新冠肺炎疫情后,农村居民比城市居民幸福吗?

Yoko Mayuzumi
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情后,农村居民比城市居民幸福吗?","authors":"Yoko Mayuzumi","doi":"10.1007/s41685-023-00312-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous studies on the happiness levels of people in developing countries showed that urban areas had better healthcare conditions and residents were happier, whereas rural areas were more vulnerable and residents were less happy. Numerous studies have shown that residents of rural areas in developed countries are happier. However, a few studies have comprehensively examined the happiness of residents in rural areas of developing countries. Contrary to the aforementioned statement, people in rural areas may be happier, but this remains to be explored. During the COVID-19 pandemic, people worldwide showed clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, and mental distress (Santomauro in Lancet 398(10312):1700–1712, 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-72021, 2021). Upon lifting lockdown measures and recovering economic activity, primarily due to mass vaccination programs, knowledge about happiness regarding the recovery processes of this mental distress was not enough. Furthermore, a few studies evaluated the mental health and happiness of residents in the rural areas of developing countries during the pandemic. Based on this background, this study analyzed the reality of urban and rural happiness during the pandemic in Bali, a developing country, and aimed to show that rural residents were happier. Higher levels of happiness among rural residents observed in the first survey was confirmed using a second survey. Both chronological surveys were conducted in the same region using the same questionnaire halfway through the COVID-19 pandemic until the near-endemic period. This survey was conducted from June to July 2022. The responses of 280 people from the same districts as the first survey were quantitatively compared. Based on these data, we performed a simple analysis, comparison of means, factor analysis, multiple regression analysis, canonical correlation analysis, and covariance structure analysis. The survey results showed that rural areas did not outperform urban areas in terms of happiness itself. Additionally, happiness levels were mostly unchanged in both areas compared to the previous survey. Residents in rural areas showed decreased medical concerns, better income recovery, and limited patience compared to the earlier results. Alternatively, residents in urban areas showed increased anxiety about medical care, decreased income, and higher levels of loneliness and depression. In other words, the recovery of income and reduced concern about medical care in rural areas were in contrast to the low level of happiness. These results also point to lower levels of happiness among residents in urban areas. Therefore, the happiness recovery level following the pandemic appears better in rural areas and slower in urban areas. That is, the hypothesis was proven correct. Interestingly, the results of this study differ from those of previous studies, which report higher happiness levels among urban residents in developing countries and lower happiness levels among rural residents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36164,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science","volume":"7 4","pages":"1055 - 1090"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After the COVID-19 pandemic, are residents in rural areas happier than those in urban areas?\",\"authors\":\"Yoko Mayuzumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41685-023-00312-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous studies on the happiness levels of people in developing countries showed that urban areas had better healthcare conditions and residents were happier, whereas rural areas were more vulnerable and residents were less happy. Numerous studies have shown that residents of rural areas in developed countries are happier. However, a few studies have comprehensively examined the happiness of residents in rural areas of developing countries. Contrary to the aforementioned statement, people in rural areas may be happier, but this remains to be explored. During the COVID-19 pandemic, people worldwide showed clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, and mental distress (Santomauro in Lancet 398(10312):1700–1712, 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-72021, 2021). Upon lifting lockdown measures and recovering economic activity, primarily due to mass vaccination programs, knowledge about happiness regarding the recovery processes of this mental distress was not enough. Furthermore, a few studies evaluated the mental health and happiness of residents in the rural areas of developing countries during the pandemic. Based on this background, this study analyzed the reality of urban and rural happiness during the pandemic in Bali, a developing country, and aimed to show that rural residents were happier. Higher levels of happiness among rural residents observed in the first survey was confirmed using a second survey. Both chronological surveys were conducted in the same region using the same questionnaire halfway through the COVID-19 pandemic until the near-endemic period. This survey was conducted from June to July 2022. The responses of 280 people from the same districts as the first survey were quantitatively compared. Based on these data, we performed a simple analysis, comparison of means, factor analysis, multiple regression analysis, canonical correlation analysis, and covariance structure analysis. The survey results showed that rural areas did not outperform urban areas in terms of happiness itself. Additionally, happiness levels were mostly unchanged in both areas compared to the previous survey. Residents in rural areas showed decreased medical concerns, better income recovery, and limited patience compared to the earlier results. Alternatively, residents in urban areas showed increased anxiety about medical care, decreased income, and higher levels of loneliness and depression. In other words, the recovery of income and reduced concern about medical care in rural areas were in contrast to the low level of happiness. These results also point to lower levels of happiness among residents in urban areas. Therefore, the happiness recovery level following the pandemic appears better in rural areas and slower in urban areas. That is, the hypothesis was proven correct. Interestingly, the results of this study differ from those of previous studies, which report higher happiness levels among urban residents in developing countries and lower happiness levels among rural residents.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"1055 - 1090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41685-023-00312-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41685-023-00312-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以前对发展中国家人民幸福水平的研究表明,城市地区有更好的医疗条件,居民更幸福,而农村地区更脆弱,居民更不幸福。许多研究表明,发达国家农村地区的居民更幸福。然而,很少有研究对发展中国家农村居民的幸福感进行了全面的调查。与上述说法相反,农村地区的人可能更幸福,但这还有待研究。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,世界各地的人们表现出临床显著的抑郁、焦虑和精神痛苦(Santomauro in Lancet 398(10312): 1700-1712, 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-72021, 2021)。在解除封锁措施、恢复经济活动(主要是由于大规模疫苗接种计划)之后,人们对这种精神痛苦恢复过程的幸福感认识还不够。此外,一些研究评估了大流行期间发展中国家农村地区居民的心理健康和幸福感。基于此背景,本研究分析了发展中国家巴厘岛在疫情期间的城乡幸福现实,旨在表明农村居民更幸福。在第一次调查中观察到的农村居民更高的幸福水平在第二次调查中得到了证实。两项按时间顺序进行的调查都是在同一地区进行的,在COVID-19大流行的中期直到接近流行期,使用了相同的问卷。该调查于2022年6月至7月进行。与第一次调查相同地区的280人的回答进行了定量比较。基于这些数据,我们进行了简单分析、均值比较、因子分析、多元回归分析、典型相关分析和协方差结构分析。调查结果显示,就幸福感本身而言,农村地区的表现并不优于城市地区。此外,与之前的调查相比,这两个地区的幸福水平基本没有变化。与早期的结果相比,农村地区居民的医疗担忧减少,收入恢复更好,耐心有限。另一方面,城市地区的居民对医疗保健、收入减少、孤独感和抑郁程度更高表现出更大的焦虑。换句话说,农村地区收入的恢复和对医疗保健的关注的减少与幸福感的低水平形成对比。这些结果还表明,城市居民的幸福水平较低。因此,大流行之后,农村地区的幸福感恢复水平似乎较好,而城市地区则较慢。也就是说,假设被证明是正确的。有趣的是,这项研究的结果与之前的研究结果不同,这些研究报告了发展中国家城市居民的幸福感水平较高,而农村居民的幸福感水平较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
After the COVID-19 pandemic, are residents in rural areas happier than those in urban areas?

