通过可持续发展目标(SDGs)对学术机构的研究成果进行分类的方法

Patricio Cortés-Rodríguez, Renzo Rondanelli-Delpiano, Paola Santander-Meneses, Ricardo Vilches-Vargas
{"title":"通过可持续发展目标(SDGs)对学术机构的研究成果进行分类的方法","authors":"Patricio Cortés-Rodríguez, Renzo Rondanelli-Delpiano, Paola Santander-Meneses, Ricardo Vilches-Vargas","doi":"10.35241/emeraldopenres.14355.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This article presents a methodology to categorize scientific publications according to the targets of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations. For the above, a dataset with bibliographic and descriptive attributes of 2,379 articles from 2017 by co-authors affiliated to the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, was used. Methods: The methodology considered three relevant and consecutive milestones: establishment of the reading level that was applied for each publication record, which considers a proportional amount of information; assignment of one of the 18 categories identified for the analysis of the information, which include the 17 SDGs and the option \"unclassified\" and one of the 169 subcategories corresponding to the specific goals; and, finally, recording the status of the review process carried out, which allowed control of the progress and quality of the cross-review. Results: The results show that 58.6% of the articles contribute to a primary target, of these 233 contribute to a secondary target; goals 3, 4, 9, and 11 are the most frequent in the process of assigning SDGs. There is an 81% increase in the use of alphanumeric targets when they are assigned as secondary targets. At the same time, cross-checking is shown to be beneficial when allowing the reclassification of 190 articles to some of the targets. Finally, it is established that levels 2 and 3 enabled better classification, given that the contents considered provide more information; however, it is significant that through level 1, 355 articles were categorized as \"unclassified\". Conclusions: It is concluded that the methodology allows for a conclusive, exhaustive, rigorous, extensive, and varied classification through the different milestones and actions carried out, providing strategic information for decision making and research management in the academy-society relationship.","PeriodicalId":91015,"journal":{"name":"Emerald open research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology to categorize the research output of academic institutions, through the Sustainable Development goals (SDGs)\",\"authors\":\"Patricio Cortés-Rodríguez, Renzo Rondanelli-Delpiano, Paola Santander-Meneses, Ricardo Vilches-Vargas\",\"doi\":\"10.35241/emeraldopenres.14355.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This article presents a methodology to categorize scientific publications according to the targets of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations. For the above, a dataset with bibliographic and descriptive attributes of 2,379 articles from 2017 by co-authors affiliated to the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, was used. Methods: The methodology considered three relevant and consecutive milestones: establishment of the reading level that was applied for each publication record, which considers a proportional amount of information; assignment of one of the 18 categories identified for the analysis of the information, which include the 17 SDGs and the option \\\"unclassified\\\" and one of the 169 subcategories corresponding to the specific goals; and, finally, recording the status of the review process carried out, which allowed control of the progress and quality of the cross-review. Results: The results show that 58.6% of the articles contribute to a primary target, of these 233 contribute to a secondary target; goals 3, 4, 9, and 11 are the most frequent in the process of assigning SDGs. There is an 81% increase in the use of alphanumeric targets when they are assigned as secondary targets. At the same time, cross-checking is shown to be beneficial when allowing the reclassification of 190 articles to some of the targets. Finally, it is established that levels 2 and 3 enabled better classification, given that the contents considered provide more information; however, it is significant that through level 1, 355 articles were categorized as \\\"unclassified\\\". Conclusions: It is concluded that the methodology allows for a conclusive, exhaustive, rigorous, extensive, and varied classification through the different milestones and actions carried out, providing strategic information for decision making and research management in the academy-society relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emerald open research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emerald open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14355.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14355.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:本文介绍了一种根据联合国17个可持续发展目标(SDGs)的具体目标对科学出版物进行分类的方法。对于上述研究,我们使用了一个数据集,该数据集包含了2017年2379篇文章的书目和描述性属性,这些文章是由隶属于智利教廷大学Católica的共同作者撰写的,并在Web of Science和Scopus数据库中进行了索引。方法:该方法考虑了三个相关且连续的里程碑:建立适用于每个出版记录的阅读水平,该水平考虑了一定比例的信息量;指定用于分析信息的18个类别中的一个,其中包括17个可持续发展目标和“未分类”选项,以及与具体目标对应的169个子类别中的一个;最后,记录所进行的评审过程的状态,这样可以控制交叉评审的进度和质量。结果:58.6%的文章对一级目标有贡献,其中233篇文章对二级目标有贡献;在分配可持续发展目标的过程中,目标3、4、9和11是最常见的。当字母数字目标被指定为次要目标时,它们的使用增加了81%。同时,交叉检查在允许将190篇文章重新分类到某些目标时是有益的。最后,考虑到所考虑的内容提供了更多的信息,可以确定第2级和第3级能够更好地分类;然而,值得注意的是,在第1355级中,有355篇文章被归类为“未分类”。结论:该方法通过不同的里程碑和行动进行了结论性的、详尽的、严格的、广泛的和多样化的分类,为学院-社会关系中的决策和研究管理提供战略信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodology to categorize the research output of academic institutions, through the Sustainable Development goals (SDGs)
Background: This article presents a methodology to categorize scientific publications according to the targets of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations. For the above, a dataset with bibliographic and descriptive attributes of 2,379 articles from 2017 by co-authors affiliated to the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases, was used. Methods: The methodology considered three relevant and consecutive milestones: establishment of the reading level that was applied for each publication record, which considers a proportional amount of information; assignment of one of the 18 categories identified for the analysis of the information, which include the 17 SDGs and the option "unclassified" and one of the 169 subcategories corresponding to the specific goals; and, finally, recording the status of the review process carried out, which allowed control of the progress and quality of the cross-review. Results: The results show that 58.6% of the articles contribute to a primary target, of these 233 contribute to a secondary target; goals 3, 4, 9, and 11 are the most frequent in the process of assigning SDGs. There is an 81% increase in the use of alphanumeric targets when they are assigned as secondary targets. At the same time, cross-checking is shown to be beneficial when allowing the reclassification of 190 articles to some of the targets. Finally, it is established that levels 2 and 3 enabled better classification, given that the contents considered provide more information; however, it is significant that through level 1, 355 articles were categorized as "unclassified". Conclusions: It is concluded that the methodology allows for a conclusive, exhaustive, rigorous, extensive, and varied classification through the different milestones and actions carried out, providing strategic information for decision making and research management in the academy-society relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Paradoxes and dilemmas of responsible leadership in the mining industries of emerging economies – it is complex Secondary school teachers' perception of quality management practices in Ethiopia: Implications for quality education for all On the global emergence of responsible leadership: purpose and social identity Estimating annual average daily traffic (AADT) data on low-volume roads with the cokriging technique and census/population data Family violence screening and disclosure response: A public mental health service consumer survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1