“疫苗影响者”:对推特上批评COVID-19疫苗接种工作的有影响力声音和负面疫苗信息话语的研究

IF 1.8 Q2 COMMUNICATION COMMUNICATION REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1080/10714421.2023.2214057
Catherine E. Slavik, N. Yiannakoulias, Charlotte Buttle, J. Darlington
{"title":"“疫苗影响者”:对推特上批评COVID-19疫苗接种工作的有影响力声音和负面疫苗信息话语的研究","authors":"Catherine E. Slavik, N. Yiannakoulias, Charlotte Buttle, J. Darlington","doi":"10.1080/10714421.2023.2214057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In late 2020, the large-scale rollout of COVID-19 vaccines to combat the global pandemic ignited a firestorm of debates and media discourse on vaccines. We conducted a discourse analysis of tweets (n = 875) criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination process and/or containing negative vaccine information (NVI) authored by influential Twitter accounts receiving the highest user engagement. Results showed news media and private citizens to be important influencers of NVI discourse criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination process on Twitter. The most frequently expressed beliefs centered around ineffective vaccine policies and inadequate government responses. A content analysis revealed that on average, tweets criticizing a broader inadequate public health response were the most retweeted. Statistically significant differences in vaccine discourse were found between Canada and the United States, underscoring the importance of local context-specific factors that influence how Twitter users construct issues related to COVID-19 vaccination. Our results suggest that satisfaction with the leaders in charge of the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines may have depended more on how those leaders acted rather than actual vaccination rates. Studying concerns and criticisms toward vaccination and NVI are key to identifying areas of change in vaccine policies and programs that citizens and other actors want to see implemented.","PeriodicalId":46140,"journal":{"name":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","volume":"26 1","pages":"300 - 322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Vaccinfluencers’: a study of influential voices criticizing COVID-19 vaccination efforts and negative vaccine information discourse on Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Catherine E. Slavik, N. Yiannakoulias, Charlotte Buttle, J. Darlington\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10714421.2023.2214057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In late 2020, the large-scale rollout of COVID-19 vaccines to combat the global pandemic ignited a firestorm of debates and media discourse on vaccines. We conducted a discourse analysis of tweets (n = 875) criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination process and/or containing negative vaccine information (NVI) authored by influential Twitter accounts receiving the highest user engagement. Results showed news media and private citizens to be important influencers of NVI discourse criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination process on Twitter. The most frequently expressed beliefs centered around ineffective vaccine policies and inadequate government responses. A content analysis revealed that on average, tweets criticizing a broader inadequate public health response were the most retweeted. Statistically significant differences in vaccine discourse were found between Canada and the United States, underscoring the importance of local context-specific factors that influence how Twitter users construct issues related to COVID-19 vaccination. Our results suggest that satisfaction with the leaders in charge of the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines may have depended more on how those leaders acted rather than actual vaccination rates. Studying concerns and criticisms toward vaccination and NVI are key to identifying areas of change in vaccine policies and programs that citizens and other actors want to see implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMUNICATION REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"300 - 322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMUNICATION REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2023.2214057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMUNICATION REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2023.2214057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年底,为应对全球大流行而大规模推出的COVID-19疫苗引发了关于疫苗的辩论和媒体话语的风暴。我们对用户参与度最高的有影响力的Twitter账户撰写的批评COVID-19疫苗接种过程和/或包含负面疫苗信息(NVI)的推文(n = 875)进行了话语分析。结果显示,新闻媒体和普通公民是推特上批评COVID-19疫苗接种过程的NVI话语的重要影响者。最常表达的信念集中在疫苗政策无效和政府应对不力。一项内容分析显示,平均而言,批评公共卫生应对不力的推文被转发最多。加拿大和美国在疫苗话语方面存在统计学上的显著差异,强调了影响Twitter用户如何构建与COVID-19疫苗接种相关问题的当地特定背景因素的重要性。我们的研究结果表明,对负责推出COVID-19疫苗的领导人的满意度可能更多地取决于这些领导人的行动方式,而不是实际的疫苗接种率。研究对疫苗接种和NVI的关注和批评是确定公民和其他行为者希望看到实施的疫苗政策和计划的变化领域的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Vaccinfluencers’: a study of influential voices criticizing COVID-19 vaccination efforts and negative vaccine information discourse on Twitter
ABSTRACT In late 2020, the large-scale rollout of COVID-19 vaccines to combat the global pandemic ignited a firestorm of debates and media discourse on vaccines. We conducted a discourse analysis of tweets (n = 875) criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination process and/or containing negative vaccine information (NVI) authored by influential Twitter accounts receiving the highest user engagement. Results showed news media and private citizens to be important influencers of NVI discourse criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination process on Twitter. The most frequently expressed beliefs centered around ineffective vaccine policies and inadequate government responses. A content analysis revealed that on average, tweets criticizing a broader inadequate public health response were the most retweeted. Statistically significant differences in vaccine discourse were found between Canada and the United States, underscoring the importance of local context-specific factors that influence how Twitter users construct issues related to COVID-19 vaccination. Our results suggest that satisfaction with the leaders in charge of the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines may have depended more on how those leaders acted rather than actual vaccination rates. Studying concerns and criticisms toward vaccination and NVI are key to identifying areas of change in vaccine policies and programs that citizens and other actors want to see implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMMUNICATION REVIEW
COMMUNICATION REVIEW COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The assimilated secret: Understanding as silence in Japanese LGBT discourse Skilling communication: The discourse and metadiscourse of communication in self-help books Young climate activists in television news: An analysis of multimodal constructions of voice, political recognition, and co-optation Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood How U.S.-based children’s news show CNN 10 reproduces neoliberal hegemony: A critical discourse analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1