四分之一椭圆楔尖顶后边界层发展的数值模拟

IF 1.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences Pub Date : 2023-06-28 DOI:10.15282/jmes.17.2.2023.1.0745
M. A. Fitriady, N. A. Rahmat, A. F. Mohammad, S.A. Zaki
{"title":"四分之一椭圆楔尖顶后边界层发展的数值模拟","authors":"M. A. Fitriady, N. A. Rahmat, A. F. Mohammad, S.A. Zaki","doi":"10.15282/jmes.17.2.2023.1.0745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades wind tunnel has been utilized to generate a quasi-atmospheric boundary layer to observe the wake flow around objects submerged within the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. The quarter elliptic-wedge spire is the most commonly used as a vortex generator among other passive devices. However, despite numerous past studies that utilize rows of spires to generate deep quasi-ABL, only a few researchers targeted spires as the main subject of their investigation. Hence, the present work originally aims to investigate the wake flow structure behind a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire and its aerodynamic interaction with a smooth wall boundary layer. A computational fluid dynamics simulation predicting the wake flow structure behind a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire was conducted using the OpenFOAM® software. The computational domain consists a smooth flat plate, and a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire. A comparison of two Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence models, namely the k-ɛ model and the SST k-ω model, was conducted. A SIMPLE algorithm was used as the solver in the simulation iteration and ParaFOAM® was used as the post-processing software. The development of the boundary layer height from streamwise x0=0.5S to downwind x0=20S was observed. The mean vertical velocity profiles predicted by both turbulence models are in good agreement with the previous wind tunnel experimental results. However, the results obtained with the k-ɛ model were overpredicted compared to the results of the SST k-ω model causing deviation of the boundary layer height from the wind tunnel experimental data. This anomaly might be caused by the velocity deficit recovery above the boundary layer height region where the turbulence is low.","PeriodicalId":16166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical simulation of the boundary layer development behind a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Fitriady, N. A. Rahmat, A. F. Mohammad, S.A. Zaki\",\"doi\":\"10.15282/jmes.17.2.2023.1.0745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For decades wind tunnel has been utilized to generate a quasi-atmospheric boundary layer to observe the wake flow around objects submerged within the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. The quarter elliptic-wedge spire is the most commonly used as a vortex generator among other passive devices. However, despite numerous past studies that utilize rows of spires to generate deep quasi-ABL, only a few researchers targeted spires as the main subject of their investigation. Hence, the present work originally aims to investigate the wake flow structure behind a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire and its aerodynamic interaction with a smooth wall boundary layer. A computational fluid dynamics simulation predicting the wake flow structure behind a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire was conducted using the OpenFOAM® software. The computational domain consists a smooth flat plate, and a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire. A comparison of two Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence models, namely the k-ɛ model and the SST k-ω model, was conducted. A SIMPLE algorithm was used as the solver in the simulation iteration and ParaFOAM® was used as the post-processing software. The development of the boundary layer height from streamwise x0=0.5S to downwind x0=20S was observed. The mean vertical velocity profiles predicted by both turbulence models are in good agreement with the previous wind tunnel experimental results. However, the results obtained with the k-ɛ model were overpredicted compared to the results of the SST k-ω model causing deviation of the boundary layer height from the wind tunnel experimental data. This anomaly might be caused by the velocity deficit recovery above the boundary layer height region where the turbulence is low.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.17.2.2023.1.0745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.17.2.2023.1.0745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,风洞一直被用来产生准大气边界层,以观察淹没在大气边界层内的物体周围的尾流。四分之一椭圆楔形尖顶是其他无源设备中最常用的涡流发生器。然而,尽管过去有许多研究利用一排排尖塔产生深层准ABL,但只有少数研究人员将尖塔作为他们研究的主要对象。因此,本工作最初旨在研究单四分之一椭圆楔尖顶后面的尾流结构及其与光滑壁边界层的气动相互作用。使用OpenFOAM®软件进行了计算流体动力学模拟,预测了四分之一椭圆楔尖顶后面的尾流结构。计算域由一块光滑的平板和一个四分之一椭圆楔尖顶组成。比较了两种雷诺平均Navier-Stokes湍流模型,即k-κ模型和SST k-ω模型。SIMPLE算法被用作模拟迭代中的求解器,ParaFOAM®被用作后处理软件。观察到边界层高度从顺流方向x0=0.5S到顺风方向x0=20S的发展。两种湍流模型预测的平均垂直速度剖面与之前的风洞实验结果吻合良好。然而,与SST k-ω模型的结果相比,k-ω模型获得的结果被高估了,导致边界层高度与风洞实验数据的偏差。这种异常可能是由湍流较低的边界层高度区域上方的速度不足恢复引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical simulation of the boundary layer development behind a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire
For decades wind tunnel has been utilized to generate a quasi-atmospheric boundary layer to observe the wake flow around objects submerged within the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. The quarter elliptic-wedge spire is the most commonly used as a vortex generator among other passive devices. However, despite numerous past studies that utilize rows of spires to generate deep quasi-ABL, only a few researchers targeted spires as the main subject of their investigation. Hence, the present work originally aims to investigate the wake flow structure behind a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire and its aerodynamic interaction with a smooth wall boundary layer. A computational fluid dynamics simulation predicting the wake flow structure behind a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire was conducted using the OpenFOAM® software. The computational domain consists a smooth flat plate, and a single quarter elliptic-wedge spire. A comparison of two Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence models, namely the k-ɛ model and the SST k-ω model, was conducted. A SIMPLE algorithm was used as the solver in the simulation iteration and ParaFOAM® was used as the post-processing software. The development of the boundary layer height from streamwise x0=0.5S to downwind x0=20S was observed. The mean vertical velocity profiles predicted by both turbulence models are in good agreement with the previous wind tunnel experimental results. However, the results obtained with the k-ɛ model were overpredicted compared to the results of the SST k-ω model causing deviation of the boundary layer height from the wind tunnel experimental data. This anomaly might be caused by the velocity deficit recovery above the boundary layer height region where the turbulence is low.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Engineering & Sciences "JMES" (ISSN (Print): 2289-4659; e-ISSN: 2231-8380) is an open access peer-review journal (Indexed by Emerging Source Citation Index (ESCI), WOS; SCOPUS Index (Elsevier); EBSCOhost; Index Copernicus; Ulrichsweb, DOAJ, Google Scholar) which publishes original and review articles that advance the understanding of both the fundamentals of engineering science and its application to the solution of challenges and problems in mechanical engineering systems, machines and components. It is particularly concerned with the demonstration of engineering science solutions to specific industrial problems. Original contributions providing insight into the use of analytical, computational modeling, structural mechanics, metal forming, behavior and application of advanced materials, impact mechanics, strain localization and other effects of nonlinearity, fluid mechanics, robotics, tribology, thermodynamics, and materials processing generally from the core of the journal contents are encouraged. Only original, innovative and novel papers will be considered for publication in the JMES. The authors are required to confirm that their paper has not been submitted to any other journal in English or any other language. The JMES welcome contributions from all who wishes to report on new developments and latest findings in mechanical engineering.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of collision estimation with vehicle and pedestrian using CARLA simulation software Active suspension for all-terrain vehicle with intelligent control using artificial neural networks The influence of helmet certification in motorcycle helmets protective performance Sustainable considerations in additive manufacturing processes: A review Co-simulation approach for computational aero-acoustic modeling: Investigating wind-induced noise within two-way radio microphone ports cavity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1