英国成年终末期肾病患者家庭血液透析治疗选择的决策过程:系统文献综述

M. Ekpenyong, Stephen Alfred, Bosu-Arije Foluke, Oley Jallow, C. Manju, Nyashanu Mathew
{"title":"英国成年终末期肾病患者家庭血液透析治疗选择的决策过程:系统文献综述","authors":"M. Ekpenyong, Stephen Alfred, Bosu-Arije Foluke, Oley Jallow, C. Manju, Nyashanu Mathew","doi":"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_69_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In the UK, the number of people diagnosed with renal disease is on the increase. As a result, there will be more people in need of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Despite the mounting evidence showing that home hemodialysis (HHD) treatment is clinical and cost-effective as well as amendable to suit patients' lifestyle, the number of patients choosing this dialysis modality is low. The aim of this study is to explore factors influencing decision-making process in the selection of HHD treatment for adult patients with end-stage renal disease in the UK. Methods: A systematic literature review methodology was utilized to review, critique, and synthesize the literature on the low uptake of HHD among adult patients. Systematic searches involving the databases Google Scholar, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were carried out for articles published from 2008 to 2021. A search was conducted from June 1 through December 23, 2020. Eight articles met the study inclusion criteria. We followed preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in designing the research and reporting. Results: This systematic review revealed that patient information needs, dialysis education, training and support, and patient decision-making preference were the major factors influencing decision-making of adult patients. Conclusion: Deciding over which dialysis modality to choose can be challenging for many adult patients. Dialysis education, training, and support should not stop at the predialysis stage but should continue during treatment.","PeriodicalId":10321,"journal":{"name":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"209 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making process in the selection of home hemodialysis treatment by adult patients with end-stage renal disease in the United Kingdom: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"M. Ekpenyong, Stephen Alfred, Bosu-Arije Foluke, Oley Jallow, C. Manju, Nyashanu Mathew\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_69_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In the UK, the number of people diagnosed with renal disease is on the increase. As a result, there will be more people in need of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Despite the mounting evidence showing that home hemodialysis (HHD) treatment is clinical and cost-effective as well as amendable to suit patients' lifestyle, the number of patients choosing this dialysis modality is low. The aim of this study is to explore factors influencing decision-making process in the selection of HHD treatment for adult patients with end-stage renal disease in the UK. Methods: A systematic literature review methodology was utilized to review, critique, and synthesize the literature on the low uptake of HHD among adult patients. Systematic searches involving the databases Google Scholar, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were carried out for articles published from 2008 to 2021. A search was conducted from June 1 through December 23, 2020. Eight articles met the study inclusion criteria. We followed preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in designing the research and reporting. Results: This systematic review revealed that patient information needs, dialysis education, training and support, and patient decision-making preference were the major factors influencing decision-making of adult patients. Conclusion: Deciding over which dialysis modality to choose can be challenging for many adult patients. Dialysis education, training, and support should not stop at the predialysis stage but should continue during treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"209 - 218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_69_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_69_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在英国,被诊断患有肾脏疾病的人数正在增加。因此,将有更多的人需要肾脏替代疗法(RRT)。尽管越来越多的证据表明家庭血液透析(HHD)治疗具有临床意义和成本效益,并且可以适应患者的生活方式,但选择这种透析方式的患者数量很少。本研究的目的是探讨影响英国成年终末期肾病患者HHD治疗选择决策过程的因素。方法:采用系统的文献回顾方法,对成人HHD低摄取的文献进行回顾、批判和综合。系统检索数据库谷歌Scholar、EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和CINAHL,检索2008年至2021年发表的文章。从2020年6月1日到12月23日进行了搜索。8篇文章符合研究纳入标准。在设计研究和报告时,我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目。结果:本系统综述显示,患者信息需求、透析教育、培训和支持、患者决策偏好是影响成人患者决策的主要因素。结论:决定选择哪种透析方式对许多成人患者来说是具有挑战性的。透析教育、培训和支持不应在透析前阶段停止,而应在治疗期间继续进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision-making process in the selection of home hemodialysis treatment by adult patients with end-stage renal disease in the United Kingdom: A systematic literature review
Introduction: In the UK, the number of people diagnosed with renal disease is on the increase. As a result, there will be more people in need of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Despite the mounting evidence showing that home hemodialysis (HHD) treatment is clinical and cost-effective as well as amendable to suit patients' lifestyle, the number of patients choosing this dialysis modality is low. The aim of this study is to explore factors influencing decision-making process in the selection of HHD treatment for adult patients with end-stage renal disease in the UK. Methods: A systematic literature review methodology was utilized to review, critique, and synthesize the literature on the low uptake of HHD among adult patients. Systematic searches involving the databases Google Scholar, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were carried out for articles published from 2008 to 2021. A search was conducted from June 1 through December 23, 2020. Eight articles met the study inclusion criteria. We followed preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in designing the research and reporting. Results: This systematic review revealed that patient information needs, dialysis education, training and support, and patient decision-making preference were the major factors influencing decision-making of adult patients. Conclusion: Deciding over which dialysis modality to choose can be challenging for many adult patients. Dialysis education, training, and support should not stop at the predialysis stage but should continue during treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Standardization of objective structured practical examination in terms of validity and reliability in biochemistry: Our first experience Occupational stress: An impediment to quality nurse–Patient relationship – A rapid review COVID-19 positivity in the COVID suspect and green zones of a large emergency department during the first wave of the pandemic in South India Healthcare-seeking behavior and awareness regarding snakebites and its first-aid management among tribal women in rural Maharashtra Hippocratic oath in dentistry: An insight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1