning mode—face-to-face versus online. Results show that online homework improves learning. However, there is no significant difference in the impact of homework between the two learning modes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education for Business
Journal of Education for Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of student evaluations: Exploring the effects of course modality and type in graduate business courses Embedded SDGs in undergraduate business sustainability programs curricula We have talent: Mock group interviewing improves employer perceived competence on hireability Unveiling student intention towards entrepreneurship development—a bibliometric investigation Measuring the impact of faculty development programmes on business schools’ performance in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1