{"title":"论维特根斯坦反智主义哲学的局限性","authors":"Daniel Leunbach","doi":"10.5465/amr.2022.0491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7127,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Limitations of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Anti-Intellectualist Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Leunbach\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/amr.2022.0491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":7127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0491\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0491","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
期刊介绍:
The mission of AMR is to publish theoretical insights that advance our understanding of management and organizations. Submissions to AMR must extend theory in ways that develop testable knowledge-based claims. To do this, researchers can develop new management and organization theory, significantly challenge or clarify existing theory, synthesize recent advances and ideas into fresh, if not entirely new theory, or initiate a search for new theory by identifying and delineating a novel theoretical problem. The contributions of AMR articles often are grounded in “normal science disciplines” of economics, psychology, sociology, or social psychology as well as nontraditional perspectives, such as the humanities.