关于设计思维、胡扯和创新

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts Pub Date : 2018-12-18 DOI:10.7559/CITARJ.V10I3.555
Rodrigo Hernández-Ramírez
{"title":"关于设计思维、胡扯和创新","authors":"Rodrigo Hernández-Ramírez","doi":"10.7559/CITARJ.V10I3.555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design thinking (DT) has been widely promoted as a powerful approach for systematically achieving innovation, particularly in the world of management. Recently, however, some critical voices from design and science & technology studies have called bullshit on DT, accusing it instead of distorting and trivialising design methods and processes to serve purely commercial goals. Through an analysis of the recent history of design research and an overview of some (philosophical) accounts on the concept of “bullshit”, this paper shows that at least some of the criticism holds. However, it argues that a truly fruitful critique of DT needs to go beyond simple derision. Ultimately, this paper suggests that perhaps we should steer away from the idea that there is a designerly way of thinking, and focus instead on showing how designers, being “doers”, create maker’s knowledge. Designers, educators, managers, and anyone interested in understanding why design goes beyond a simple methodology perhaps might be interested in this account.","PeriodicalId":41151,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Design Thinking, Bullshit, and Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Hernández-Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"10.7559/CITARJ.V10I3.555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design thinking (DT) has been widely promoted as a powerful approach for systematically achieving innovation, particularly in the world of management. Recently, however, some critical voices from design and science & technology studies have called bullshit on DT, accusing it instead of distorting and trivialising design methods and processes to serve purely commercial goals. Through an analysis of the recent history of design research and an overview of some (philosophical) accounts on the concept of “bullshit”, this paper shows that at least some of the criticism holds. However, it argues that a truly fruitful critique of DT needs to go beyond simple derision. Ultimately, this paper suggests that perhaps we should steer away from the idea that there is a designerly way of thinking, and focus instead on showing how designers, being “doers”, create maker’s knowledge. Designers, educators, managers, and anyone interested in understanding why design goes beyond a simple methodology perhaps might be interested in this account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7559/CITARJ.V10I3.555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7559/CITARJ.V10I3.555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

设计思维(DT)作为一种系统地实现创新的有力方法被广泛推广,特别是在管理领域。然而,最近,一些来自设计和科技研究的批评声音称DT是胡说八道,指责它没有扭曲和轻视设计方法和流程,只为纯粹的商业目标服务。通过对近期设计研究历史的分析和对“胡扯”概念的一些(哲学)解释的概述,本文表明至少有一些批评是成立的。然而,它认为,一个真正富有成效的批判DT需要超越简单的嘲笑。最后,本文建议,也许我们应该避开设计师思维方式的想法,而将重点放在展示作为“实干家”的设计师如何创造创造者的知识上。设计师、教育工作者、管理人员以及任何对理解为什么设计不仅仅是一种简单的方法感兴趣的人都可能对这本书感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Design Thinking, Bullshit, and Innovation
Design thinking (DT) has been widely promoted as a powerful approach for systematically achieving innovation, particularly in the world of management. Recently, however, some critical voices from design and science & technology studies have called bullshit on DT, accusing it instead of distorting and trivialising design methods and processes to serve purely commercial goals. Through an analysis of the recent history of design research and an overview of some (philosophical) accounts on the concept of “bullshit”, this paper shows that at least some of the criticism holds. However, it argues that a truly fruitful critique of DT needs to go beyond simple derision. Ultimately, this paper suggests that perhaps we should steer away from the idea that there is a designerly way of thinking, and focus instead on showing how designers, being “doers”, create maker’s knowledge. Designers, educators, managers, and anyone interested in understanding why design goes beyond a simple methodology perhaps might be interested in this account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts
Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts (CITARJ) covers a wide range of topics related to the study and practice of Artistic work approached through Science and Technology, including: -Aesthetics of New Media- Audiovisual and Cinematic Art- Computer Music- Digital Arts - Digital Culture- Generative Art/Systems- Interactive Art - Interactive Multimedia- Interactive Sound- New Interfaces for Digital Expression- New Media Art- Tangible interfaces.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: v13 n2 Moving in Between Resistances: An Axis-Thought on Choreographic Creation in an Educational Context Critical Approaches Towards (A New) Arts Education From Strategic Effects to Tactical Affects The Ambiguous Geometry of Relationships: A Brief Analysis of 'How to Draw a Perfect Circle' after a video essay by Marisa Alves Pedro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1