有效机械设计特征重用的预测概率模型评估

IF 1.7 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Ai Edam-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing Pub Date : 2022-05-06 DOI:10.1017/S0890060422000014
G. Vasantha, David Purves, J. Quigley, J. Corney, A. Sherlock, Geevin Randika
{"title":"有效机械设计特征重用的预测概率模型评估","authors":"G. Vasantha, David Purves, J. Quigley, J. Corney, A. Sherlock, Geevin Randika","doi":"10.1017/S0890060422000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This research envisages an automated system to inform engineers when opportunities occur to use existing features or configurations during the development of new products. Such a system could be termed a \"predictive CAD system\" because it would be able to suggest feature choices that follow patterns established in existing products. The predictive CAD literature largely focuses on predicting components for assemblies using 3D solid models. In contrast, this research work focuses on feature-based predictive CAD system using B-rep models. This paper investigates the performance of predictive models that could enable the creation of such an intelligent CAD system by assessing three different methods to support inference: sequential, machine learning, or probabilistic methods using N-Grams, Neural Networks (NNs), and Bayesian Networks (BNs) as representative of these methods. After defining the functional properties that characterize a predictive design system, a generic development methodology is presented. The methodology is used to carry out a systematic assessment of the relative performance of three methods each used to predict the diameter value of the next hole and boss feature type being added during the design of a hydraulic valve body. Evaluating predictive performance providing five recommendations ($k = 5$) for hole or boss features as a new design was developed, recall@k increased from around 30% to 50% and precision@k from around 50% to 70% as one to three features were added. The results indicate that the BN and NN models perform better than those using N-Grams. The practical impact of this contribution is assessed using a prototype (implemented as an extension to a commercial CAD system) by engineers whose comments defined an agenda for ongoing research in this area.","PeriodicalId":50951,"journal":{"name":"Ai Edam-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of predictive probability models for effective mechanical design feature reuse\",\"authors\":\"G. Vasantha, David Purves, J. Quigley, J. Corney, A. Sherlock, Geevin Randika\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0890060422000014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This research envisages an automated system to inform engineers when opportunities occur to use existing features or configurations during the development of new products. Such a system could be termed a \\\"predictive CAD system\\\" because it would be able to suggest feature choices that follow patterns established in existing products. The predictive CAD literature largely focuses on predicting components for assemblies using 3D solid models. In contrast, this research work focuses on feature-based predictive CAD system using B-rep models. This paper investigates the performance of predictive models that could enable the creation of such an intelligent CAD system by assessing three different methods to support inference: sequential, machine learning, or probabilistic methods using N-Grams, Neural Networks (NNs), and Bayesian Networks (BNs) as representative of these methods. After defining the functional properties that characterize a predictive design system, a generic development methodology is presented. The methodology is used to carry out a systematic assessment of the relative performance of three methods each used to predict the diameter value of the next hole and boss feature type being added during the design of a hydraulic valve body. Evaluating predictive performance providing five recommendations ($k = 5$) for hole or boss features as a new design was developed, recall@k increased from around 30% to 50% and precision@k from around 50% to 70% as one to three features were added. The results indicate that the BN and NN models perform better than those using N-Grams. The practical impact of this contribution is assessed using a prototype (implemented as an extension to a commercial CAD system) by engineers whose comments defined an agenda for ongoing research in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ai Edam-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ai Edam-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060422000014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ai Edam-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060422000014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要这项研究设想了一个自动化系统,当在新产品开发过程中出现使用现有功能或配置的机会时,该系统会通知工程师。这样的系统可以被称为“预测CAD系统”,因为它能够根据现有产品中建立的模式提出特征选择。预测CAD文献主要关注使用三维实体模型预测部件。相比之下,本研究工作的重点是使用B-rep模型的基于特征的预测CAD系统。本文通过评估三种不同的方法来支持推理,研究了可以创建这样一个智能CAD系统的预测模型的性能:使用N-Grams、神经网络(NNs)和贝叶斯网络(BNs)作为这些方法的代表的顺序、机器学习或概率方法。在定义了预测设计系统的功能特性后,提出了一种通用的开发方法。该方法用于对三种方法的相对性能进行系统评估,每种方法用于预测液压阀体设计过程中添加的下一个孔和凸台特征类型的直径值。随着新设计的开发,评估预测性能,为孔或凸台特征提供五个建议($k=5$),recall@k从30%左右增加到50%precision@k从大约50%到70%,因为添加了一到三个特征。结果表明,BN和NN模型的性能优于使用N-Grams的模型。工程师们使用原型(作为商业CAD系统的扩展)评估了这一贡献的实际影响,他们的意见确定了该领域正在进行的研究的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of predictive probability models for effective mechanical design feature reuse
Abstract This research envisages an automated system to inform engineers when opportunities occur to use existing features or configurations during the development of new products. Such a system could be termed a "predictive CAD system" because it would be able to suggest feature choices that follow patterns established in existing products. The predictive CAD literature largely focuses on predicting components for assemblies using 3D solid models. In contrast, this research work focuses on feature-based predictive CAD system using B-rep models. This paper investigates the performance of predictive models that could enable the creation of such an intelligent CAD system by assessing three different methods to support inference: sequential, machine learning, or probabilistic methods using N-Grams, Neural Networks (NNs), and Bayesian Networks (BNs) as representative of these methods. After defining the functional properties that characterize a predictive design system, a generic development methodology is presented. The methodology is used to carry out a systematic assessment of the relative performance of three methods each used to predict the diameter value of the next hole and boss feature type being added during the design of a hydraulic valve body. Evaluating predictive performance providing five recommendations ($k = 5$) for hole or boss features as a new design was developed, recall@k increased from around 30% to 50% and precision@k from around 50% to 70% as one to three features were added. The results indicate that the BN and NN models perform better than those using N-Grams. The practical impact of this contribution is assessed using a prototype (implemented as an extension to a commercial CAD system) by engineers whose comments defined an agenda for ongoing research in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original articles about significant AI theory and applications based on the most up-to-date research in all branches and phases of engineering. Suitable topics include: analysis and evaluation; selection; configuration and design; manufacturing and assembly; and concurrent engineering. Specifically, the journal is interested in the use of AI in planning, design, analysis, simulation, qualitative reasoning, spatial reasoning and graphics, manufacturing, assembly, process planning, scheduling, numerical analysis, optimization, distributed systems, multi-agent applications, cooperation, cognitive modeling, learning and creativity. AI EDAM is also interested in original, major applications of state-of-the-art knowledge-based techniques to important engineering problems.
期刊最新文献
Does empathy lead to creativity? A simulation-based investigation on the role of team trait empathy on nominal group concept generation and early concept screening A knowledge-enabled approach for user experience-driven product improvement at the conceptual design stage Free-text inspiration search for systematic bio-inspiration support of engineering design Tool life prediction via SMB-enabled monitor based on BPNN coupling algorithms for sustainable manufacturing A comparative review on the role of stimuli in idea generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1