被调查者年龄对生活环境感知的差异

IF 0.6 Q4 URBAN STUDIES Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge Pub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI:10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2019-30-02-002
Bojan Grum
{"title":"被调查者年龄对生活环境感知的差异","authors":"Bojan Grum","doi":"10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2019-30-02-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores whether potential statistically significant differences in terms of respondents’ demographic characteristics (i.e., age) can point to intergenerational differences in perceptions of the living environment. A quantitative methodology was used. Older respondents reported higher satisfaction, a stronger feeling of socioeconomic homogeneity of the neighbourhood, better neighbourly relations, and more positive opinions on the maintenance of the built environment than did younger respondents. In turn, younger respondents expressed a higher level of agreement about vandalism and physical and verbal attacks in the neighbourhood. These results were unexpected because previous studies showed significantly lower levels of agreement regarding satisfaction with the built environment and significantly higher levels of agreement about crime among older respondents than younger ones. They can be explained by the findings of many researchers, who established that the elderly generally still prefer to grow old at home – that is, in the environment they are familiar with, because they are often afraid that moving to an eldercare facility would inevitably\ncause them to lose their independence. Therefore, they tend to accept the environment where they live the way it is. On the other hand, the article shows that a series\nof statistically significant differences established indicates that the living environment, which has a strong impact on people’s satisfaction and well being, nonetheless does not offer the same quality of the built social infrastructure to all users (i.e., users with different demographic characteristics).","PeriodicalId":54093,"journal":{"name":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in perceptions of the living environment by respondent age\",\"authors\":\"Bojan Grum\",\"doi\":\"10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2019-30-02-002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores whether potential statistically significant differences in terms of respondents’ demographic characteristics (i.e., age) can point to intergenerational differences in perceptions of the living environment. A quantitative methodology was used. Older respondents reported higher satisfaction, a stronger feeling of socioeconomic homogeneity of the neighbourhood, better neighbourly relations, and more positive opinions on the maintenance of the built environment than did younger respondents. In turn, younger respondents expressed a higher level of agreement about vandalism and physical and verbal attacks in the neighbourhood. These results were unexpected because previous studies showed significantly lower levels of agreement regarding satisfaction with the built environment and significantly higher levels of agreement about crime among older respondents than younger ones. They can be explained by the findings of many researchers, who established that the elderly generally still prefer to grow old at home – that is, in the environment they are familiar with, because they are often afraid that moving to an eldercare facility would inevitably\\ncause them to lose their independence. Therefore, they tend to accept the environment where they live the way it is. On the other hand, the article shows that a series\\nof statistically significant differences established indicates that the living environment, which has a strong impact on people’s satisfaction and well being, nonetheless does not offer the same quality of the built social infrastructure to all users (i.e., users with different demographic characteristics).\",\"PeriodicalId\":54093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2019-30-02-002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urbani Izziv-Urban Challenge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2019-30-02-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文探讨了被调查者人口特征(即年龄)的潜在统计显著差异是否可以指出对生活环境的看法的代际差异。采用了定量方法。与年轻的受访者相比,年长的受访者报告了更高的满意度,更强烈的社区社会经济同质性,更好的邻里关系,以及对建筑环境维护的更积极的看法。反过来,年轻的受访者对社区中发生的故意破坏、身体和语言攻击行为表达了更高程度的认同。这些结果是出乎意料的,因为之前的研究表明,与年轻人相比,年龄较大的受访者对建筑环境的满意度的一致程度要低得多,对犯罪的一致程度要高得多。这可以用许多研究者的发现来解释,他们发现老年人通常还是喜欢在家里变老——也就是说,在他们熟悉的环境中,因为他们经常担心搬到养老院会不可避免地使他们失去独立性。因此,他们倾向于接受他们生活的环境。另一方面,本文表明,一系列统计上显著的差异表明,生活环境对人们的满意度和幸福感有很强的影响,但并没有为所有用户(即具有不同人口特征的用户)提供相同质量的建成社会基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in perceptions of the living environment by respondent age
This article explores whether potential statistically significant differences in terms of respondents’ demographic characteristics (i.e., age) can point to intergenerational differences in perceptions of the living environment. A quantitative methodology was used. Older respondents reported higher satisfaction, a stronger feeling of socioeconomic homogeneity of the neighbourhood, better neighbourly relations, and more positive opinions on the maintenance of the built environment than did younger respondents. In turn, younger respondents expressed a higher level of agreement about vandalism and physical and verbal attacks in the neighbourhood. These results were unexpected because previous studies showed significantly lower levels of agreement regarding satisfaction with the built environment and significantly higher levels of agreement about crime among older respondents than younger ones. They can be explained by the findings of many researchers, who established that the elderly generally still prefer to grow old at home – that is, in the environment they are familiar with, because they are often afraid that moving to an eldercare facility would inevitably cause them to lose their independence. Therefore, they tend to accept the environment where they live the way it is. On the other hand, the article shows that a series of statistically significant differences established indicates that the living environment, which has a strong impact on people’s satisfaction and well being, nonetheless does not offer the same quality of the built social infrastructure to all users (i.e., users with different demographic characteristics).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Soobstoj oblikovanja, regulativnega okvira in pogajanj na področju urbanističnega načrtovanja: primer Buenos Airesa, Ciudada de Méxica, in São Paula Združitev odzivov na podnebne spremembe in tematskih področij starosti prijaznih mest: teoretični pregled Razvijajoči se konstrukti množičnega turizma in kapitalistično izkoriščanje obale: od trajnostne gostote in urbane morfologije do ikoničnega megaobjekta Izvirnost ukrajinske narodne arhitekture v Poltavi na začetku 20. stoletja Urbana ekonomija na globalnem jugu: raziskava člankov, objavljenih v reviji The Economist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1