孤独与纵向和横向集体主义和个人主义:一项跨国研究

Julie Aitken Schermer , Marija Branković , Đorđe Čekrlija , Kristi Baerg MacDonald , Joonha Park , Eva Papazova , Tatiana Volkodav , Dzintra Iliško , Anna Wlodarczyk , Maria Magdalena Kwiatkowska , Radosław Rogoza , Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios , Truong Thi Khanh Ha , Christopher Marcin Kowalski , Sadia Malik , Samuel Lins , Ginés Navarro-Carrillo , Sibele D. Aquino , Marta Doroszuk , Ognjen Riđić , Gert Kruger
{"title":"孤独与纵向和横向集体主义和个人主义:一项跨国研究","authors":"Julie Aitken Schermer ,&nbsp;Marija Branković ,&nbsp;Đorđe Čekrlija ,&nbsp;Kristi Baerg MacDonald ,&nbsp;Joonha Park ,&nbsp;Eva Papazova ,&nbsp;Tatiana Volkodav ,&nbsp;Dzintra Iliško ,&nbsp;Anna Wlodarczyk ,&nbsp;Maria Magdalena Kwiatkowska ,&nbsp;Radosław Rogoza ,&nbsp;Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios ,&nbsp;Truong Thi Khanh Ha ,&nbsp;Christopher Marcin Kowalski ,&nbsp;Sadia Malik ,&nbsp;Samuel Lins ,&nbsp;Ginés Navarro-Carrillo ,&nbsp;Sibele D. Aquino ,&nbsp;Marta Doroszuk ,&nbsp;Ognjen Riđić ,&nbsp;Gert Kruger","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates how horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism predict self-report loneliness in addition to the variance accounted for by age and sex in 28 countries (<em>N</em> = 8,345). Horizontal and vertical aspects of individualism and collectivism had small but significant contributions to predicting loneliness. Horizontal-collectivism (for 19 country samples) and, to a lesser extent, horizontal-individualism (for seven country samples), significantly predicted lower loneliness scores. Vertical-individualism (for 16 country samples), and to a lesser extent, vertical-collectivism (for six country samples), predicted feeling more loneliness among our participants. Adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values suggested that between 0.6% and 27.7% of self-report loneliness was predicted. These results suggest that those who value egalitarian social relations also tend to report being less lonely whereas those who value individuality and competitiveness endorse the loneliness items more. These results are of importance to those investigating and helping lonely individuals by appreciating the influence of perceived culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loneliness and vertical and horizontal collectivism and individualism: A multinational study\",\"authors\":\"Julie Aitken Schermer ,&nbsp;Marija Branković ,&nbsp;Đorđe Čekrlija ,&nbsp;Kristi Baerg MacDonald ,&nbsp;Joonha Park ,&nbsp;Eva Papazova ,&nbsp;Tatiana Volkodav ,&nbsp;Dzintra Iliško ,&nbsp;Anna Wlodarczyk ,&nbsp;Maria Magdalena Kwiatkowska ,&nbsp;Radosław Rogoza ,&nbsp;Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios ,&nbsp;Truong Thi Khanh Ha ,&nbsp;Christopher Marcin Kowalski ,&nbsp;Sadia Malik ,&nbsp;Samuel Lins ,&nbsp;Ginés Navarro-Carrillo ,&nbsp;Sibele D. Aquino ,&nbsp;Marta Doroszuk ,&nbsp;Ognjen Riđić ,&nbsp;Gert Kruger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates how horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism predict self-report loneliness in addition to the variance accounted for by age and sex in 28 countries (<em>N</em> = 8,345). Horizontal and vertical aspects of individualism and collectivism had small but significant contributions to predicting loneliness. Horizontal-collectivism (for 19 country samples) and, to a lesser extent, horizontal-individualism (for seven country samples), significantly predicted lower loneliness scores. Vertical-individualism (for 16 country samples), and to a lesser extent, vertical-collectivism (for six country samples), predicted feeling more loneliness among our participants. Adjusted <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values suggested that between 0.6% and 27.7% of self-report loneliness was predicted. These results suggest that those who value egalitarian social relations also tend to report being less lonely whereas those who value individuality and competitiveness endorse the loneliness items more. These results are of importance to those investigating and helping lonely individuals by appreciating the influence of perceived culture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in behavioral sciences\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in behavioral sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518223000104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518223000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文在28个国家(N = 8345)调查了水平和垂直个人主义和集体主义如何预测自我报告的孤独,以及年龄和性别的差异。个人主义和集体主义的水平和垂直方面对预测孤独的贡献虽小,但却很重要。水平集体主义(19个国家样本)和水平个人主义(7个国家样本)在较小程度上显著预测了较低的孤独得分。纵向个人主义(16个国家样本)和纵向集体主义(6个国家样本)在较小程度上预测了参与者的孤独感。调整后的R2值表明,自我报告的孤独感在0.6%至27.7%之间。这些结果表明,那些重视平等社会关系的人也倾向于报告自己不那么孤独,而那些重视个性和竞争的人则更赞同孤独项目。这些结果对那些通过感知文化的影响来调查和帮助孤独个体的人很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Loneliness and vertical and horizontal collectivism and individualism: A multinational study

This paper investigates how horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism predict self-report loneliness in addition to the variance accounted for by age and sex in 28 countries (N = 8,345). Horizontal and vertical aspects of individualism and collectivism had small but significant contributions to predicting loneliness. Horizontal-collectivism (for 19 country samples) and, to a lesser extent, horizontal-individualism (for seven country samples), significantly predicted lower loneliness scores. Vertical-individualism (for 16 country samples), and to a lesser extent, vertical-collectivism (for six country samples), predicted feeling more loneliness among our participants. Adjusted R2 values suggested that between 0.6% and 27.7% of self-report loneliness was predicted. These results suggest that those who value egalitarian social relations also tend to report being less lonely whereas those who value individuality and competitiveness endorse the loneliness items more. These results are of importance to those investigating and helping lonely individuals by appreciating the influence of perceived culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents The causal role of numerical and non-numerical order processing abilities in the early development of mathematics skills: Evidence from an intervention study Discrete memories of a continuous world: A working memory perspective on event segmentation Relationships between physical activity and loneliness: A systematic review of intervention studies Do narcissists possess a sense of purpose? Purpose-in-life and narcissism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1