医学生的科研伦理知识

Q4 Medicine Jordan Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-31 DOI:10.35516/jmj.v56i1.228
A. Masri, Areej M. Alfryjat, Dyala Alfryjat, Ro’ya Abu saleem, Shaima’ Elhaj
{"title":"医学生的科研伦理知识","authors":"A. Masri, Areej M. Alfryjat, Dyala Alfryjat, Ro’ya Abu saleem, Shaima’ Elhaj","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v56i1.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical students’ concerns about research publishing increase the need for evaluate their knowledge about research ethics and misconduct issues. This study carried out through Facebook group contains all sixth year medical students at the University of Jordan to evaluate medical students’ knowledge about research ethics using an adopted questionnaire of 3 parts. 158 (39.5%) out of 400 students answered the questionnaire 107 (67.3%) were females and 52 (32.7) were males, only 18 (11.4%) of them had attended extra courses, and 23 (14.6%) had co-authored published manuscript, 129 (81.6%) of them had heard about research ethics, while most of them knew that publication ethics in research are an essential elements of paper writing, their knowledge about other aspects vary from about 4.4% for the time researcher need to wait before resubmit the manuscript again and 42.8% for plagiarism definition. A score of ten had been calculated for each student with an average of 2.4 and median of 3. In conclusion, the students need more training on research ethics and misconduct as their knowledge about it was inadequate.","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Students’ Knowledge about Research Ethics\",\"authors\":\"A. Masri, Areej M. Alfryjat, Dyala Alfryjat, Ro’ya Abu saleem, Shaima’ Elhaj\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jmj.v56i1.228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medical students’ concerns about research publishing increase the need for evaluate their knowledge about research ethics and misconduct issues. This study carried out through Facebook group contains all sixth year medical students at the University of Jordan to evaluate medical students’ knowledge about research ethics using an adopted questionnaire of 3 parts. 158 (39.5%) out of 400 students answered the questionnaire 107 (67.3%) were females and 52 (32.7) were males, only 18 (11.4%) of them had attended extra courses, and 23 (14.6%) had co-authored published manuscript, 129 (81.6%) of them had heard about research ethics, while most of them knew that publication ethics in research are an essential elements of paper writing, their knowledge about other aspects vary from about 4.4% for the time researcher need to wait before resubmit the manuscript again and 42.8% for plagiarism definition. A score of ten had been calculated for each student with an average of 2.4 and median of 3. In conclusion, the students need more training on research ethics and misconduct as their knowledge about it was inadequate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i1.228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i1.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学生对研究发表的关注增加了评估他们对研究伦理和不当行为问题的了解的需要。本研究通过Facebook小组进行,包含约旦大学所有六年级医学生,使用采用的三部分问卷来评估医学生对研究伦理的知识。400名回答问卷的学生中,女性107人(67.3%),男性52人(32.7),158人(39.5%),参加过补课的只有18人(11.4%),合著过论文的有23人(14.6%),听说过研究伦理的有129人(81.6%),大多数人都知道研究中的发表伦理是论文写作的基本要素。他们对其他方面的了解各不相同,对于再次提交论文需要等待的时间约为4.4%,对于剽窃定义约为42.8%。每个学生的平均分为2.4分,中位数为3分,平均分为10分。总之,学生们需要更多的关于研究伦理和不当行为的培训,因为他们对这方面的知识不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Students’ Knowledge about Research Ethics
Medical students’ concerns about research publishing increase the need for evaluate their knowledge about research ethics and misconduct issues. This study carried out through Facebook group contains all sixth year medical students at the University of Jordan to evaluate medical students’ knowledge about research ethics using an adopted questionnaire of 3 parts. 158 (39.5%) out of 400 students answered the questionnaire 107 (67.3%) were females and 52 (32.7) were males, only 18 (11.4%) of them had attended extra courses, and 23 (14.6%) had co-authored published manuscript, 129 (81.6%) of them had heard about research ethics, while most of them knew that publication ethics in research are an essential elements of paper writing, their knowledge about other aspects vary from about 4.4% for the time researcher need to wait before resubmit the manuscript again and 42.8% for plagiarism definition. A score of ten had been calculated for each student with an average of 2.4 and median of 3. In conclusion, the students need more training on research ethics and misconduct as their knowledge about it was inadequate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Hirschsprung Disease in Jordan: A Review and Status Update Poison Centers in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: History, Scope of Services, and Strengths and Weaknesses as Public Healthcare Providers Mediastinal Bronchogenic Cysts: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment Outcomes Safety and Efficacy of Bone Marrow and Adipose Tissue Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Study Irisin’s Mechanism of Action and Levels in Physiological and Pathological Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1