俄罗斯港口综合体设计中噪声评估和监管的环境方面

IF 0.1 Q4 ACOUSTICS Akustika Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.36336/akustika20193472
Vladimir Zhigulski, D. Zhigulskaya, V. Shuisky, Ekaterina Chebynina, V. Panichev
{"title":"俄罗斯港口综合体设计中噪声评估和监管的环境方面","authors":"Vladimir Zhigulski, D. Zhigulskaya, V. Shuisky, Ekaterina Chebynina, V. Panichev","doi":"10.36336/akustika20193472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative analysis of various biological objects sensitivity to acoustic effects is being conducted. For many animal species, the frequency range at which sounds are heard is very different from that for humans and may not even intersect with it. The total frequency range at which various animals can hear covers at least eight orders of magnitude (from hundredths of Hz to hundreds of kHz), while for humans this interval is limited to only four orders of magnitude. Thus, the existing anthropocentric standards for permissible noise levels are unsuitable for regulating their impacts on natural ecosystems and it is necessary to develop standards for sound pressure levels in the entire specified frequency range that are acceptable for the most sensitive recipients. For terrestrial and riparian ecosystems and protected areas, natural test subjects are birds, for which noise levels of 35-40 dBA do not cause pathological changes in behavior and physiological processes. This level can tentatively be considered as maximum permissible for man-made noise and for the noise of ports in particular. More reliable results will be given by regulating the permissible sound pressure levels in the entire frequency range based on reactions of the most sensitive recipients in each octave.","PeriodicalId":42295,"journal":{"name":"Akustika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ENVIROMENTAL ASPECTS OF NOISE ASSESSMENT AND REGULATION IN THE DESIGN OF PORT COMPLEXES IN RUSSIA\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Zhigulski, D. Zhigulskaya, V. Shuisky, Ekaterina Chebynina, V. Panichev\",\"doi\":\"10.36336/akustika20193472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative analysis of various biological objects sensitivity to acoustic effects is being conducted. For many animal species, the frequency range at which sounds are heard is very different from that for humans and may not even intersect with it. The total frequency range at which various animals can hear covers at least eight orders of magnitude (from hundredths of Hz to hundreds of kHz), while for humans this interval is limited to only four orders of magnitude. Thus, the existing anthropocentric standards for permissible noise levels are unsuitable for regulating their impacts on natural ecosystems and it is necessary to develop standards for sound pressure levels in the entire specified frequency range that are acceptable for the most sensitive recipients. For terrestrial and riparian ecosystems and protected areas, natural test subjects are birds, for which noise levels of 35-40 dBA do not cause pathological changes in behavior and physiological processes. This level can tentatively be considered as maximum permissible for man-made noise and for the noise of ports in particular. More reliable results will be given by regulating the permissible sound pressure levels in the entire frequency range based on reactions of the most sensitive recipients in each octave.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Akustika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Akustika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36336/akustika20193472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akustika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36336/akustika20193472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对各种生物物体对声效应的敏感性进行了比较分析。对于许多动物物种来说,它们听到的声音的频率范围与人类非常不同,甚至可能不会相交。各种动物能听到的总频率范围至少涵盖了8个数量级(从百分之百赫兹到数百千赫),而人类的这个区间仅限于4个数量级。因此,现行以人类为中心的容许噪音声级标准,并不适合规管它们对自然生态系统的影响,因此有必要在整个指定频率范围内,为最敏感的接收者制定可接受的声压级标准。对于陆生和滨水生态系统和保护区,自然测试对象为鸟类,35-40 dBA的噪声水平不会引起鸟类行为和生理过程的病理变化。这个水平可以暂时被认为是人为噪音,特别是港口噪音的最大允许水平。根据每个八度内最敏感的受者的反应来调节整个频率范围内的允许声压级,可以得到更可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ENVIROMENTAL ASPECTS OF NOISE ASSESSMENT AND REGULATION IN THE DESIGN OF PORT COMPLEXES IN RUSSIA
A comparative analysis of various biological objects sensitivity to acoustic effects is being conducted. For many animal species, the frequency range at which sounds are heard is very different from that for humans and may not even intersect with it. The total frequency range at which various animals can hear covers at least eight orders of magnitude (from hundredths of Hz to hundreds of kHz), while for humans this interval is limited to only four orders of magnitude. Thus, the existing anthropocentric standards for permissible noise levels are unsuitable for regulating their impacts on natural ecosystems and it is necessary to develop standards for sound pressure levels in the entire specified frequency range that are acceptable for the most sensitive recipients. For terrestrial and riparian ecosystems and protected areas, natural test subjects are birds, for which noise levels of 35-40 dBA do not cause pathological changes in behavior and physiological processes. This level can tentatively be considered as maximum permissible for man-made noise and for the noise of ports in particular. More reliable results will be given by regulating the permissible sound pressure levels in the entire frequency range based on reactions of the most sensitive recipients in each octave.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Akustika
Akustika ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
THE VIBRATION MEASUREMENT USING MICROCONTROLLERS NOISE REDUCTION ON AIR DISTRIBUTION GRILLES USING 3D PRINTED INFILL STRUCTURES OPTIMUM PROPAGATION IN OCEAN: THE COMPARISON BETWEEN NORMAL MODE AND EMPIRICAL FRANCOIS-GARRISON FORMULA TESTING A NOVEL HYBRID SPIRAL MICROPHONE ARRAY DESIGNED FOR PERFORMANCE AND PORTA DIFFRACTION OF A SPHERICAL WAVE BY A HARD HALF-PLANE: POLYNOMIAL FORMULATION OF EDGE-DIFFRACTED FIELD IN THE FREQUENCY DOMAIN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1