卢卡的手在法利赛人和公众的寓言中

Piotr Blajer
{"title":"卢卡的手在法利赛人和公众的寓言中","authors":"Piotr Blajer","doi":"10.12775/bpth.2021.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to answer the question whether Luke 18:9-14 presents an original tradition dating back to the teaching of Jesus or is entirely the work of the third evangelist. As the parable is not found in the other synoptic gospels to compare with the Lucan text, the author approaches the question by first studying the language of the parable and then discussing the possible context in which the parable could have been pronounced. He then examines the other synoptic gospels to see whether a similar teaching exists even though there is no direct parallel passage. Although none of these elements considered on its own is satisfactory to establish the origin of the parable, taken together they provide convincing evidence that it may have had its origin in Jesus’ teaching.","PeriodicalId":37181,"journal":{"name":"Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La mano di Luca nella parabola del fariseo e del pubblicano\",\"authors\":\"Piotr Blajer\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/bpth.2021.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to answer the question whether Luke 18:9-14 presents an original tradition dating back to the teaching of Jesus or is entirely the work of the third evangelist. As the parable is not found in the other synoptic gospels to compare with the Lucan text, the author approaches the question by first studying the language of the parable and then discussing the possible context in which the parable could have been pronounced. He then examines the other synoptic gospels to see whether a similar teaching exists even though there is no direct parallel passage. Although none of these elements considered on its own is satisfactory to establish the origin of the parable, taken together they provide convincing evidence that it may have had its origin in Jesus’ teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/bpth.2021.024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/bpth.2021.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是回答这样一个问题:路加福音18:9-14是否呈现了一个可以追溯到耶稣教导的原始传统,或者完全是第三位福音传道者的作品。由于在其他对观福音书中找不到这个比喻与卢坎文本相比较,作者首先研究了比喻的语言,然后讨论了这个比喻可能被发音的上下文,从而解决了这个问题。然后他检查了其他对观福音书,看看是否存在类似的教导,即使没有直接的平行段落。虽然单独考虑这些因素都不能令人满意地确定比喻的起源,但综合起来,它们提供了令人信服的证据,表明它可能起源于耶稣的教导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La mano di Luca nella parabola del fariseo e del pubblicano
The study aims to answer the question whether Luke 18:9-14 presents an original tradition dating back to the teaching of Jesus or is entirely the work of the third evangelist. As the parable is not found in the other synoptic gospels to compare with the Lucan text, the author approaches the question by first studying the language of the parable and then discussing the possible context in which the parable could have been pronounced. He then examines the other synoptic gospels to see whether a similar teaching exists even though there is no direct parallel passage. Although none of these elements considered on its own is satisfactory to establish the origin of the parable, taken together they provide convincing evidence that it may have had its origin in Jesus’ teaching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia
Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Grzech i cnota w Księdze Mądrości jako konsekwencja fundamentalnego wyboru między śmiercią a Mądrością Profil zainteresowań biblijnych ks. Floriana Pilthowskiego (XVI w.) Co po dokumencie "Natchnienie i prawda Pisma Świętego"? Is the Charism of Biblical Inspiration “Open”? The Answer of the Revelation of John Prophetic Inspiration in the Light of the Prophet’s Relationship with God in the Book of Jeremiah
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1