Previous studies on the happiness levels of people in developing countries showed that urban areas had better healthcare conditions and residents were happier, whereas rural areas were more vulnerable and residents were less happy. Numerous studies have shown that residents of rural areas in developed countries are happier. However, a few studies have comprehensively examined the happiness of residents in rural areas of developing countries. Contrary to the aforementioned statement, people in rural areas may be happier, but this remains to be explored. During the COVID-19 pandemic, people worldwide showed clinically significant levels of depression, anxiety, and mental distress (Santomauro in Lancet 398(10312):1700–1712, 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-72021, 2021). Upon lifting lockdown measures and recovering economic activity, primarily due to mass vaccination programs, knowledge about happiness regarding the recovery processes of this mental distress was not enough. Furthermore, a few studies evaluated the mental health and happiness of residents in the rural areas of developing countries during the pandemic. Based on this background, this study analyzed the reality of urban and rural happiness during the pandemic in Bali, a developing country, and aimed to show that rural residents were happier. Higher levels of happiness among rural residents observed in the first survey was confirmed using a second survey. Both chronological surveys were conducted in the same region using the same questionnaire halfway through the COVID-19 pandemic until the near-endemic period. This survey was conducted from June to July 2022. The responses of 280 people from the same districts as the first survey were quantitatively compared. Based on these data, we performed a simple analysis, comparison of means, factor analysis, multiple regression analysis, canonical correlation analysis, and covariance structure analysis. The survey results showed that rural areas did not outperform urban areas in terms of happiness itself. Additionally, happiness levels were mostly unchanged in both areas compared to the previous survey. Residents in rural areas showed decreased medical concerns, better income recovery, and limited patience compared to the earlier results. Alternatively, residents in urban areas showed increased anxiety about medical care, decreased income, and higher levels of loneliness and depression. In other words, the recovery of income and reduced concern about medical care in rural areas were in contrast to the low level of happiness. These results also point to lower levels of happiness among residents in urban areas. Therefore, the happiness recovery level following the pandemic appears better in rural areas and slower in urban areas. That is, the hypothesis was proven correct. Interestingly, the results of this study differ from those of previous studies, which report higher happiness levels among urban residents in developing countries and lower happiness levels among rural residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science expands the frontiers of regional science through the diffusion of intrinsically developed and advanced modern, regional science methodologies throughout the Asia-Pacific region. Articles published in the journal foster progress and development of regional science through the promotion of comprehensive and interdisciplinary academic studies in relationship to research in regional science across the globe. The journal’s scope includes articles dedicated to theoretical economics, positive economics including econometrics and statistical analysis and input–output analysis, CGE, Simulation, applied economics including international economics, regional economics, industrial organization, analysis of governance and institutional issues, law and economics, migration and labor markets, spatial economics, land economics, urban economics, agricultural economics, environmental economics, behavioral economics and spatial analysis with GIS/RS data education economics, sociology including urban sociology, rural sociology, environmental sociology and educational sociology, as well as traffic engineering. The journal provides a unique platform for its research community to further develop, analyze, and resolve urgent regional and urban issues in Asia, and to further refine established research around the world in this multidisciplinary field. The journal invites original articles, proposals, and book reviews.The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science is a new English-language journal that spun out of Chiikigakukenkyuu, which has a 45-year history of publishing the best Japanese research in regional science in the Japanese language and, more recently and more frequently, in English. The development of regional science as an international discipline has necessitated the need for a new publication in English. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science is a publishing vehicle for English-language contributions to the field in Japan, across the complete Asia-Pacific arena, and beyond.Content published in this journal is peer reviewed (Double Blind).
期刊最新文献
Five-dimensional unequally weighted mapping methodology for measuring the level of human development: an application in Bagmati Province, Nepal Effects of regional network economies on industrial productivity in Japan: dynamic total factor productivity function approach Impacts of financial globalization on CO2 emissions in Asian countries and implications for Vietnam Is E-commerce an opportunity for boosting employment in developing countries? a study for the Chilean case Uncovering embodied carbon emissions network between China and major regional economies with consideration of China’s trade structure optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1