全球视野下的生态足迹:国内投资、外国直接投资、民主和制度质量的作用

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Global Responsibility Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.1108/jgr-09-2022-0091
O. N. B. Emmanuel, D. Fonchamnyo, Mamadou Asngar Thierry, G. Dinga
{"title":"全球视野下的生态足迹:国内投资、外国直接投资、民主和制度质量的作用","authors":"O. N. B. Emmanuel, D. Fonchamnyo, Mamadou Asngar Thierry, G. Dinga","doi":"10.1108/jgr-09-2022-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe continuous increase in the negative gap between biocapacity and ecological footprint has remained globally persistent since early 1970. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of foreign capital, domestic capital formation, institutional quality and democracy on ecological footprint within a global panel of 101 countries from 1995 to 2017.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe empirical procedure is based on data mix. To this end, this study uses a battery of testing and estimation approaches both conventional (no cross-sectional dependence [CD]) and novel approaches (accounting for CD). Among the battery of estimation techniques used, there are the dynamic ordinary least square, the mean group, the common correlation effect mean group technique, the augmented mean group technique, the Pooled mean group and the dynamic common correlation effect technique with the desire to obtain outcomes robust to heteroskedasticity, endogeneity, cross-correlation and CD among others.\n\n\nFindings\nThe estimated outcomes indicate that using different estimators’ domestic capital formation consistently degrades the environment through an increase in ecological footprint, while institutional quality consistently enhances the quality of the environment. Further, the outcome reveals that, though foreign capital inflow degrades the environment, the time period is essential, as it shows a short-run environmental improvement and a long-run environmental degradation. Democratic activities show a mixed outcome with short-run degrading effect and a long-run enhancement effect on environmental quality.\n\n\nPractical implications\nGreen investment should be the policy target of all economies, and these policies should be adopted to target both domestic capital and foreign capital alike. Second, the adoption of democratic practices will produce good leaders that will not just design short-term policies to blindfold the populace temporary but those that will produce long-term-oriented practices that will better and enhance the quality of the environment through the reduction of the global footprint. Equally, enhancing the institutional framework like respect for the rule of law in matters of abatement should be encouraged.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough much research on the role of macroeconomic indicators on environmental quality has been done this far, democratic practices, intuitional quality and domestic capital have been given little attention. This research fills this gap by considering robust empirical techniques.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological footprint in a global perspective: the role of domestic investment, FDI, democracy and institutional quality\",\"authors\":\"O. N. B. Emmanuel, D. Fonchamnyo, Mamadou Asngar Thierry, G. Dinga\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jgr-09-2022-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe continuous increase in the negative gap between biocapacity and ecological footprint has remained globally persistent since early 1970. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of foreign capital, domestic capital formation, institutional quality and democracy on ecological footprint within a global panel of 101 countries from 1995 to 2017.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe empirical procedure is based on data mix. To this end, this study uses a battery of testing and estimation approaches both conventional (no cross-sectional dependence [CD]) and novel approaches (accounting for CD). Among the battery of estimation techniques used, there are the dynamic ordinary least square, the mean group, the common correlation effect mean group technique, the augmented mean group technique, the Pooled mean group and the dynamic common correlation effect technique with the desire to obtain outcomes robust to heteroskedasticity, endogeneity, cross-correlation and CD among others.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe estimated outcomes indicate that using different estimators’ domestic capital formation consistently degrades the environment through an increase in ecological footprint, while institutional quality consistently enhances the quality of the environment. Further, the outcome reveals that, though foreign capital inflow degrades the environment, the time period is essential, as it shows a short-run environmental improvement and a long-run environmental degradation. Democratic activities show a mixed outcome with short-run degrading effect and a long-run enhancement effect on environmental quality.