西班牙失效儿童环境量表(ICES)的验证性因素分析

IF 0.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Universitas Psychologica Pub Date : 2020-04-30 DOI:10.11144/javeriana.upsy19.cfai
M. Puddington, Erika Wright, Pablo Gagliesi
{"title":"西班牙失效儿童环境量表(ICES)的验证性因素分析","authors":"M. Puddington, Erika Wright, Pablo Gagliesi","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.upsy19.cfai","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Objective: The Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale (ICES) is an instrument designed to assess retrospectively parental invalidation experience, according to Marsha Linehan’s definition of invalidation. The main aim of this paper is to determine the factorial structure of the ICES. Three factor structures: Standard Model, Reduced Model, and 2 Factor Model are examined. Also, the association between invalidating experience and borderline symptoms is studied. Method: Data from a non-clinical, volunteer sample of 274 adults was collected. Participants completed 4 surveys: Demographic surveys, Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale (ICES), Borderline Symptoms List (BSL 23), and Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). Statistical analyses included confirmatory factor analysis and multiple linear regression. Results: The results of the analysis presented indicate that the ICES is a reliable instrument, and that the 2 Factor Model is good fit and allows for a broader understanding of invalidation and it’s qualities. The results of the linear regression analysis indicated a mild but significant association between invalidation and BPD symptoms. Internal consistency was acceptable for all levels. Conclusion: The outcome of this study shows that the ICES is a useful instrument that can be used to make progress in uncovering the role of childhood invalidation in BPD.","PeriodicalId":47141,"journal":{"name":"Universitas Psychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11144/javeriana.upsy19.cfai","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale in Spanish (ICES)\",\"authors\":\"M. Puddington, Erika Wright, Pablo Gagliesi\",\"doi\":\"10.11144/javeriana.upsy19.cfai\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Objective: The Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale (ICES) is an instrument designed to assess retrospectively parental invalidation experience, according to Marsha Linehan’s definition of invalidation. The main aim of this paper is to determine the factorial structure of the ICES. Three factor structures: Standard Model, Reduced Model, and 2 Factor Model are examined. Also, the association between invalidating experience and borderline symptoms is studied. Method: Data from a non-clinical, volunteer sample of 274 adults was collected. Participants completed 4 surveys: Demographic surveys, Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale (ICES), Borderline Symptoms List (BSL 23), and Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). Statistical analyses included confirmatory factor analysis and multiple linear regression. Results: The results of the analysis presented indicate that the ICES is a reliable instrument, and that the 2 Factor Model is good fit and allows for a broader understanding of invalidation and it’s qualities. The results of the linear regression analysis indicated a mild but significant association between invalidation and BPD symptoms. Internal consistency was acceptable for all levels. Conclusion: The outcome of this study shows that the ICES is a useful instrument that can be used to make progress in uncovering the role of childhood invalidation in BPD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universitas Psychologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11144/javeriana.upsy19.cfai\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universitas Psychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy19.cfai\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universitas Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.upsy19.cfai","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:根据Marsha Linehan对失效的定义,失效儿童环境量表(ICES)是一种旨在回顾性评估父母失效经历的工具。本文的主要目的是确定ICES的因子结构。检验了三因素结构:标准模型、简化模型和二因素模型。此外,还研究了无效经历和边缘症状之间的关系。方法:从274名成年人的非临床志愿者样本中收集数据。参与者完成了4项调查:人口学调查、无效儿童环境量表(ICES)、边缘症状列表(BSL23)和父母关系工具(PBI)。统计分析包括验证性因素分析和多元线性回归。结果:分析结果表明,ICES是一种可靠的仪器,二因素模型拟合良好,可以更广泛地了解失效及其性质。线性回归分析的结果表明,无效与BPD症状之间存在轻微但显著的相关性。所有级别的内部一致性都是可以接受的。结论:本研究的结果表明,ICES是一种有用的工具,可用于在揭示儿童失效在BPD中的作用方面取得进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale in Spanish (ICES)
Background/Objective: The Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale (ICES) is an instrument designed to assess retrospectively parental invalidation experience, according to Marsha Linehan’s definition of invalidation. The main aim of this paper is to determine the factorial structure of the ICES. Three factor structures: Standard Model, Reduced Model, and 2 Factor Model are examined. Also, the association between invalidating experience and borderline symptoms is studied. Method: Data from a non-clinical, volunteer sample of 274 adults was collected. Participants completed 4 surveys: Demographic surveys, Invalidating Childhood Environment Scale (ICES), Borderline Symptoms List (BSL 23), and Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). Statistical analyses included confirmatory factor analysis and multiple linear regression. Results: The results of the analysis presented indicate that the ICES is a reliable instrument, and that the 2 Factor Model is good fit and allows for a broader understanding of invalidation and it’s qualities. The results of the linear regression analysis indicated a mild but significant association between invalidation and BPD symptoms. Internal consistency was acceptable for all levels. Conclusion: The outcome of this study shows that the ICES is a useful instrument that can be used to make progress in uncovering the role of childhood invalidation in BPD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Universitas Psychologica
Universitas Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Universitas Psychologica es una revista científica trimestral con un amplio espectro temático y teórico. Es una publicación de carácter general y plural en la medida en que incluye trabajos originales, en inglés o español, de los diversos enfoques de la psicología y de sus distintos campos de aplicación. Cada año un número especial es dedicado a un tópico específico de distintas áreas de la psicología (número monográfico). El propósito de Universitas es convertirse en un fuente importante de consulta a nivel mundial y en un referente permanente de visibilidad e intercambio.
期刊最新文献
Vías de atención a pacientes con un primer episodio de psicosis: Un estudio multicéntrico y multiétnico Toxic Leadership and Followers’ Work Motivation: An Angolan Study Apego y vejez, una nueva perspectiva para la comprensión del bienestar y la regulación emocional en los mayores. Sesenta años de una Facultad expresados en veinte años de una revista: Sección Especial Monográfica Universitas Psychologica Veinte años tejiendo un libro infinito: Universitas Psychologica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1