外周灌注指数(PPI)能否预测急诊科新冠肺炎患者的疾病严重程度?

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-06-09 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1748776
M. Korkut, C. Bedel, F. Selvi, Ökkeş Zortuk
{"title":"外周灌注指数(PPI)能否预测急诊科新冠肺炎患者的疾病严重程度?","authors":"M. Korkut, C. Bedel, F. Selvi, Ökkeş Zortuk","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1748776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes significant mortality and morbidity in severe patients.\n Objective In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between COVID-19 disease severity and peripheral perfusion index (PPI).\n Patients and Methods This prospective observational study included COVID-19 patients admitted to the tertiary hospital emergency department. Basal clinical and demographic data of the patients and PPI values at the time of admission were recorded. The patients were categorized to severe and nonsevere groups according to clinical severity. The relationship between COVID-19 severity and PPI was examined in comparison with the control group.\n Results A total of 324 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. COVID-19 (+) was detected in 180 of these patients. Ninety-two of the COVID-19 (+) patients were in the severe group, and 88 of them were in the non severe group. Note that 164 COVID-19 (–) patients were in the control group. PPI average was found to be 1.44 ± 1.12 in the severe group, and 3.69 ± 2.51 in the nonsevere group. PPI average was found to be significantly lower in the severe group than the nonsevere group (p< 0.01) As for the nonsevere group and control group, PPI averages were found to be 3.69 ± 2.51 and3.54 ± 2.32, respectively, and a significant difference was determined between the two groups (p< 0.05). PPI COVID-19 severity predicting activity was calculated as area under the curve: 0.833, sensitivity:70.4%, andspecificity:71%(p = 0.025) at 2.2 cutoff value.\n Conclusion The results of our study showed that PPI is an easy-to-apply and useful parameter in the emergency department in determining the severity of COVID-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":13067,"journal":{"name":"Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Peripheral Perfusion Index (PPI) Predict Disease Severity in COVID-19 Patients in the Emergency Department?\",\"authors\":\"M. Korkut, C. Bedel, F. Selvi, Ökkeş Zortuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1748776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes significant mortality and morbidity in severe patients.\\n Objective In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between COVID-19 disease severity and peripheral perfusion index (PPI).\\n Patients and Methods This prospective observational study included COVID-19 patients admitted to the tertiary hospital emergency department. Basal clinical and demographic data of the patients and PPI values at the time of admission were recorded. The patients were categorized to severe and nonsevere groups according to clinical severity. The relationship between COVID-19 severity and PPI was examined in comparison with the control group.\\n Results A total of 324 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. COVID-19 (+) was detected in 180 of these patients. Ninety-two of the COVID-19 (+) patients were in the severe group, and 88 of them were in the non severe group. Note that 164 COVID-19 (–) patients were in the control group. PPI average was found to be 1.44 ± 1.12 in the severe group, and 3.69 ± 2.51 in the nonsevere group. PPI average was found to be significantly lower in the severe group than the nonsevere group (p< 0.01) As for the nonsevere group and control group, PPI averages were found to be 3.69 ± 2.51 and3.54 ± 2.32, respectively, and a significant difference was determined between the two groups (p< 0.05). PPI COVID-19 severity predicting activity was calculated as area under the curve: 0.833, sensitivity:70.4%, andspecificity:71%(p = 0.025) at 2.2 cutoff value.\\n Conclusion The results of our study showed that PPI is an easy-to-apply and useful parameter in the emergency department in determining the severity of COVID-19 patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在重症患者中造成显著的死亡率和发病率。目的探讨新冠肺炎患者病情严重程度与外周血灌注指数(PPI)的关系。患者和方法本前瞻性观察研究纳入三级医院急诊科收治的COVID-19患者。记录患者的基本临床和人口学资料以及入院时的PPI值。根据临床严重程度分为重症组和非重症组。与对照组比较COVID-19严重程度与PPI之间的关系。结果共纳入324例符合纳入标准的患者。其中180例患者检出新冠病毒阳性。新冠肺炎(+)患者中重症组92例,非重症组88例。注意,164例COVID-19(-)患者为对照组。重度组PPI平均值为1.44±1.12,非重度组PPI平均值为3.69±2.51。重症组PPI均值显著低于非重症组(p< 0.01),非重症组PPI均值为3.69±2.51,对照组PPI均值为3.54±2.32,两组比较差异有统计学意义(p< 0.05)。PPI COVID-19严重程度预测活动性的曲线下面积为0.833,灵敏度为70.4%,特异性为71%(p = 0.025),截止值为2.2。结论本研究结果表明,PPI是急诊科判断COVID-19患者严重程度的一个简单易行且有用的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Peripheral Perfusion Index (PPI) Predict Disease Severity in COVID-19 Patients in the Emergency Department?
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes significant mortality and morbidity in severe patients. Objective In this study, we aimed to examine the relationship between COVID-19 disease severity and peripheral perfusion index (PPI). Patients and Methods This prospective observational study included COVID-19 patients admitted to the tertiary hospital emergency department. Basal clinical and demographic data of the patients and PPI values at the time of admission were recorded. The patients were categorized to severe and nonsevere groups according to clinical severity. The relationship between COVID-19 severity and PPI was examined in comparison with the control group. Results A total of 324 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. COVID-19 (+) was detected in 180 of these patients. Ninety-two of the COVID-19 (+) patients were in the severe group, and 88 of them were in the non severe group. Note that 164 COVID-19 (–) patients were in the control group. PPI average was found to be 1.44 ± 1.12 in the severe group, and 3.69 ± 2.51 in the nonsevere group. PPI average was found to be significantly lower in the severe group than the nonsevere group (p< 0.01) As for the nonsevere group and control group, PPI averages were found to be 3.69 ± 2.51 and3.54 ± 2.32, respectively, and a significant difference was determined between the two groups (p< 0.05). PPI COVID-19 severity predicting activity was calculated as area under the curve: 0.833, sensitivity:70.4%, andspecificity:71%(p = 0.025) at 2.2 cutoff value. Conclusion The results of our study showed that PPI is an easy-to-apply and useful parameter in the emergency department in determining the severity of COVID-19 patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Academic Medical Career versus Private Medical Practice: A Guide to the Right Decision! Expecting the Unexpected: Schistosomial Appendicitis in Nonendemic Area Causes of Original Kidney Disease among Libyan Kidney Transplant Recipients IJMBS at the End of 2023: An Impact Factor and a New Platform Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1