生态保育

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Australasian Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14486563.2023.2192112
Mervyn Mason, H. Ross
{"title":"生态保育","authors":"Mervyn Mason, H. Ross","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2023.2192112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the latest United Nations Biodiversity Conference (colloquially known as ‘COP15’) still fresh in our minds, this special issue focusing on the ecology of Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand comes at an opportune time. What the COP15 made starkly obvious was that biodiversity underpins human societies across the planet – biodiversity being defined at the genetic, species, and ecosystems levels. There was recognition at the COP15 that the world needed to halt the alarming rate of biodiversity decline and embark on urgent restoration of natural ecosystems to stem the current rate of loss of species and ecosystems, which is recognised as the sixth mass extinction (Cowie, Bouchet, and Fontaine 2022). The rate of loss of all levels of biodiversity is very concerning, not only from our desire to have our grandchildren being able to see koalas and Sumatran tigers in the wild, for example, but also because of the likely catastrophic flow-on effects to human society, which at the same time needs to adapt to a changing climate. To that end, the COP15 identified a set of four global goals and 23 targets to protect biodiversity by 2030. Target 3, one of the more ambitious targets, is the call for the conservation and management of at least 30 percent of the planet’s terrestrial, aquatic, and marine areas through ‘ecologically-representative, well-connected, and equitably-governed systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation, recognising indigenous and traditional territories and practices’ (Convention on Biological Diversity 2022). Under some of the other targets, there is an identified need to restore biodiversity, to reduce loss of areas of high biodiversity value, to reduce pollution and run-off, to cut global food waste, phase out government subsidies that harm biodiversity, increase funding for biodiversity conservation and financial flows to developing nations, to improve the management of invasive species, and require transparent disclosure by companies on their impacts to biodiversity. Effective legislation, and its implementation, is critical for protecting biodiversity and ecosystems. In parallel with the international emphasis on the need to improve on biodiversity and ecosystem management and conservation, as put forward at the COP15, the Australian Government has committed to improving the implementation and policing of the national Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, while the Aotearoa-New Zealand Government is in the process of implementing a new Natural and Built Environment Bill (see Knight-Lenihan, this issue). The intent of these cornerstone pieces of legislation is to protect biodiversity and ecosystems, while balancing that protection with development. The biodiversity and ecosystems of Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand are unique, reflecting a diversity, and concomitant endemism, that has largely evolved in isolation from the rest of the world. Nonetheless, that uniqueness has also been greatly influenced by human endeavours for thousands of years. This relationship that humans have with biodiversity and ecosystems within Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand is still very relevant, although probably not well acknowledged. Although for the most part, we live in highly developed societies, with most of us living in built-up towns and cities, seemingly divorced from biodiversity and its influences, we all have a strong intrinsic and extrinsic relationship with biodiversity and ecosystems: for example, the tangible values that catching fish on the","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecology and conservation\",\"authors\":\"Mervyn Mason, H. