社会关系的本质与表象:罗马帝国的定居者与地主

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY Sociedades Precapitalistas Pub Date : 2020-05-08 DOI:10.24215/22505121e044
Marcelo Emiliano Perelman Fajardo
{"title":"社会关系的本质与表象:罗马帝国的定居者与地主","authors":"Marcelo Emiliano Perelman Fajardo","doi":"10.24215/22505121e044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historiography has traditionally analyzed the problem of land tenure in Ancient Rome from a formalist perspective, characterizing the social bond between the tenant and the owner only from the contractual point of view, as two autonomous subjects who establish a relationship voluntarily and free. But the narrowness of this approach, derived mainly from the great importance of the development of law in Rome, is not enough when we have to explain different phenomena that can be seen in the sources, where we can see too certain features of ‘personal’ dependence of the relationship between tenants and owners. In the analysis of these aspects, we will see that they do not imply the inexistence of economic interest in this type of relationship, but rather its reason for being is to hide this interest for its effective realization. It is about appearances, although necessary, acquired by the economic interest in pre-capitalist societies, and that these boast to hide.","PeriodicalId":40822,"journal":{"name":"Sociedades Precapitalistas","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esencia y apariencia de las relaciones sociales: colonos y propietarios en el imperio romano\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Emiliano Perelman Fajardo\",\"doi\":\"10.24215/22505121e044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The historiography has traditionally analyzed the problem of land tenure in Ancient Rome from a formalist perspective, characterizing the social bond between the tenant and the owner only from the contractual point of view, as two autonomous subjects who establish a relationship voluntarily and free. But the narrowness of this approach, derived mainly from the great importance of the development of law in Rome, is not enough when we have to explain different phenomena that can be seen in the sources, where we can see too certain features of ‘personal’ dependence of the relationship between tenants and owners. In the analysis of these aspects, we will see that they do not imply the inexistence of economic interest in this type of relationship, but rather its reason for being is to hide this interest for its effective realization. It is about appearances, although necessary, acquired by the economic interest in pre-capitalist societies, and that these boast to hide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociedades Precapitalistas\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociedades Precapitalistas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24215/22505121e044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociedades Precapitalistas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/22505121e044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

史学传统上从形式主义的角度来分析古罗马的土地保有权问题,仅从契约的角度来描述佃户和所有人之间的社会纽带,作为自愿和自由建立关系的两个自主主体。但是,这种方法的狭隘性,主要源于罗马法律发展的重要性,当我们必须解释可以在来源中看到的不同现象时,是不够的,在来源中,我们可以看到租户和业主之间关系的“个人”依赖的太多特征。在对这些方面的分析中,我们会发现,它们并不意味着这种关系中不存在经济利益,而是其存在的原因是为了隐藏这种利益,以使其有效实现。这是关于前资本主义社会的经济利益所获得的表象,尽管是必要的,但这些表象是为了掩饰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Esencia y apariencia de las relaciones sociales: colonos y propietarios en el imperio romano
The historiography has traditionally analyzed the problem of land tenure in Ancient Rome from a formalist perspective, characterizing the social bond between the tenant and the owner only from the contractual point of view, as two autonomous subjects who establish a relationship voluntarily and free. But the narrowness of this approach, derived mainly from the great importance of the development of law in Rome, is not enough when we have to explain different phenomena that can be seen in the sources, where we can see too certain features of ‘personal’ dependence of the relationship between tenants and owners. In the analysis of these aspects, we will see that they do not imply the inexistence of economic interest in this type of relationship, but rather its reason for being is to hide this interest for its effective realization. It is about appearances, although necessary, acquired by the economic interest in pre-capitalist societies, and that these boast to hide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Reseña del libro de Plebani, Tiziana. El canon ignorado. La escritura de las mujeres en Europa (S. XIII-XX). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Ampersand, 2022, 480 páginas Proceso productivo y Verlagssystem: la industria textil de Murcia durante la Baja Edad Media La Declaración 222 de los Textos de las Pirámides como liturgia “dialógica” The theology of nonviolence in the writings of Petr Chelčický during the late Middle Ages La renta feudal como relación de dominación. Notas sobre la obligación de alojar y abastecer a la comitiva señorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1