通过机器学习设计个人学习计划的智能方法

Shiyuan Zhang, Evan Gunnell, Marisabel Chang, Yu Sun
{"title":"通过机器学习设计个人学习计划的智能方法","authors":"Shiyuan Zhang, Evan Gunnell, Marisabel Chang, Yu Sun","doi":"10.5121/csit.2020.101804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As more students are required to have standardized test scores to enter higher education, developing vocabulary becomes essential for achieving ideal scores. Each individual has his or her own study style that maximizes the efficiency, and there are various approaches to memorize. However, it is difficult to find a specific learning method that fits the best to a person. This paper designs a tool to customize personal study plans based on clients’ different habits including difficulty distribution, difficulty order of learning words, and the types of vocabulary. We applied our application to educational software and conducted a quantitative evaluation of the approach via three types of machine learning models. By calculating cross-validation scores, we evaluated the accuracy of each model and discovered the best model that returns the most accurate predictions. The results reveal that linear regression has the highest cross validation score, and it can provide the most efficient personal study plans.","PeriodicalId":72673,"journal":{"name":"Computer science & information technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Intellectual Approach to Design Personal Study Plan via Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Shiyuan Zhang, Evan Gunnell, Marisabel Chang, Yu Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.5121/csit.2020.101804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As more students are required to have standardized test scores to enter higher education, developing vocabulary becomes essential for achieving ideal scores. Each individual has his or her own study style that maximizes the efficiency, and there are various approaches to memorize. However, it is difficult to find a specific learning method that fits the best to a person. This paper designs a tool to customize personal study plans based on clients’ different habits including difficulty distribution, difficulty order of learning words, and the types of vocabulary. We applied our application to educational software and conducted a quantitative evaluation of the approach via three types of machine learning models. By calculating cross-validation scores, we evaluated the accuracy of each model and discovered the best model that returns the most accurate predictions. The results reveal that linear regression has the highest cross validation score, and it can provide the most efficient personal study plans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer science & information technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer science & information technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2020.101804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer science & information technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2020.101804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着越来越多的学生被要求有标准化的考试成绩才能进入高等教育,提高词汇量对于获得理想的成绩至关重要。每个人都有他或她自己的学习方式,以最大限度地提高效率,有各种各样的方法来记忆。然而,很难找到一种最适合个人的具体学习方法。本文设计了一个工具,根据客户不同的学习习惯,包括学习单词的难度分布、难度顺序和词汇类型,定制个性化的学习计划。我们将我们的应用程序应用于教育软件,并通过三种类型的机器学习模型对该方法进行了定量评估。通过计算交叉验证分数,我们评估了每个模型的准确性,并发现了返回最准确预测的最佳模型。结果表明,线性回归具有最高的交叉验证分数,它可以提供最有效的个人学习计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Intellectual Approach to Design Personal Study Plan via Machine Learning
As more students are required to have standardized test scores to enter higher education, developing vocabulary becomes essential for achieving ideal scores. Each individual has his or her own study style that maximizes the efficiency, and there are various approaches to memorize. However, it is difficult to find a specific learning method that fits the best to a person. This paper designs a tool to customize personal study plans based on clients’ different habits including difficulty distribution, difficulty order of learning words, and the types of vocabulary. We applied our application to educational software and conducted a quantitative evaluation of the approach via three types of machine learning models. By calculating cross-validation scores, we evaluated the accuracy of each model and discovered the best model that returns the most accurate predictions. The results reveal that linear regression has the highest cross validation score, and it can provide the most efficient personal study plans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tensor-Based Multi-Modality Feature Selection and Regression for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis. Tensor-Based Multi-Modality Feature Selection and Regression for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis Lattice Based Group Key Exchange Protocol in the Standard Model The 5 Dimensions of Problem Solving using DINNA Diagram: Double Ishikawa and Naze Naze Analysis Appraisal Study of Similarity-Based and Embedding-Based Link Prediction Methods on Graphs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1