“需要补充”:弥尔顿和他的第一对开本的部分改革

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY Milton Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0047
Benjamin Card, D. Kastan
{"title":"“需要补充”:弥尔顿和他的第一对开本的部分改革","authors":"Benjamin Card, D. Kastan","doi":"10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The response to the identification of John Milton’s Shakespeare in 2019 was deservedly enthusiastic, but the excitement has perhaps resulted in some overstatement of what it tells us about Milton as a reader of Shakespeare or Milton as a textual critic. The marked-up First Folio is an unusual and noteworthy record of a reader’s engagement with the plays, but it does not tell us quite what we want it to, especially now that we know the reader was Milton. Ultimately it tells us less about his understanding of Shakespeare and his texts than about Milton’s understanding of textuality itself.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"65 1","pages":"47 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Wanting a Supplement”: Milton and the Partial Reformation of His First Folio\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Card, D. Kastan\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The response to the identification of John Milton’s Shakespeare in 2019 was deservedly enthusiastic, but the excitement has perhaps resulted in some overstatement of what it tells us about Milton as a reader of Shakespeare or Milton as a textual critic. The marked-up First Folio is an unusual and noteworthy record of a reader’s engagement with the plays, but it does not tell us quite what we want it to, especially now that we know the reader was Milton. Ultimately it tells us less about his understanding of Shakespeare and his texts than about Milton’s understanding of textuality itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Milton Studies\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Milton Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/miltonstudies.65.1.0047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,人们对约翰·弥尔顿的《莎士比亚》的认同反应热烈,这是理所当然的,但这种兴奋可能有些夸大了弥尔顿作为莎士比亚的读者或文本评论家所能告诉我们的。加了记号的《第一对开本》是一个不同寻常的,值得注意的记录,记录了读者对戏剧的参与,但它并没有告诉我们我们想要的东西,尤其是现在我们知道读者就是弥尔顿。最终,它告诉我们的不是他对莎士比亚和他的作品的理解,而是弥尔顿对文本本身的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Wanting a Supplement”: Milton and the Partial Reformation of His First Folio
abstract:The response to the identification of John Milton’s Shakespeare in 2019 was deservedly enthusiastic, but the excitement has perhaps resulted in some overstatement of what it tells us about Milton as a reader of Shakespeare or Milton as a textual critic. The marked-up First Folio is an unusual and noteworthy record of a reader’s engagement with the plays, but it does not tell us quite what we want it to, especially now that we know the reader was Milton. Ultimately it tells us less about his understanding of Shakespeare and his texts than about Milton’s understanding of textuality itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
期刊最新文献
"To All Baptized": The Watery Dissent of Paradise Regained Milton's Second Marriage, the Burials of a Wife and Daughter, and Records from Two Parish Chests Milton and the Uses of Stupidity Milton after Auschwitz “Through a Glass, Darkly”: Paradise Lost and Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1