{"title":"双相抑郁症与单极抑郁症相比有更多的非典型抑郁症状","authors":"Cai-Lan Hou , Sheng-Jun Zhang , Xie Chen , Zhuo-Hui Huang , Cheng-Jia Yang , Fu-Jun Jia , Ming-Zhi Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.npbr.2020.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depressive patients with atypical symptoms tend to cause greater functional impairment. This study examined the differences of the atypical depressive symptoms between unipolar and bipolar depressive patients (BP I and BP II).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We studied 466 depressed patients (262 unipolar and 204 bipolar subjects, in which 122 BP I depression, 82 BP II depression) diagnosed with DSM-IV criteria. Atypical depressive symptoms were also evaluated with DSM-IV criteria for atypical features specifier. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the associations of atypical depressive symptoms with depressive disorders after control of confounding variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence with any atypical depressive symptoms in unipolar depressive disorder was 32.8 % (86/262), and in bipolar depression was 44.6 % (91/204), X<sup>2</sup> = 6.76, P = 0.009. In stepwise binary logistic regression analysis, patients with bipolar depression had more females, more positive psychiatric history, more weight gain or increase in appetite, more interpersonal rejection sensitivity, and more visual values of severest pain.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The participants recruited were both inpatients and outpatients in one major hospital which might influence the generality of the study. The cross-sectional research methods can't work out causality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Bipolar depression and major depressive disorder exhibit subtle differences in presentation, which may help guide the early intervention, initial diagnosis and the choice of therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49756,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","volume":"37 ","pages":"Pages 104-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2020.05.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bipolar depression had more atypical depressive symptoms in comparison with unipolar depression\",\"authors\":\"Cai-Lan Hou , Sheng-Jun Zhang , Xie Chen , Zhuo-Hui Huang , Cheng-Jia Yang , Fu-Jun Jia , Ming-Zhi Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.npbr.2020.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Depressive patients with atypical symptoms tend to cause greater functional impairment. This study examined the differences of the atypical depressive symptoms between unipolar and bipolar depressive patients (BP I and BP II).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We studied 466 depressed patients (262 unipolar and 204 bipolar subjects, in which 122 BP I depression, 82 BP II depression) diagnosed with DSM-IV criteria. Atypical depressive symptoms were also evaluated with DSM-IV criteria for atypical features specifier. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the associations of atypical depressive symptoms with depressive disorders after control of confounding variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence with any atypical depressive symptoms in unipolar depressive disorder was 32.8 % (86/262), and in bipolar depression was 44.6 % (91/204), X<sup>2</sup> = 6.76, P = 0.009. In stepwise binary logistic regression analysis, patients with bipolar depression had more females, more positive psychiatric history, more weight gain or increase in appetite, more interpersonal rejection sensitivity, and more visual values of severest pain.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The participants recruited were both inpatients and outpatients in one major hospital which might influence the generality of the study. The cross-sectional research methods can't work out causality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Bipolar depression and major depressive disorder exhibit subtle differences in presentation, which may help guide the early intervention, initial diagnosis and the choice of therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 104-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.npbr.2020.05.006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950020300178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0941950020300178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:具有非典型症状的抑郁症患者往往会导致更大的功能损害。方法对466例抑郁症患者(262例单极抑郁症患者,204例双相抑郁症患者,其中122例为BP I型抑郁症患者,82例为BP II型抑郁症患者)按照DSM-IV标准进行诊断。非典型抑郁症状也用DSM-IV的非典型特征说明标准进行评估。在控制混杂变量后,采用二元逻辑回归来检验非典型抑郁症状与抑郁症的关联。结果单相抑郁障碍伴非典型抑郁症状的发生率为32.8%(86/262),双相抑郁伴非典型抑郁症状的发生率为44.6% (91/204),X2 = 6.76, P = 0.009。逐步二元logistic回归分析发现,双相抑郁症患者女性较多,阳性精神病史较多,体重增加或食欲增加较多,人际排斥敏感性较高,最严重疼痛视觉值较高。所招募的参与者是一家大医院的住院病人和门诊病人,这可能会影响研究的普遍性。横断面研究方法不能得出因果关系。结论双相抑郁与重性抑郁在表现上存在细微差异,有助于指导早期干预、初步诊断和治疗方案的选择。
Bipolar depression had more atypical depressive symptoms in comparison with unipolar depression
Background
Depressive patients with atypical symptoms tend to cause greater functional impairment. This study examined the differences of the atypical depressive symptoms between unipolar and bipolar depressive patients (BP I and BP II).
Methods
We studied 466 depressed patients (262 unipolar and 204 bipolar subjects, in which 122 BP I depression, 82 BP II depression) diagnosed with DSM-IV criteria. Atypical depressive symptoms were also evaluated with DSM-IV criteria for atypical features specifier. Binary logistic regression was used to examine the associations of atypical depressive symptoms with depressive disorders after control of confounding variables.
Results
The prevalence with any atypical depressive symptoms in unipolar depressive disorder was 32.8 % (86/262), and in bipolar depression was 44.6 % (91/204), X2 = 6.76, P = 0.009. In stepwise binary logistic regression analysis, patients with bipolar depression had more females, more positive psychiatric history, more weight gain or increase in appetite, more interpersonal rejection sensitivity, and more visual values of severest pain.
Limitations
The participants recruited were both inpatients and outpatients in one major hospital which might influence the generality of the study. The cross-sectional research methods can't work out causality.
Conclusions
Bipolar depression and major depressive disorder exhibit subtle differences in presentation, which may help guide the early intervention, initial diagnosis and the choice of therapy.
期刊介绍:
Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research publishes original papers and reviews in
biological psychiatry,
brain research,
neurology,
neuropsychiatry,
neuropsychoimmunology,
psychopathology,
psychotherapy.
The journal has a focus on international and interdisciplinary basic research with clinical relevance. Translational research is particularly appreciated. Authors are allowed to submit their manuscript in their native language as supplemental data to the English version.
Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research is related to the oldest German speaking journal in this field, the Centralblatt fur Nervenheilkunde, Psychiatrie und gerichtliche Psychopathologie, founded in 1878. The tradition and idea of previous famous editors (Alois Alzheimer and Kurt Schneider among others) was continued in modernized form with Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research. Centralblatt was a journal of broad scope and relevance, now Neurology, Psychiatry & Brain Research represents a journal with translational and interdisciplinary perspective, focusing on clinically oriented research in psychiatry, neurology and neighboring fields of neurosciences and psychology/psychotherapy with a preference for biologically oriented research including basic research. Preference is given for papers from newly emerging fields, like clinical psychoimmunology/neuroimmunology, and ideas.