获得资金:全球大流行期间的适应性和复原力

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting and Business Research Pub Date : 2023-07-29 DOI:10.1080/00014788.2023.2219153
T. Beck
{"title":"获得资金:全球大流行期间的适应性和复原力","authors":"T. Beck","doi":"10.1080/00014788.2023.2219153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firms’ access to external finance is constrained by information asymmetries between lenders and borrowers, which are inversely related to firm size and economic growth. Pandemic and lockdown measures constituted an extraordinary shock for corporations, including for their funding, mitigated, however, by governments’ fiscal, monetary and regulatory responses. The combined effect of these measures created a virtuous circle between corporates, banks, and sovereigns, avoiding a funding crunch for either and keeping risk premiums at deflated levels. Some of the more recent shocks provide similar justification for government interventions. However, there is a trade-off between government support during tail events and the market distortions that come with such support programmes. The conjecture is that we will continue to see a stronger role for governments during this time of great volatility and a tightening on market-based funding for corporations.","PeriodicalId":7054,"journal":{"name":"Accounting and Business Research","volume":"53 1","pages":"565 - 579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to finance: adaptability and resilience during a global pandemic\",\"authors\":\"T. Beck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00014788.2023.2219153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Firms’ access to external finance is constrained by information asymmetries between lenders and borrowers, which are inversely related to firm size and economic growth. Pandemic and lockdown measures constituted an extraordinary shock for corporations, including for their funding, mitigated, however, by governments’ fiscal, monetary and regulatory responses. The combined effect of these measures created a virtuous circle between corporates, banks, and sovereigns, avoiding a funding crunch for either and keeping risk premiums at deflated levels. Some of the more recent shocks provide similar justification for government interventions. However, there is a trade-off between government support during tail events and the market distortions that come with such support programmes. The conjecture is that we will continue to see a stronger role for governments during this time of great volatility and a tightening on market-based funding for corporations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting and Business Research\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"565 - 579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting and Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2023.2219153\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting and Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2023.2219153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

企业获得外部融资的机会受到贷款人和借款人之间信息不对称的限制,而信息不对称与企业规模和经济增长呈负相关。大流行和封锁措施对企业构成了非同寻常的冲击,包括对其资金的冲击,然而,政府的财政、货币和监管应对措施缓解了这一冲击。这些措施的综合效果在企业、银行和主权之间创造了一个良性循环,避免了任何一方的资金紧缩,并将风险溢价保持在较低的水平。最近的一些冲击也为政府干预提供了类似的理由。然而,在尾部事件期间的政府支持与此类支持计划带来的市场扭曲之间,存在一种权衡。我们的猜想是,在市场剧烈波动和企业市场融资收紧的时期,我们将继续看到政府发挥更大的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access to finance: adaptability and resilience during a global pandemic
Firms’ access to external finance is constrained by information asymmetries between lenders and borrowers, which are inversely related to firm size and economic growth. Pandemic and lockdown measures constituted an extraordinary shock for corporations, including for their funding, mitigated, however, by governments’ fiscal, monetary and regulatory responses. The combined effect of these measures created a virtuous circle between corporates, banks, and sovereigns, avoiding a funding crunch for either and keeping risk premiums at deflated levels. Some of the more recent shocks provide similar justification for government interventions. However, there is a trade-off between government support during tail events and the market distortions that come with such support programmes. The conjecture is that we will continue to see a stronger role for governments during this time of great volatility and a tightening on market-based funding for corporations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting and Business Research publishes papers containing a substantial and original contribution to knowledge. Papers may cover any area of accounting, broadly defined and including corporate governance, auditing and taxation. However the focus must be accounting, rather than (corporate) finance or general management. Authors may take a theoretical or an empirical approach, using either quantitative or qualitative methods. They may aim to contribute to developing and understanding the role of accounting in business. Papers should be rigorous but also written in a way that makes them intelligible to a wide range of academics and, where appropriate, practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Varied international practice in accounting for extractive activities Corporate governance, firm strategy disclosure, and executive compensation The impact of the JOBS act on the costs of going public: evidence from long-term audit costs Escaping ‘Groundhog Day’: the transformative possibilities of reconceptualising audit Reflections on the past, present and future of the academic/professional interface in accounting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1