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14486563.2023.2192112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the latest United Nations Biodiversity Conference (colloquially known as ‘COP15’) still fresh in our minds, this special issue focusing on the ecology of Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand comes at an opportune time. What the COP15 made starkly obvious was that biodiversity underpins human societies across the planet – biodiversity being defined at the genetic, species, and ecosystems levels. There was recognition at the COP15 that the world needed to halt the alarming rate of biodiversity decline and embark on urgent restoration of natural ecosystems to stem the current rate of loss of species and ecosystems, which is recognised as the sixth mass extinction (Cowie, Bouchet, and Fontaine 2022). The rate of loss of all levels of biodiversity is very concerning, not only from our desire to have our grandchildren being able to see koalas and Sumatran tigers in the wild, for example, but also because of the likely catastrophic flow-on effects to human society, which at the same time needs to adapt to a changing climate. To that end, the COP15 identified a set of four global goals and 23 targets to protect biodiversity by 2030. Target 3, one of the more ambitious targets, is the call for the conservation and management of at least 30 percent of the planet’s terrestrial, aquatic, and marine areas through ‘ecologically-representative, well-connected, and equitably-governed systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation, recognising indigenous and traditional territories and practices’ (Convention on Biological Diversity 2022). Under some of the other targets, there is an identified need to restore biodiversity, to reduce loss of areas of high biodiversity value, to reduce pollution and run-off, to cut global food waste, phase out government subsidies that harm biodiversity, increase funding for biodiversity conservation and financial flows to developing nations, to improve the management of invasive species, and require transparent disclosure by companies on their impacts to biodiversity. Effective legislation, and its implementation, is critical for protecting biodiversity and ecosystems. In parallel with the international emphasis on the need to improve on biodiversity and ecosystem management and conservation, as put forward at the COP15, the Australian Government has committed to improving the implementation and policing of the national Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, while the Aotearoa-New Zealand Government is in the process of implementing a new Natural and Built Environment Bill (see Knight-Lenihan, this issue). The intent of these cornerstone pieces of legislation is to protect biodiversity and ecosystems, while balancing that protection with development. The biodiversity and ecosystems of Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand are unique, reflecting a diversity, and concomitant endemism, that has largely evolved in isolation from the rest of the world. Nonetheless, that uniqueness has also been greatly influenced by human endeavours for thousands of years. This relationship that humans have with biodiversity and ecosystems within Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand is still very relevant, although probably not well acknowledged. Although for the most part, we live in highly developed societies, with most of us living in built-up towns and cities, seemingly divorced from biodiversity and its influences, we all have a strong intrinsic and extrinsic relationship with biodiversity and ecosystems: for example, the tangible values that catching fish on the\",\"PeriodicalId\":46081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2192112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2023.2192112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的联合国生物多样性大会(俗称“COP15”)仍在我们的脑海中鲜活,这期关注澳大利亚和新西兰的生态的特刊恰逢其时。COP15明确表明,生物多样性是整个地球上人类社会的基础——生物多样性是在基因、物种和生态系统层面定义的。在COP15上,人们认识到,世界需要遏制生物多样性下降的惊人速度,并着手紧急恢复自然生态系统,以遏制目前物种和生态系统的丧失速度,这被认为是第六次大灭绝(Cowie, Bouchet, and Fontaine, 2022)。各级生物多样性的丧失速度非常令人担忧,这不仅是因为我们希望我们的子孙能够看到考拉和苏门答腊虎等野生动物,还因为这可能对人类社会造成灾难性的连锁影响,同时人类社会需要适应不断变化的气候。为此,COP15确定了到2030年保护生物多样性的四项全球目标和23项具体目标。目标3是更为雄心勃勃的目标之一,它呼吁通过“具有生态代表性、联系良好、管理公平的保护区系统和其他有效的基于区域的保护,同时承认土著和传统领土和做法”(《2022年生物多样性公约》),保护和管理地球上至少30%的陆地、水生和海洋区域。在其他一些目标下,有必要恢复生物多样性,减少生物多样性高价值地区的损失,减少污染和径流,减少全球粮食浪费,逐步取消损害生物多样性的政府补贴,增加生物多样性保护的资金和对发展中国家的资金流动,改善入侵物种的管理,并要求公司透明地披露其对生物多样性的影响。有效的立法及其实施对保护生物多样性和生态系统至关重要。在国际上强调需要改善生物多样性和生态系统的管理和保护的同时,正如COP15所提出的那样,澳大利亚政府已承诺改善1999年国家环境保护和生物多样性保护法的实施和监管,而Aotearoa-New Zealand政府正在实施一项新的自然和建筑环境法案(见Knight-Lenihan,本期)。这些基础立法的目的是保护生物多样性和生态系统,同时在保护与发展之间取得平衡。澳大利亚和奥特罗瓦-新西兰的生物多样性和生态系统是独特的,反映了一种多样性和伴随而来的地方性,这种多样性和地方性在很大程度上是在与世界其他地区隔绝的情况下发展起来的。尽管如此,这种独特性也受到了数千年来人类活动的极大影响。人类与澳大利亚和新西兰的生物多样性和生态系统之间的这种关系仍然非常相关,尽管可能没有得到很好的承认。虽然在很大程度上,我们生活在高度发达的社会中,我们大多数人生活在建筑密集的城镇和城市中,似乎与生物多样性及其影响脱节,但我们都与生物多样性和生态系统有着强烈的内在和外在关系:例如,在海洋上捕鱼的有形价值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecology and conservation