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nGreen investment should be the policy target of all economies, and these policies should be adopted to target both domestic capital and foreign capital alike. Second, the adoption of democratic practices will produce good leaders that will not just design short-term policies to blindfold the populace temporary but those that will produce long-term-oriented practices that will better and enhance the quality of the environment through the reduction of the global footprint. Equally, enhancing the institutional framework like respect for the rule of law in matters of abatement should be encouraged.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nAlthough much research on the role of macroeconomic indicators on environmental quality has been done this far, democratic practices, intuitional quality and domestic capital have been given little attention. This research fills this gap by considering robust empirical techniques.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-09-2022-0091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-09-2022-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:自1970年初以来,全球生物承载力与生态足迹之间的负差距持续扩大。本研究的目的是在1995年至2017年的101个国家的全球面板中检验外国资本、国内资本形成、制度质量和民主对生态足迹的影响。设计/方法/方法经验程序是基于数据混合。为此,本研究使用了一系列测试和估计方法,包括传统的(无横截面依赖性[CD])和新颖的方法(考虑CD)。在使用的一系列估计技术中,有动态普通最小二乘、平均组、共同相关效应平均组技术、增强平均组技术、混合平均组和动态共同相关效应技术,以期获得对异方差、内生性、互相关和CD等稳健性的结果。结果表明,不同估算者的国内资本形成通过增加生态足迹导致环境持续恶化,而制度质量则持续提高环境质量。此外,结果表明,虽然外资流入使环境恶化,但时间周期是必不可少的,因为它显示了短期的环境改善和长期的环境恶化。民主活动的结果好坏参半,既有短期的退化效应,也有长期的环境质量提升效应。绿色投资应该是所有经济体的政策目标,这些政策应该同时针对国内资本和外国资本。其次,采用民主实践将产生优秀的领导人,他们不仅会设计短期政策,暂时蒙蔽民众的眼睛,而且还会制定以长期为导向的做法,通过减少全球足迹来改善和提高环境质量。同样,应鼓励加强体制框架,例如在减排问题上尊重法治。原创性/价值虽然到目前为止已经对宏观经济指标对环境质量的作用进行了许多研究,但民主实践、直观质量和国内资本却很少受到关注。本研究通过考虑稳健的经验技术填补了这一空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ecological footprint in a global perspective: the role of domestic investment, FDI, democracy and institutional quality
Purpose The continuous increase in the negative gap between biocapacity and ecological footprint has remained globally persistent since early 1970. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of foreign capital, domestic capital formation, institutional quality and democracy on ecological footprint within a global panel of 101 countries from 1995 to 2017. Design/methodology/approach The empirical procedure is based on data mix. To this end, this study uses a battery of testing and estimation approaches both conventional (no cross-sectional dependence [CD]) and novel approaches (accounting for CD). Among the battery of estimation techniques used, there are the dynamic ordinary least square, the mean group, the common correlation effect mean group technique, the augmented mean group technique, the Pooled mean group and the dynamic common correlation effect technique with the desire to obtain outcomes robust to heteroskedasticity, endogeneity, cross-correlation and CD among others. Findings The estimated outcomes indicate that using different estimators’ domestic capital formation consistently degrades the environment through an increase in ecological footprint, while institutional quality consistently enhances the quality of the environment. Further, the outcome reveals that, though foreign capital inflow degrades the environment, the time period is essential, as it shows a short-run environmental improvement and a long-run environmental degradation. Democratic activities show a mixed outcome with short-run degrading effect and a long-run enhancement effect on environmental quality. Practical implications Green investment should be the policy target of all economies, and these policies should be adopted to target both domestic capital and foreign capital alike. Second, the adoption of democratic practices will produce good leaders that will not just design short-term policies to blindfold the populace temporary but those that will produce long-term-oriented practices that will better and enhance the quality of the environment through the reduction of the global footprint. Equally, enhancing the institutional framework like respect for the rule of law in matters of abatement should be encouraged. Originality/value Although much research on the role of macroeconomic indicators on environmental quality has been done this far, democratic practices, intuitional quality and domestic capital have been given little attention. This research fills this gap by considering robust empirical techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Corporate social responsibility and gig worker commitment: empowerment and trust as mediators A concise autobiography of microfinancing: the pursuit of a world without poverty Sustainability in banking literature: review and synthesis of thematic structure Linking corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment: the role of employee job satisfaction Institutional pressure and responsible innovation: how big data analytics adoption drives manufacturing SMEs toward competitiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1