杠杆贷款和CLO市场的立法和监管考虑:它们仍然安全吗?

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Structured Finance Pub Date : 2019-11-07 DOI:10.3905/jsf.2019.1.080
Elliot Ganz
{"title":"杠杆贷款和CLO市场的立法和监管考虑:它们仍然安全吗?","authors":"Elliot Ganz","doi":"10.3905/jsf.2019.1.080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In February 2018 the LSTA prevailed in its long legal battle with federal regulators when the DC Circuit Court ruled that CLO managers were not subject to risk retention. With the favorable resolution of that key issue and in light of the hands-off approach to financial regulation, it appeared that the CLO market would be able to continue doing business at historic levels for years to come. However, recent pressures from three different directions are calling that assumption into question. A lawsuit contending that loans are subject to the disclosure and anti-fraud provisions of the securities laws, new capital rules on CLOs published by Japanese regulators, and recent legislation relating to leveraged loans and CLOs introduced in both the House of Representatives and the Senate may change the benign landscape. This article examines the new threats and explains how each could upend the loan and CLO markets. TOPICS: CLOs, CDOs, and other structured credit; legal and regulatory issues for structured finance Key Findings • The leveraged loan and CLO markets successfully navigated regulatory challenges imposed by Dodd–Frank. • CLO issuance has reached record levels in the past few years, operating in a more benign regulatory environment. • Challenges from US and Japanese regulators and a lawsuit that could change the legal status of loans threaten to upend the loan and CLO markets.","PeriodicalId":51968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structured Finance","volume":"25 1","pages":"59 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legislative and Regulatory Considerations in the Leveraged Loan and CLO Markets: Are They Still Safe?\",\"authors\":\"Elliot Ganz\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jsf.2019.1.080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In February 2018 the LSTA prevailed in its long legal battle with federal regulators when the DC Circuit Court ruled that CLO managers were not subject to risk retention. With the favorable resolution of that key issue and in light of the hands-off approach to financial regulation, it appeared that the CLO market would be able to continue doing business at historic levels for years to come. However, recent pressures from three different directions are calling that assumption into question. A lawsuit contending that loans are subject to the disclosure and anti-fraud provisions of the securities laws, new capital rules on CLOs published by Japanese regulators, and recent legislation relating to leveraged loans and CLOs introduced in both the House of Representatives and the Senate may change the benign landscape. This article examines the new threats and explains how each could upend the loan and CLO markets. TOPICS: CLOs, CDOs, and other structured credit; legal and regulatory issues for structured finance Key Findings • The leveraged loan and CLO markets successfully navigated regulatory challenges imposed by Dodd–Frank. • CLO issuance has reached record levels in the past few years, operating in a more benign regulatory environment. • Challenges from US and Japanese regulators and a lawsuit that could change the legal status of loans threaten to upend the loan and CLO markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structured Finance\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"59 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structured Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2019.1.080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structured Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2019.1.080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2018年2月,LSTA在与联邦监管机构的长期法律斗争中获胜,华盛顿特区巡回法院裁定CLO经理不受风险保留的约束。随着这一关键问题的顺利解决,加上对金融监管不干涉的做法,CLO市场似乎能够在未来几年继续以历史水平开展业务。然而,最近来自三个不同方向的压力正在对这一假设提出质疑。一项诉讼声称,贷款受证券法披露和反欺诈条款的约束,日本监管机构发布的clo新资本规则,以及众议院和参议院最近提出的有关杠杆贷款和clo的立法,可能会改变这种良性局面。本文研究了新的威胁,并解释了每种威胁如何颠覆贷款和CLO市场。主题:clo、cdo和其他结构性信贷;•杠杆贷款和CLO市场成功应对了多德-弗兰克法案带来的监管挑战。•CLO发行在过去几年达到创纪录水平,监管环境更加宽松。•来自美国和日本监管机构的挑战,以及一场可能改变贷款法律地位的诉讼,可能会颠覆贷款和CLO市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legislative and Regulatory Considerations in the Leveraged Loan and CLO Markets: Are They Still Safe?
In February 2018 the LSTA prevailed in its long legal battle with federal regulators when the DC Circuit Court ruled that CLO managers were not subject to risk retention. With the favorable resolution of that key issue and in light of the hands-off approach to financial regulation, it appeared that the CLO market would be able to continue doing business at historic levels for years to come. However, recent pressures from three different directions are calling that assumption into question. A lawsuit contending that loans are subject to the disclosure and anti-fraud provisions of the securities laws, new capital rules on CLOs published by Japanese regulators, and recent legislation relating to leveraged loans and CLOs introduced in both the House of Representatives and the Senate may change the benign landscape. This article examines the new threats and explains how each could upend the loan and CLO markets. TOPICS: CLOs, CDOs, and other structured credit; legal and regulatory issues for structured finance Key Findings • The leveraged loan and CLO markets successfully navigated regulatory challenges imposed by Dodd–Frank. • CLO issuance has reached record levels in the past few years, operating in a more benign regulatory environment. • Challenges from US and Japanese regulators and a lawsuit that could change the legal status of loans threaten to upend the loan and CLO markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structured Finance
Journal of Structured Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structured Finance (JSF) is the only international, peer-reviewed journal devoted to empirical analysis and practical guidance on structured finance instruments, techniques, and strategies. JSF covers a wide range of topics including credit derivatives and synthetic securitization, secondary trading in the CDO market, securitization in emerging markets, trends in major consumer loan categories, accounting, regulatory, and tax issues in the structured finance industry.
期刊最新文献
Highlights from the Structured Finance Association Editor’s Letter Unlocking the Resilience of Collateralized Loan Obligations: Exploring Historical Global Performance, Regulatory Scrutiny, and the EU Market’s Innovations Navigating the 2023 US Housing Market: Impact on Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Evolution in the Consumer ABS Market (Past, Present, and Future)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1