Financial Distress and Audit Report Lags: An Empirical Study in Korea

This study examines the association between a firm’s financial distress and audit report lags. Through this analysis, we intend to reveal whether auditors consider theclients’ financial distress when performing external audits. This study employs 2,786 firmyear observations from 2011 to 2018. The sample of this study consists of companies listedon the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) and the Korea Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (KOSDAQ). We perform OLS regression analysis to test our hypothesis. The OLS regression analysis is conducted through the SAS and STATA programs.We find that there is a significant and positive association between financial distress andaudit report lags. The audit report lags increase as the likelihood of clients’ financial distress increases. The results indicate that audits take different amounts of audit effort whenauditors consider financial distress as a business risk when they conduct audits. In otherwords, we provide evidence that auditors increase the amount of audit effort when thelikelihood of clients’ financial distress is high. In the absence of studies on how externalauditors respond to audited firms' financial distress, this study analyzes whether externalauditors change their audit efforts by assessing the audited firms' financial distress. Second, the empirical result that external auditors actually follow the guidelines related tobusiness risk and financial distress specified in the Korean Auditing Standards supportsthe effectiveness of the business risk-related regulations specified in the Korean AuditingStandards