{"title":"民粹主义、国防政策与地方领导人","authors":"Muhtar Haboddin","doi":"10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Populism, defence politics, and local leader are interrelated in the study of power. In the framework of maintaining power, local leaders will use populist policies to gain political support from the community. Community support is essential in an electoral democracy. Therefore, the local leaders will respond to the needs of its citizens in the form of populist policy. The ability of local leaders to meet the needs of their citizens is an important part of the working of populist politics. In this populist politics, the beneficiaries are leaders and society. Nevertheless, the beneficiaries are more certainly the local leaders. Why? Is it because local leaders use populism policies as instrumentation in maintaining power? By relying on that question, the choice of populist policy is aimed at two things for the local leaders. First, to gain legitimacy from the community. For local leaders, legitimacy is needed in building political power (Ramlan Surbakti, 1992; 96). It’s because the strong legitimacy will make to the local leaders more confident. Second, to strengthen the personal capacity of the local leaders in front of the community and other political forces. By relying on these two goals, the local leaders will have power stronger. Strengthening and maintaining power are the main objective for the local leaders. Therefore, this paper will attempt to present the ability of the local leaders in maintaining his power through the politics of populism at the local level (Vedi R Hadiz, 2017; Willy Purna Samadhi, 2016).","PeriodicalId":52771,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Populisme, Politik Pertahanan, Dan Pemimpin Lokal\",\"authors\":\"Muhtar Haboddin\",\"doi\":\"10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Populism, defence politics, and local leader are interrelated in the study of power. In the framework of maintaining power, local leaders will use populist policies to gain political support from the community. Community support is essential in an electoral democracy. Therefore, the local leaders will respond to the needs of its citizens in the form of populist policy. The ability of local leaders to meet the needs of their citizens is an important part of the working of populist politics. In this populist politics, the beneficiaries are leaders and society. Nevertheless, the beneficiaries are more certainly the local leaders. Why? Is it because local leaders use populism policies as instrumentation in maintaining power? By relying on that question, the choice of populist policy is aimed at two things for the local leaders. First, to gain legitimacy from the community. For local leaders, legitimacy is needed in building political power (Ramlan Surbakti, 1992; 96). It’s because the strong legitimacy will make to the local leaders more confident. Second, to strengthen the personal capacity of the local leaders in front of the community and other political forces. By relying on these two goals, the local leaders will have power stronger. Strengthening and maintaining power are the main objective for the local leaders. Therefore, this paper will attempt to present the ability of the local leaders in maintaining his power through the politics of populism at the local level (Vedi R Hadiz, 2017; Willy Purna Samadhi, 2016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":52771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4802\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33474/jisop.v1i2.4802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
在权力研究中,民粹主义、国防政治和地方领导人是相互关联的。在维持权力的框架内,地方领导人将利用民粹主义政策获得社区的政治支持。社区的支持对选举民主至关重要。因此,地方领导人将以民粹主义政策的形式回应其公民的需求。地方领导人满足公民需求的能力是民粹主义政治工作的重要组成部分。在这种民粹主义政治中,受益者是领导人和社会。然而,受益者更肯定是地方领导人。为什么?是因为地方领导人利用民粹主义政策作为维持权力的工具吗?基于这个问题,民粹主义政策的选择对地方领导人来说有两个目的。第一,从社会中获得合法性。对于地方领导人来说,建立政治权力需要合法性(Ramlan Surbakti,1992;96)。这是因为强大的合法性会让地方领导人更有信心。第二,加强地方领导人在社区和其他政治力量面前的个人能力。依靠这两个目标,地方领导人将拥有更强大的权力。加强和维护权力是地方领导人的主要目标。因此,本文将试图展示地方领导人通过地方层面的民粹主义政治来维持其权力的能力(Vedi R Hadiz,2017;Willy Purna Samadhi,2016)。
Populism, defence politics, and local leader are interrelated in the study of power. In the framework of maintaining power, local leaders will use populist policies to gain political support from the community. Community support is essential in an electoral democracy. Therefore, the local leaders will respond to the needs of its citizens in the form of populist policy. The ability of local leaders to meet the needs of their citizens is an important part of the working of populist politics. In this populist politics, the beneficiaries are leaders and society. Nevertheless, the beneficiaries are more certainly the local leaders. Why? Is it because local leaders use populism policies as instrumentation in maintaining power? By relying on that question, the choice of populist policy is aimed at two things for the local leaders. First, to gain legitimacy from the community. For local leaders, legitimacy is needed in building political power (Ramlan Surbakti, 1992; 96). It’s because the strong legitimacy will make to the local leaders more confident. Second, to strengthen the personal capacity of the local leaders in front of the community and other political forces. By relying on these two goals, the local leaders will have power stronger. Strengthening and maintaining power are the main objective for the local leaders. Therefore, this paper will attempt to present the ability of the local leaders in maintaining his power through the politics of populism at the local level (Vedi R Hadiz, 2017; Willy Purna Samadhi, 2016).