成绩预期:过去的表现能在多大程度上预测未来的成绩?

IF 1.2 Q3 Social Sciences Education Economics Pub Date : 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1080/09645292.2022.2113861
G. Wyness, L. Macmillan, Jake Anders, Catherine Dilnot
{"title":"成绩预期:过去的表现能在多大程度上预测未来的成绩?","authors":"G. Wyness, L. Macmillan, Jake Anders, Catherine Dilnot","doi":"10.1080/09645292.2022.2113861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Students in the UK apply to university with teacher-predicted examination grades, rather than actual results. These predictions have been shown to be inaccurate, and to favour certain groups, leading to concerns about teacher bias. We ask whether it is possible to improve on the accuracy of teachers’ predictions by predicting pupil achievement using prior attainment data and machine learning techniques. While our models do lead to a quantitative improvement on teacher predictions, substantial inaccuracies remain. Our models also underpredict high-achieving state school pupils and low socio-economic status pupils, suggesting they have more volatile education trajectories. This raises questions about the use of predictions in the UK system.","PeriodicalId":46682,"journal":{"name":"Education Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grade expectations: how well can past performance predict future grades?\",\"authors\":\"G. Wyness, L. Macmillan, Jake Anders, Catherine Dilnot\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09645292.2022.2113861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Students in the UK apply to university with teacher-predicted examination grades, rather than actual results. These predictions have been shown to be inaccurate, and to favour certain groups, leading to concerns about teacher bias. We ask whether it is possible to improve on the accuracy of teachers’ predictions by predicting pupil achievement using prior attainment data and machine learning techniques. While our models do lead to a quantitative improvement on teacher predictions, substantial inaccuracies remain. Our models also underpredict high-achieving state school pupils and low socio-economic status pupils, suggesting they have more volatile education trajectories. This raises questions about the use of predictions in the UK system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2113861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2113861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国学生申请大学的依据是老师预测的考试成绩,而不是实际成绩。这些预测已被证明是不准确的,而且有利于某些群体,这导致了对教师偏见的担忧。我们想知道是否有可能通过使用先前的成就数据和机器学习技术来预测学生的成就,从而提高教师预测的准确性。虽然我们的模型确实导致了教师预测的定量改进,但仍然存在大量的不准确性。我们的模型还低估了成绩优异的公立学校学生和社会经济地位较低的学生,这表明他们的教育轨迹更不稳定。这引发了人们对英国系统中预测使用的质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grade expectations: how well can past performance predict future grades?
ABSTRACT Students in the UK apply to university with teacher-predicted examination grades, rather than actual results. These predictions have been shown to be inaccurate, and to favour certain groups, leading to concerns about teacher bias. We ask whether it is possible to improve on the accuracy of teachers’ predictions by predicting pupil achievement using prior attainment data and machine learning techniques. While our models do lead to a quantitative improvement on teacher predictions, substantial inaccuracies remain. Our models also underpredict high-achieving state school pupils and low socio-economic status pupils, suggesting they have more volatile education trajectories. This raises questions about the use of predictions in the UK system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Economics
Education Economics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Education Economics is a peer-reviewed journal serving as a forum for debate in all areas of the economics and management of education. Particular emphasis is given to the "quantitative" aspects of educational management which involve numerate disciplines such as economics and operational research. The content is of international appeal and is not limited to material of a technical nature. Applied work with clear policy implications is especially encouraged. Readership of the journal includes academics in the field of education, economics and management; civil servants and local government officials responsible for education and manpower planning; educational managers at the level of the individual school or college.
期刊最新文献
The employment effects of the disability education gap in Europe Explaining educational achievement among Indigenous individuals: how important are culture and language? Private tutoring and academic achievement in a selective education system Teachers’ perceptions of students’ school performance: the impact of classroom composition. Evidence from a survey experiment Quantifying the productivity effects of education-job mismatch: a cross-country analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1