pellita F.Muell.和圆叶桉的纸浆和造纸潜力评价

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE Revista do Instituto Florestal Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.24278/2178-5031.202133202
E. P. Amorim, J. R. Menucelli, Caio Henrique Santos, Miguel Luiz Menezes Freitas, T. Pissarra, Maria Emília Calvão Moreira da Silva, M. Zanata, Eduardo Luiz Longui
{"title":"pellita F.Muell.和圆叶桉的纸浆和造纸潜力评价","authors":"E. P. Amorim, J. R. Menucelli, Caio Henrique Santos, Miguel Luiz Menezes Freitas, T. Pissarra, Maria Emília Calvão Moreira da Silva, M. Zanata, Eduardo Luiz Longui","doi":"10.24278/2178-5031.202133202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aimed to determine the quality indexes for paper and cellulose based on the fiber features from two wood species of interest, Eucalyptus pellita and E. tereticornis. The mean annual increment (IMA) was calculated by measuring DBH and Height (25 years), a 10 cm disk from each tree was collected for density determinations and anatomical studies for cellulose and paper. Tree height, trunk diameter at 1.30 m in height (DBH), and volume per tree were higher in E. pellita when compared to E. tereticornis. The volume per hectare and average annual increment were higher in E. tereticornis compared to E. pellita. Based on the quality indexes calculated from fiber dimensions, we did not observe any variation in flexibility coefficient between the two species; however, this index was more heterogeneous with the lowest value in E. tereticornis pith. Eucalyptus pellita showed a lower wall fraction value, including a lower overall value in pith. The Runkel index was lowest in E. pellita; in addition, the highest value, above 1, was found in pith position in E. tereticornis. The slenderness index did not differ between species and it was not possible to detect which had performed better. The results indicate that E. pellita and E. tereticornis have potential for the production of paper with high mechanical resistance, such as writing, printing and packaging. The wood of both species has potential for use in producing paper and cellulose.","PeriodicalId":30226,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto Florestal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WOOD EVALUATION OF Eucalyptus pellita F.Muell. AND Eucalyptus tereticornis Smith AS POTENTIAL FOR PULP AND PAPER PRODUCTION\",\"authors\":\"E. P. Amorim, J. R. Menucelli, Caio Henrique Santos, Miguel Luiz Menezes Freitas, T. Pissarra, Maria Emília Calvão Moreira da Silva, M. Zanata, Eduardo Luiz Longui\",\"doi\":\"10.24278/2178-5031.202133202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aimed to determine the quality indexes for paper and cellulose based on the fiber features from two wood species of interest, Eucalyptus pellita and E. tereticornis. The mean annual increment (IMA) was calculated by measuring DBH and Height (25 years), a 10 cm disk from each tree was collected for density determinations and anatomical studies for cellulose and paper. Tree height, trunk diameter at 1.30 m in height (DBH), and volume per tree were higher in E. pellita when compared to E. tereticornis. The volume per hectare and average annual increment were higher in E. tereticornis compared to E. pellita. Based on the quality indexes calculated from fiber dimensions, we did not observe any variation in flexibility coefficient between the two species; however, this index was more heterogeneous with the lowest value in E. tereticornis pith. Eucalyptus pellita showed a lower wall fraction value, including a lower overall value in pith. The Runkel index was lowest in E. pellita; in addition, the highest value, above 1, was found in pith position in E. tereticornis. The slenderness index did not differ between species and it was not possible to detect which had performed better. The results indicate that E. pellita and E. tereticornis have potential for the production of paper with high mechanical resistance, such as writing, printing and packaging. The wood of both species has potential for use in producing paper and cellulose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista do Instituto Florestal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista do Instituto Florestal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24278/2178-5031.202133202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, ROMANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto Florestal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24278/2178-5031.202133202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在根据两种感兴趣的木材的纤维特征,确定纸张和纤维素的质量指标。通过测量DBH和高度(25年)计算平均年增量(IMA),从每棵树上收集一个10厘米的圆盘,用于纤维素和纸张的密度测定和解剖研究。与圆纹E.tereticornis相比,pellita的树高、1.30m高处的树干直径(DBH)和每棵树的体积都更高。与pellita相比,tereticornis的每公顷体积和平均年增量更高。根据纤维尺寸计算的质量指标,我们没有观察到两个物种之间的柔韧性系数有任何变化;然而,这一指数的异质性更强,在圆脊灰蝶髓中的值最低。pellita桉树表现出较低的壁分数值,包括髓中较低的总值。Runkel指数在E.pellita中最低;此外,在圆翅蠊的髓部位置发现最高值,在1以上。长细比指数在不同物种之间没有差异,也不可能检测出哪种表现更好。结果表明,E.pellita和E.tereticornis在生产具有高机械阻力的纸张(如书写、印刷和包装)方面具有潜力。这两种木材都有潜力用于生产纸张和纤维素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WOOD EVALUATION OF Eucalyptus pellita F.Muell. AND Eucalyptus tereticornis Smith AS POTENTIAL FOR PULP AND PAPER PRODUCTION
This paper aimed to determine the quality indexes for paper and cellulose based on the fiber features from two wood species of interest, Eucalyptus pellita and E. tereticornis. The mean annual increment (IMA) was calculated by measuring DBH and Height (25 years), a 10 cm disk from each tree was collected for density determinations and anatomical studies for cellulose and paper. Tree height, trunk diameter at 1.30 m in height (DBH), and volume per tree were higher in E. pellita when compared to E. tereticornis. The volume per hectare and average annual increment were higher in E. tereticornis compared to E. pellita. Based on the quality indexes calculated from fiber dimensions, we did not observe any variation in flexibility coefficient between the two species; however, this index was more heterogeneous with the lowest value in E. tereticornis pith. Eucalyptus pellita showed a lower wall fraction value, including a lower overall value in pith. The Runkel index was lowest in E. pellita; in addition, the highest value, above 1, was found in pith position in E. tereticornis. The slenderness index did not differ between species and it was not possible to detect which had performed better. The results indicate that E. pellita and E. tereticornis have potential for the production of paper with high mechanical resistance, such as writing, printing and packaging. The wood of both species has potential for use in producing paper and cellulose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GERMINATION AND SURVIVAL OF Nidularium innocentii Lem. (BROMELIACEAE), ORNAMENTAL BROMELIAD ON LOW-COST SUBSTRATES FOR CULTIVATION: AN ALTERNATIVE TO EXTRATIVISM FATORES EDÁFICOS E HÍDRICOS LIGADOS À GERMINAÇÃO E AO DESENVOLVIMENTO INICIAL DA ESPÉCIE SUPERDOMINANTE Sesbania virgata (CAV.) PERS PERCEPÇÃO SOBRE ESPÉCIES EXÓTICAS E NATIVAS NA ARBORIZAÇÃO DE ESCOLAS NA CIDADE DE MOSSORÓ, RN, BRASIL ANÁLISE QUALI-QUANTITATIVA DA ARBORIZAÇÃO VIÁRIA DE DOIS BAIRROS DO MUNICÍPIO DE BAURU, SÃO PAULO SATURAÇÃO POR BASES E DOSES DE FÓSFORO NO CRESCIMENTO INICIAL DE MUDAS DE Buchenavia tomentosa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1