威廉姆斯的深刻性:语用自然主义与分布式诗学思维

James Searle
{"title":"威廉姆斯的深刻性:语用自然主义与分布式诗学思维","authors":"James Searle","doi":"10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay reads Williams’s poetry and poetics from the vantage of pragmatic naturalism to clarify the philosophical and pedagogical importance of Kora in Hell: Improvisations. Drawing on the work of John Dewey and contemporary philosophy of mind, it both reconsiders the status of things and objects in Williams’s compositional practice and clarifies the poet’s radical claims for the enabling role of poetry and the arts for human agency and thinking.","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":"39 1","pages":"160 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Williams’s Profundity: Pragmatic Naturalism and Distributed Poetic Thinking\",\"authors\":\"James Searle\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This essay reads Williams’s poetry and poetics from the vantage of pragmatic naturalism to clarify the philosophical and pedagogical importance of Kora in Hell: Improvisations. Drawing on the work of John Dewey and contemporary philosophy of mind, it both reconsiders the status of things and objects in Williams’s compositional practice and clarifies the poet’s radical claims for the enabling role of poetry and the arts for human agency and thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"160 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"POETRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/willcarlwillrevi.39.2.0160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文从语用自然主义的角度解读威廉姆斯的诗歌和诗学,以阐明《地狱里的可拉:即兴创作》在哲学和教学上的重要性。它借鉴了约翰·杜威的作品和当代心灵哲学,重新思考了事物在威廉姆斯创作实践中的地位,并阐明了诗人对诗歌和艺术对人类能动性和思维的促进作用的激进主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Williams’s Profundity: Pragmatic Naturalism and Distributed Poetic Thinking
ABSTRACT:This essay reads Williams’s poetry and poetics from the vantage of pragmatic naturalism to clarify the philosophical and pedagogical importance of Kora in Hell: Improvisations. Drawing on the work of John Dewey and contemporary philosophy of mind, it both reconsiders the status of things and objects in Williams’s compositional practice and clarifies the poet’s radical claims for the enabling role of poetry and the arts for human agency and thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Invisible Labor in William Carlos Williams A New Language for a New Perception: A Study of the Influence of Chinese Poetry on the Composition of Spring and All William Carlos Williams and Emily Dickinson Wellcome: The Conflict of the Doctor Persona and the Christian Science Anima William Carlos Williams Bibliography 2022 William Carlos Williams and the Subject of Aging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1