在印度尼西亚和瑞典对欧共体的关爱和男子气概的矛盾心理进行研究;通过人种学方法论挑战主流规范

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ethnography and Education Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17457823.2021.1919168
A. Hellman
{"title":"在印度尼西亚和瑞典对欧共体的关爱和男子气概的矛盾心理进行研究;通过人种学方法论挑战主流规范","authors":"A. Hellman","doi":"10.1080/17457823.2021.1919168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of the article is to explore norms about care and masculinity in early childhood education and care settings in Indonesia and Sweden. Building on long-term ethnographic fieldwork, it is shown how care in the two nations was produced as ambivalent for men, causing a risk of being accused of working with children for the wrong reasons. Two different strategies were employed by the men to handle this: to avoid caring practices and to renegotiate care, making it part of hegemonic masculinity. In the study, ethnographic methodology building on long-term relations, situated knowledge and trust, was key to gain the two different perspectives. The methodology produced nuanced understandings of how care and masculinity came to be enacted in different social and religious contexts. The extended field work enabled trustful relations to develop, which in turn facilitated shared learning about gendered bodies, fear and shame in relation to care","PeriodicalId":46203,"journal":{"name":"Ethnography and Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"343 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17457823.2021.1919168","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doing research in Indonesia and Sweden on the ambivalence of care and masculinity in ECEC; challenging dominant norms through ethnographic methodology\",\"authors\":\"A. Hellman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17457823.2021.1919168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The aim of the article is to explore norms about care and masculinity in early childhood education and care settings in Indonesia and Sweden. Building on long-term ethnographic fieldwork, it is shown how care in the two nations was produced as ambivalent for men, causing a risk of being accused of working with children for the wrong reasons. Two different strategies were employed by the men to handle this: to avoid caring practices and to renegotiate care, making it part of hegemonic masculinity. In the study, ethnographic methodology building on long-term relations, situated knowledge and trust, was key to gain the two different perspectives. The methodology produced nuanced understandings of how care and masculinity came to be enacted in different social and religious contexts. The extended field work enabled trustful relations to develop, which in turn facilitated shared learning about gendered bodies, fear and shame in relation to care\",\"PeriodicalId\":46203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnography and Education\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"343 - 357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17457823.2021.1919168\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnography and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1919168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnography and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.1919168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是探讨在印度尼西亚和瑞典的幼儿教育和护理环境中关于照顾和男性气质的规范。在长期的人种学田野调查的基础上,它显示了两个国家对男性的照顾是如何产生矛盾的,这导致了被指控出于错误的原因照顾孩子的风险。男人们采用了两种不同的策略来处理这个问题:避免护理行为,重新协商护理,使其成为男性霸权的一部分。在这项研究中,建立在长期关系、情境知识和信任基础上的民族志方法论是获得两种不同观点的关键。这种方法对不同社会和宗教背景下的关怀和男子气概产生了微妙的理解。扩展的实地工作促进了信任关系的发展,这反过来又促进了对与护理有关的性别身体、恐惧和羞耻的共同学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Doing research in Indonesia and Sweden on the ambivalence of care and masculinity in ECEC; challenging dominant norms through ethnographic methodology
ABSTRACT The aim of the article is to explore norms about care and masculinity in early childhood education and care settings in Indonesia and Sweden. Building on long-term ethnographic fieldwork, it is shown how care in the two nations was produced as ambivalent for men, causing a risk of being accused of working with children for the wrong reasons. Two different strategies were employed by the men to handle this: to avoid caring practices and to renegotiate care, making it part of hegemonic masculinity. In the study, ethnographic methodology building on long-term relations, situated knowledge and trust, was key to gain the two different perspectives. The methodology produced nuanced understandings of how care and masculinity came to be enacted in different social and religious contexts. The extended field work enabled trustful relations to develop, which in turn facilitated shared learning about gendered bodies, fear and shame in relation to care
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnography and Education
Ethnography and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Ethnography and Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing articles that illuminate educational practices through empirical methodologies, which prioritise the experiences and perspectives of those involved. The journal is open to a wide range of ethnographic research that emanates from the perspectives of sociology, linguistics, history, psychology and general educational studies as well as anthropology. The journal’s priority is to support ethnographic research that involves long-term engagement with those studied in order to understand their cultures, uses multiple methods of generating data, and recognises the centrality of the researcher in the research process. The journal welcomes substantive and methodological articles that seek to explicate and challenge the effects of educational policies and practices; interrogate and develop theories about educational structures, policies and experiences; highlight the agency of educational actors; and provide accounts of how the everyday practices of those engaged in education are instrumental in social reproduction.
期刊最新文献
Ethical dilemmas of translanguaging pedagogy in L2 and basic literacy education for adults: social justice and ethics of care Playing the ‘pibe chorro’ game: masculine skills and legitimate peripheral participation in street culture ‘What’s he writing in there?’ Reciprocal field relations and relational curiosity in ethnographies of education Student voices in creative teaching practices with digital media: a meta-ethnographic research Is there room for interculturality? Indigenous youth in Peruvian private universities and the scholarship programme Beca 18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1