探索绿色消费中的价值-行动差距:风险规避、主观知识和性别差异的作用

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Global Marketing Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376
Oguzhan Essiz, Sidar Yurteri, Carter Mandrik, Aysu Senyuz
{"title":"探索绿色消费中的价值-行动差距:风险规避、主观知识和性别差异的作用","authors":"Oguzhan Essiz, Sidar Yurteri, Carter Mandrik, Aysu Senyuz","doi":"10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Concern for the environment is widespread and consumers generally hold favorable values toward green consumption; however, they often struggle to translate these values into actual green consumption behaviors. This so-called “green gap” has attracted much research interest in recent years, yet questions remain regarding the factors that may influence it and what form this influence takes. Taking the cognitive view in studying green consumption, we seek to shed light on the green gap by empirically testing the roles of risk aversion and subjective knowledge as potential moderators of the green value-action disparity. Proposing a moderated moderation model, we additionally explore the categorical interaction effect of gender differences with risk aversion and subjective knowledge in predicting green purchase behaviors. Using structured survey data (N = 328), we demonstrate that consumers lower in general risk aversion and higher in green subjective knowledge have greater consistency between their values and behaviors in the green consumption context. Further, we reveal a conditional interaction effect of gender in which women were less risk-averse and more knowledgeable than men, resulting in greater green value-behavior consistency. Our study contributes to the growing body of research on sustainable consumption by offering psychographic explanations for the inconsistency between what consumers say and do when it comes to green purchasing. Implications of this study encourage consumer researchers, global managers, and public policy makers, when developing green marketing programs or when seeking to strengthen the green value-action relationship in general, to consider how risk aversion and subjective knowledge may interact with gender differences.","PeriodicalId":15832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Marketing","volume":"36 1","pages":"67 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Value-Action Gap in Green Consumption: Roles of Risk Aversion, Subjective Knowledge, and Gender Differences\",\"authors\":\"Oguzhan Essiz, Sidar Yurteri, Carter Mandrik, Aysu Senyuz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Concern for the environment is widespread and consumers generally hold favorable values toward green consumption; however, they often struggle to translate these values into actual green consumption behaviors. This so-called “green gap” has attracted much research interest in recent years, yet questions remain regarding the factors that may influence it and what form this influence takes. Taking the cognitive view in studying green consumption, we seek to shed light on the green gap by empirically testing the roles of risk aversion and subjective knowledge as potential moderators of the green value-action disparity. Proposing a moderated moderation model, we additionally explore the categorical interaction effect of gender differences with risk aversion and subjective knowledge in predicting green purchase behaviors. Using structured survey data (N = 328), we demonstrate that consumers lower in general risk aversion and higher in green subjective knowledge have greater consistency between their values and behaviors in the green consumption context. Further, we reveal a conditional interaction effect of gender in which women were less risk-averse and more knowledgeable than men, resulting in greater green value-behavior consistency. Our study contributes to the growing body of research on sustainable consumption by offering psychographic explanations for the inconsistency between what consumers say and do when it comes to green purchasing. Implications of this study encourage consumer researchers, global managers, and public policy makers, when developing green marketing programs or when seeking to strengthen the green value-action relationship in general, to consider how risk aversion and subjective knowledge may interact with gender differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Marketing\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"67 - 92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2022.2116376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要人们普遍关注环境问题,消费者普遍对绿色消费抱有好感;然而,他们往往难以将这些价值观转化为实际的绿色消费行为。近年来,这种所谓的“绿色鸿沟”吸引了许多研究兴趣,但可能影响它的因素以及这种影响的形式仍然存在疑问。从认知的角度研究绿色消费,我们试图通过实证检验风险厌恶和主观知识作为绿色价值行动差异潜在调节因素的作用来揭示绿色差距。提出了一个适度调节模型,进一步探讨了性别差异与风险厌恶和主观知识在预测绿色购买行为中的分类交互作用。使用结构化调查数据(N=328),我们证明,在绿色消费背景下,一般风险厌恶程度较低、绿色主观知识水平较高的消费者的价值观和行为之间具有更大的一致性。此外,我们揭示了性别的条件交互效应,在这种效应中,女性比男性更少厌恶风险,更了解知识,从而导致更大的绿色价值行为一致性。我们的研究为越来越多的可持续消费研究做出了贡献,为消费者在绿色购买方面的言行不一致提供了心理学解释。这项研究的意义鼓励消费者研究人员、全球管理者和公共政策制定者在制定绿色营销计划或寻求加强绿色价值-行动关系时,考虑风险厌恶和主观知识如何与性别差异相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Value-Action Gap in Green Consumption: Roles of Risk Aversion, Subjective Knowledge, and Gender Differences
Abstract Concern for the environment is widespread and consumers generally hold favorable values toward green consumption; however, they often struggle to translate these values into actual green consumption behaviors. This so-called “green gap” has attracted much research interest in recent years, yet questions remain regarding the factors that may influence it and what form this influence takes. Taking the cognitive view in studying green consumption, we seek to shed light on the green gap by empirically testing the roles of risk aversion and subjective knowledge as potential moderators of the green value-action disparity. Proposing a moderated moderation model, we additionally explore the categorical interaction effect of gender differences with risk aversion and subjective knowledge in predicting green purchase behaviors. Using structured survey data (N = 328), we demonstrate that consumers lower in general risk aversion and higher in green subjective knowledge have greater consistency between their values and behaviors in the green consumption context. Further, we reveal a conditional interaction effect of gender in which women were less risk-averse and more knowledgeable than men, resulting in greater green value-behavior consistency. Our study contributes to the growing body of research on sustainable consumption by offering psychographic explanations for the inconsistency between what consumers say and do when it comes to green purchasing. Implications of this study encourage consumer researchers, global managers, and public policy makers, when developing green marketing programs or when seeking to strengthen the green value-action relationship in general, to consider how risk aversion and subjective knowledge may interact with gender differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Marketing
Journal of Global Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Stay current on cross-cultural marketing at both micro and macro levels! The Journal of Global Marketing is the top-notch journal packed with the latest global marketing planning and programming strategies, current information, and contemporary research findings on marketing challenges and opportunities that firms, industries, and public sector agencies encounter worldwide. The expert contributors to the journal include leading marketing and international business scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who provide up-to-date practical information vital for management and administrative professionals.
期刊最新文献
Behavioral Science Foundations for Global Marketing Research and Practice: The Model of Goal-Directed Behavior Effects of Money Priming on Sustainable Consumption Attitudes Exploring Cultural Intelligence, Brand Globalness, and Consumer Ethnocentrism: Unveiling Purchase Intentions in the Fast Food Industry in Jordan The Celebrity Influencer: Delineating the Effect of Tourism-Oriented Short Video Marketing on International Tourist Conation Global Trends in Virtual Luxury: Examining Avatar Identification, Virtual Materialism, and Status Consumption in Online Gaming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1