佛教对中国政治思想可能的影响

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Studies in Chinese Religions Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776
T. Barrett
{"title":"佛教对中国政治思想可能的影响","authors":"T. Barrett","doi":"10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Proponents of twentieth century Chinese critiques of pre-modern Chinese autocracy could point to one or two earlier examples of negative views of autocratic rule, but the ultimate origin of these views has been hard to identify. In pre-modern Chinese accounts of the beginnings of human society, the position of ruler was generally described as an institution established as it were from above, by ‘sages,’ or perhaps by Heaven. Buddhism has by contrast a more negative account of the origins of kingship as representing an expedient, collective human response to problems of social conflict. The introduction into apparently secular discourse during Tang times of an account of the origins of kingship lacking any role for ‘sages’ or for Heaven is therefore tentatively attributed here to tacit Buddhist influence. It is suggested that quite possibly Buddhist ideas can lie behind texts that do not exhibit Buddhist modes of expression, and that such may be the case for this author on kingship, Liu Zongyuan 柳宗元 (773–819).","PeriodicalId":36684,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Chinese Religions","volume":"4 1","pages":"341 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought\",\"authors\":\"T. Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Proponents of twentieth century Chinese critiques of pre-modern Chinese autocracy could point to one or two earlier examples of negative views of autocratic rule, but the ultimate origin of these views has been hard to identify. In pre-modern Chinese accounts of the beginnings of human society, the position of ruler was generally described as an institution established as it were from above, by ‘sages,’ or perhaps by Heaven. Buddhism has by contrast a more negative account of the origins of kingship as representing an expedient, collective human response to problems of social conflict. The introduction into apparently secular discourse during Tang times of an account of the origins of kingship lacking any role for ‘sages’ or for Heaven is therefore tentatively attributed here to tacit Buddhist influence. It is suggested that quite possibly Buddhist ideas can lie behind texts that do not exhibit Buddhist modes of expression, and that such may be the case for this author on kingship, Liu Zongyuan 柳宗元 (773–819).\",\"PeriodicalId\":36684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Chinese Religions\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"341 - 354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Chinese Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1095\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Chinese Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23729988.2018.1560776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪中国人对前现代中国专制的批评的支持者可以指出一两个早期的专制统治负面观点的例子,但这些观点的最终来源很难确定。在前现代中国人对人类社会开端的描述中,统治者的地位通常被描述为一种由“圣人”或天堂建立的制度。相比之下,佛教对王权的起源有着更负面的描述,认为王权代表了人类对社会冲突问题的权宜之计和集体反应。因此,在唐代,在明显的世俗话语中引入了一种对王权起源的描述,而这种描述缺乏对“圣贤”或天堂的任何作用,在这里被暂时归因于隐含的佛教影响。有人认为,佛教思想很可能隐藏在没有佛教表达方式的文本背后,而这位关于王权的作者柳宗元可能就是这样柳宗元 (773–819)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A possible Buddhist influence on Chinese political thought
ABSTRACT Proponents of twentieth century Chinese critiques of pre-modern Chinese autocracy could point to one or two earlier examples of negative views of autocratic rule, but the ultimate origin of these views has been hard to identify. In pre-modern Chinese accounts of the beginnings of human society, the position of ruler was generally described as an institution established as it were from above, by ‘sages,’ or perhaps by Heaven. Buddhism has by contrast a more negative account of the origins of kingship as representing an expedient, collective human response to problems of social conflict. The introduction into apparently secular discourse during Tang times of an account of the origins of kingship lacking any role for ‘sages’ or for Heaven is therefore tentatively attributed here to tacit Buddhist influence. It is suggested that quite possibly Buddhist ideas can lie behind texts that do not exhibit Buddhist modes of expression, and that such may be the case for this author on kingship, Liu Zongyuan 柳宗元 (773–819).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Chinese Religions
Studies in Chinese Religions Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
What is left of the Zhongjing bielu 眾經別錄 Engendering thunder: Imperial consorts, thunder ritual and the power of Daoist material culture at the Ming court All life is interconnected: elite Buddhist responses to environmental destruction in the early Anthropocene Dimming the radiance to mingle with dust: Ximing temple as a confluence of historical elements Dark wind for seven days and nights: a Chinese apocalyptic disaster
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1