{"title":"推导比较的维度","authors":"J. Kuhn, David Nicolas, Brian Buccola","doi":"10.7358/snip-2022-043-knbu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In English, using the comparative more with a mass noun (more co ee) allows comparison along various dimensions, including volume and weight, while using more with a plural (more cats) typically only allows comparison by cardinality. Wellwood (2019) proposes to capture these facts via a constraint on the measure function μ expressed by the comparative when it is combined with a nominal expression whose denotation P has a parthood relation ≤. Wellwood’s constraint is that μ must satisfy ‘automorphism invariance’:","PeriodicalId":51966,"journal":{"name":"Snippets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deriving dimensions of comparison\",\"authors\":\"J. Kuhn, David Nicolas, Brian Buccola\",\"doi\":\"10.7358/snip-2022-043-knbu\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In English, using the comparative more with a mass noun (more co ee) allows comparison along various dimensions, including volume and weight, while using more with a plural (more cats) typically only allows comparison by cardinality. Wellwood (2019) proposes to capture these facts via a constraint on the measure function μ expressed by the comparative when it is combined with a nominal expression whose denotation P has a parthood relation ≤. Wellwood’s constraint is that μ must satisfy ‘automorphism invariance’:\",\"PeriodicalId\":51966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Snippets\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Snippets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7358/snip-2022-043-knbu\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Snippets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/snip-2022-043-knbu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在英语中,将比较级more与质量名词(more co ee)连用,可以在不同的维度上进行比较,包括体积和重量,而将more与复数(more cats)连用,通常只能通过基数进行比较。Wellwood(2019)提出,当比较词与外延P具有部分关系≤的名义表达式相结合时,通过对测量函数μ的约束来捕捉这些事实。Wellwood的约束是μ必须满足“自同构不变性”:
In English, using the comparative more with a mass noun (more co ee) allows comparison along various dimensions, including volume and weight, while using more with a plural (more cats) typically only allows comparison by cardinality. Wellwood (2019) proposes to capture these facts via a constraint on the measure function μ expressed by the comparative when it is combined with a nominal expression whose denotation P has a parthood relation ≤. Wellwood’s constraint is that μ must satisfy ‘automorphism invariance’: