创造性自我效能感和元认知感受在产生、评估和选择创造性想法时的信息来源:一个元认知视角

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Creative Behavior Pub Date : 2022-07-29 DOI:10.1002/jocb.557
Rogelio Puente-Díaz, Judith Cavazos-Arroyo
{"title":"创造性自我效能感和元认知感受在产生、评估和选择创造性想法时的信息来源:一个元认知视角","authors":"Rogelio Puente-Díaz,&nbsp;Judith Cavazos-Arroyo","doi":"10.1002/jocb.557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In one study, we examined the relationships between pre-task creative self-efficacy, post-task creative confidence, self-rated and judges-rated creativity evaluations, metacognitive feelings, and idea selection under a metacognitive framework. Four hundred and fourteen college students were asked to complete a divergent thinking problem in the domain of marketing and completed several questionnaires measuring pre-task creative self-efficacy, post-task creative confidence, idea evaluation and selection, and metacognitive feelings. Independent judges evaluated the creativity of each idea generated and ranked ideas from the most to the least creative. Results showed positive relationships between pre-task creative self-efficacy and post-task creative confidence, self- and judges-rated creativity evaluations and metacognitive feelings. In addition, metacognitive feelings and self-rated creative evaluations predicted post-task confidence. We also observed evidence for positive connections between metacognitive feelings and self-rated evaluations and greater probability of choosing the first idea brought to mind as the best idea than what was expected by chance. The implications of the results were discussed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"56 4","pages":"647-658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creative Self-Efficacy and Metacognitive Feelings as Sources of Information when Generating, Evaluating, and Selecting Creative Ideas: A Metacognitive Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Rogelio Puente-Díaz,&nbsp;Judith Cavazos-Arroyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jocb.557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In one study, we examined the relationships between pre-task creative self-efficacy, post-task creative confidence, self-rated and judges-rated creativity evaluations, metacognitive feelings, and idea selection under a metacognitive framework. Four hundred and fourteen college students were asked to complete a divergent thinking problem in the domain of marketing and completed several questionnaires measuring pre-task creative self-efficacy, post-task creative confidence, idea evaluation and selection, and metacognitive feelings. Independent judges evaluated the creativity of each idea generated and ranked ideas from the most to the least creative. Results showed positive relationships between pre-task creative self-efficacy and post-task creative confidence, self- and judges-rated creativity evaluations and metacognitive feelings. In addition, metacognitive feelings and self-rated creative evaluations predicted post-task confidence. We also observed evidence for positive connections between metacognitive feelings and self-rated evaluations and greater probability of choosing the first idea brought to mind as the best idea than what was expected by chance. The implications of the results were discussed.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creative Behavior\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"647-658\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creative Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.557\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在一项研究中,我们在元认知框架下考察了任务前创造性自我效能、任务后创造性自信、自我评价和评判评价、元认知感受和想法选择之间的关系。本研究要求414名大学生完成一个市场营销领域的发散性思维问题,并完成任务前创造性自我效能、任务后创造性自信、想法评价和选择以及元认知感受的问卷调查。独立评委评估每个创意的创意,并将创意从高到低进行排序。结果显示,任务前创造性自我效能感与任务后创造性自信、自我评价和评判评价以及元认知感受之间存在正相关关系。此外,元认知感受和自评创造性评价预测任务后自信。我们还观察到元认知感受和自我评价之间存在积极联系的证据,并且选择脑海中第一个想法作为最佳想法的可能性比随机预期的可能性更大。讨论了研究结果的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creative Self-Efficacy and Metacognitive Feelings as Sources of Information when Generating, Evaluating, and Selecting Creative Ideas: A Metacognitive Perspective

In one study, we examined the relationships between pre-task creative self-efficacy, post-task creative confidence, self-rated and judges-rated creativity evaluations, metacognitive feelings, and idea selection under a metacognitive framework. Four hundred and fourteen college students were asked to complete a divergent thinking problem in the domain of marketing and completed several questionnaires measuring pre-task creative self-efficacy, post-task creative confidence, idea evaluation and selection, and metacognitive feelings. Independent judges evaluated the creativity of each idea generated and ranked ideas from the most to the least creative. Results showed positive relationships between pre-task creative self-efficacy and post-task creative confidence, self- and judges-rated creativity evaluations and metacognitive feelings. In addition, metacognitive feelings and self-rated creative evaluations predicted post-task confidence. We also observed evidence for positive connections between metacognitive feelings and self-rated evaluations and greater probability of choosing the first idea brought to mind as the best idea than what was expected by chance. The implications of the results were discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences on Creativity from Life History Theory Novelty Seeking Differences in Temporal Dynamics for Novelty and Appropriateness Processing of Creative Information: An ERP Investigation Collectivism–Individualism Makes the Relationships Between Digital Games Use and Creativity Different The Silver Lining of Workaholism: Its Impact on Employees' Creativity and Presenteeism Explained
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1