宗教激进主义的学术研究

AlAlbab Pub Date : 2019-12-30 DOI:10.24260/ALALBAB.V8I2.1276
Akhmad Siddiq
{"title":"宗教激进主义的学术研究","authors":"Akhmad Siddiq","doi":"10.24260/ALALBAB.V8I2.1276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blaming or demonizing other could appear from misunderstanding paradigm toward knowledgeable entities: individually or collectively. Inclusive approach to know and understand other religious groups is a basic principle to build interreligious relation. In his Dialogue Decalogue, Leonard Swidler suggests that to build interfaith dialogue is to learn and understand (other) realities. In this regard, religious radicalism could be perceived as an outcome of misunderstanding that allows people to exclude or ignore others. This paper aims to explore several books of Muslim scholars, both in classical and contemporary period, relating to comparative study of religion. It is the finding of this work that understanding other religions (or religious others) as articulated in the book will create a level of acceptance within religious believers.","PeriodicalId":31284,"journal":{"name":"AlAlbab","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Approach for Religious Radicalism\",\"authors\":\"Akhmad Siddiq\",\"doi\":\"10.24260/ALALBAB.V8I2.1276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Blaming or demonizing other could appear from misunderstanding paradigm toward knowledgeable entities: individually or collectively. Inclusive approach to know and understand other religious groups is a basic principle to build interreligious relation. In his Dialogue Decalogue, Leonard Swidler suggests that to build interfaith dialogue is to learn and understand (other) realities. In this regard, religious radicalism could be perceived as an outcome of misunderstanding that allows people to exclude or ignore others. This paper aims to explore several books of Muslim scholars, both in classical and contemporary period, relating to comparative study of religion. It is the finding of this work that understanding other religions (or religious others) as articulated in the book will create a level of acceptance within religious believers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AlAlbab\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AlAlbab\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24260/ALALBAB.V8I2.1276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlAlbab","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24260/ALALBAB.V8I2.1276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

指责或妖魔化他人可能出现在对知识实体的误解范式中:个人或集体。了解和理解其他宗教团体的包容性方法是建立宗教间关系的基本原则。伦纳德·斯维德勒在他的对话十诫中建议,建立不同信仰间的对话就是学习和理解(其他)现实。在这方面,宗教激进主义可能被视为误解的结果,使人们能够排斥或忽视他人。本文旨在探讨穆斯林学者的几本关于宗教比较研究的书,无论是在古典时期还是在当代。这项工作的发现是,理解书中阐述的其他宗教(或其他宗教)将在宗教信徒中产生一定程度的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Academic Approach for Religious Radicalism
Blaming or demonizing other could appear from misunderstanding paradigm toward knowledgeable entities: individually or collectively. Inclusive approach to know and understand other religious groups is a basic principle to build interreligious relation. In his Dialogue Decalogue, Leonard Swidler suggests that to build interfaith dialogue is to learn and understand (other) realities. In this regard, religious radicalism could be perceived as an outcome of misunderstanding that allows people to exclude or ignore others. This paper aims to explore several books of Muslim scholars, both in classical and contemporary period, relating to comparative study of religion. It is the finding of this work that understanding other religions (or religious others) as articulated in the book will create a level of acceptance within religious believers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Existence of Kaharingan Within Dayak Identity in West Kalimantan Religious Moderation in Indonesian Context Indonesian Baha’i Community’s Perspective on Gender Equality Umpasa and Umpama in Batak Toba Culture as A Means of Catechism in Medan Catholic Churches Kampung Beting: Family Resilience Against Religious Radicalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1