With the latest United Nations Biodiversity Conference (colloquially known as ‘COP15’) still fresh in our minds, this special issue focusing on the ecology of Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand comes at an opportune time. What the COP15 made starkly obvious was that biodiversity underpins human societies across the planet – biodiversity being defined at the genetic, species, and ecosystems levels. There was recognition at the COP15 that the world needed to halt the alarming rate of biodiversity decline and embark on urgent restoration of natural ecosystems to stem the current rate of loss of species and ecosystems, which is recognised as the sixth mass extinction (Cowie, Bouchet, and Fontaine 2022). The rate of loss of all levels of biodiversity is very concerning, not only from our desire to have our grandchildren being able to see koalas and Sumatran tigers in the wild, for example, but also because of the likely catastrophic flow-on effects to human society, which at the same time needs to adapt to a changing climate. To that end, the COP15 identified a set of four global goals and 23 targets to protect biodiversity by 2030. Target 3, one of the more ambitious targets, is the call for the conservation and management of at least 30 percent of the planet’s terrestrial, aquatic, and marine areas through ‘ecologically-representative, well-connected, and equitably-governed systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation, recognising indigenous and traditional territories and practices’ (Convention on Biological Diversity 2022). Under some of the other targets, there is an identified need to restore biodiversity, to reduce loss of areas of high biodiversity value, to reduce pollution and run-off, to cut global food waste, phase out government subsidies that harm biodiversity, increase funding for biodiversity conservation and financial flows to developing nations, to improve the management of invasive species, and require transparent disclosure by companies on their impacts to biodiversity. Effective legislation, and its implementation, is critical for protecting biodiversity and ecosystems. In parallel with the international emphasis on the need to improve on biodiversity and ecosystem management and conservation, as put forward at the COP15, the Australian Government has committed to improving the implementation and policing of the national Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, while the Aotearoa-New Zealand Government is in the process of implementing a new Natural and Built Environment Bill (see Knight-Lenihan, this issue). The intent of these cornerstone pieces of legislation is to protect biodiversity and ecosystems, while balancing that protection with development. The biodiversity and ecosystems of Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand are unique, reflecting a diversity, and concomitant endemism, that has largely evolved in isolation from the rest of the world. Nonetheless, that uniqueness has also been greatly influenced by human endeavours for thousands of years. This relationship that humans have with biodiversity and ecosystems within Australia and Aotearoa-New Zealand is still very relevant, although probably not well acknowledged. Although for the most part, we live in highly developed societies, with most of us living in built-up towns and cities, seemingly divorced from biodiversity and its influences, we all have a strong intrinsic and extrinsic relationship with biodiversity and ecosystems: for example, the tangible values that catching fish on the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Bioanalytical tools in water quality assessment (2nd ed.) Bioanalytical tools in water quality assessment (2nd ed.) , by Beate Escher, Peta Neale, and Frederic Leusch, London, UK, IWA Publishing, 2021, 462 pp., £115 (paperback), ISBN: 9781789061970 Farm dam accounting for healthy and safe agricultural catchments A property rights schema for cultural flows in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia How environmental beliefs influence the acceptance of reallocating government budgets to improving coastal water quality: a hybrid choice model Activating electricity system demand response for commercial and industrial organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1