r-ASRM子宫内膜异位症分类系统及其组成部分的观察者内和观察者间再现性,使用编辑的录像腹腔镜手术

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders Pub Date : 2021-11-18 DOI:10.1177/22840265211058085
R. Padmehr, K. Shadjoo, A. Mohazzab, Atefeh Gorgin, R. Kargar, Saba Tarkashvand, S. Khazali
{"title":"r-ASRM子宫内膜异位症分类系统及其组成部分的观察者内和观察者间再现性,使用编辑的录像腹腔镜手术","authors":"R. Padmehr, K. Shadjoo, A. Mohazzab, Atefeh Gorgin, R. Kargar, Saba Tarkashvand, S. Khazali","doi":"10.1177/22840265211058085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several classification systems have been proposed for endometriosis but the search for the ideal system is ongoing. While the most commonly used system has historically been r-ASRM, this system is not fit for purpose, particularly for deep endometriosis. In order to explore strategies to devise a new system and learn from problems with the existing ones, this study was designed to assess the reproducibility of each component in r-ASRM and its total score using videotaped laparoscopic procedures. Two surgeons independently scored 64 edited videos of laparoscopic endometriosis procedure, twice. Using the Kappa statistic, the agreement of the scores given was analyzed. r-ASRM showed a moderate inter-observer agreement (ƙ = 0.503) and good intra-observer agreement (ƙ = 0.774 and 0.682 for scorer 1 and 2 respectively) for overall disease staging. The agreement for each component of the system, however, was highly variable. The least agreement was observed for the peritoneum with ƙ = 0.157 and ƙ = 0.362 respectively for inter-observer and intra-observer. The lowest intra-observer agreement was seen for cul-de-sac for scorer 2 (ƙ = 0.382). Whilst the overall rASRM shows acceptable agreement between two scorers, this agreement seems to be the product of inconsistent scoring for each component.","PeriodicalId":15725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","volume":"13 1","pages":"256 - 261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of r-ASRM endometriosis classification system and its components, using edited videotaped laparoscopic procedures\",\"authors\":\"R. Padmehr, K. Shadjoo, A. Mohazzab, Atefeh Gorgin, R. Kargar, Saba Tarkashvand, S. Khazali\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22840265211058085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several classification systems have been proposed for endometriosis but the search for the ideal system is ongoing. While the most commonly used system has historically been r-ASRM, this system is not fit for purpose, particularly for deep endometriosis. In order to explore strategies to devise a new system and learn from problems with the existing ones, this study was designed to assess the reproducibility of each component in r-ASRM and its total score using videotaped laparoscopic procedures. Two surgeons independently scored 64 edited videos of laparoscopic endometriosis procedure, twice. Using the Kappa statistic, the agreement of the scores given was analyzed. r-ASRM showed a moderate inter-observer agreement (ƙ = 0.503) and good intra-observer agreement (ƙ = 0.774 and 0.682 for scorer 1 and 2 respectively) for overall disease staging. The agreement for each component of the system, however, was highly variable. The least agreement was observed for the peritoneum with ƙ = 0.157 and ƙ = 0.362 respectively for inter-observer and intra-observer. The lowest intra-observer agreement was seen for cul-de-sac for scorer 2 (ƙ = 0.382). Whilst the overall rASRM shows acceptable agreement between two scorers, this agreement seems to be the product of inconsistent scoring for each component.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"256 - 261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265211058085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265211058085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

子宫内膜异位症已经提出了几个分类系统,但理想系统的搜索仍在进行中。虽然历史上最常用的系统是r-ASRM,但该系统不适合使用,尤其是用于深度子宫内膜异位症。为了探索设计新系统的策略,并从现有系统的问题中吸取教训,本研究旨在使用录像腹腔镜手术评估r-ASRM中每个成分的可重复性及其总分。两名外科医生分别两次对腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症手术的64段剪辑视频进行独立评分。使用Kappa统计,分析了给出的分数的一致性。r-ASRM显示出适度的观察者间一致性(ƙ = 0.503)和良好的观察者内部一致性(ƙ = 得分者1和2分别为0.774和0.682)。然而,该系统各组成部分的协议却千差万别。腹膜与ƙ = 0.157和ƙ = 观察者间和观察者内分别为0.362。观察者内部的一致性最低的是记分员2的死胡同(ƙ = 0.382)。虽然总体rASRM显示两个评分者之间存在可接受的一致性,但这种一致性似乎是每个组件评分不一致的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of r-ASRM endometriosis classification system and its components, using edited videotaped laparoscopic procedures
Several classification systems have been proposed for endometriosis but the search for the ideal system is ongoing. While the most commonly used system has historically been r-ASRM, this system is not fit for purpose, particularly for deep endometriosis. In order to explore strategies to devise a new system and learn from problems with the existing ones, this study was designed to assess the reproducibility of each component in r-ASRM and its total score using videotaped laparoscopic procedures. Two surgeons independently scored 64 edited videos of laparoscopic endometriosis procedure, twice. Using the Kappa statistic, the agreement of the scores given was analyzed. r-ASRM showed a moderate inter-observer agreement (ƙ = 0.503) and good intra-observer agreement (ƙ = 0.774 and 0.682 for scorer 1 and 2 respectively) for overall disease staging. The agreement for each component of the system, however, was highly variable. The least agreement was observed for the peritoneum with ƙ = 0.157 and ƙ = 0.362 respectively for inter-observer and intra-observer. The lowest intra-observer agreement was seen for cul-de-sac for scorer 2 (ƙ = 0.382). Whilst the overall rASRM shows acceptable agreement between two scorers, this agreement seems to be the product of inconsistent scoring for each component.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Endometriosis on TikTok: Evaluating social media misinformation and the role of healthcare professionals When cystoscopy catches what laparoscopy misses: The role of cystoscopy in evaluation of bladder endometriosis Comprehensive management of umbilical endometriosis using a unique laparoscopic entry portal (Darwish point) and postoperative Dienogest Chronic pelvic pain: An underrecognised perioperative consideration The Holy Grail of endometriosis biomarkers in the diagnostic process – How much would it be worth and what does it look like?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1