对环境感知、态度、地点依恋及其空间特征的选择性回顾。南非和全球视角的对比

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Reviews Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI:10.1139/er-2021-0107
S. Dlamini, S. Tesfamichael, T. Mokhele
{"title":"对环境感知、态度、地点依恋及其空间特征的选择性回顾。南非和全球视角的对比","authors":"S. Dlamini, S. Tesfamichael, T. Mokhele","doi":"10.1139/er-2021-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This selective review points to a rich body of literature on environmental perceptions, attitudes and place attachment in South Africa. Research works highlight that the global-North dominates in human-nature relations studies, with relatively less work done in less developed economies like sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa. Additionally, the review of the literature on these concepts points to the complexity of these aspects in terms of their conceptual distinctions, amorphous nature, and hence the difficulties surrounding their spatial characterisation. This selective review aims to provide a contrast between South African and international studies on these concepts. This review notes that human-nature studies in South Africa are dominated by place research, which is largely an influence of the country’s spatio-political setting, where social engineering was influenced by past policies that had substantial impacts on the arrangement of space, identity, and belonging. Additionally, the review notes the dearth of literature that has attempted to spatially characterise human-nature relations in the country. Spatially characterising these concepts could be beneficial for urban and environmental planners and policymakers in the country, and assist in initiatives meant to reduce spatial inequalities in the country","PeriodicalId":50514,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A selective review of environmental perceptions, attitudes, place attachment and their spatial characterisation. Contrasting the South African and global perspectives\",\"authors\":\"S. Dlamini, S. Tesfamichael, T. Mokhele\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/er-2021-0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This selective review points to a rich body of literature on environmental perceptions, attitudes and place attachment in South Africa. Research works highlight that the global-North dominates in human-nature relations studies, with relatively less work done in less developed economies like sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa. Additionally, the review of the literature on these concepts points to the complexity of these aspects in terms of their conceptual distinctions, amorphous nature, and hence the difficulties surrounding their spatial characterisation. This selective review aims to provide a contrast between South African and international studies on these concepts. This review notes that human-nature studies in South Africa are dominated by place research, which is largely an influence of the country’s spatio-political setting, where social engineering was influenced by past policies that had substantial impacts on the arrangement of space, identity, and belonging. Additionally, the review notes the dearth of literature that has attempted to spatially characterise human-nature relations in the country. Spatially characterising these concepts could be beneficial for urban and environmental planners and policymakers in the country, and assist in initiatives meant to reduce spatial inequalities in the country\",\"PeriodicalId\":50514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2021-0107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2021-0107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇选择性的综述指出,南非有大量关于环境感知、态度和地方依恋的文献。研究工作强调,全球北方在人性关系研究中占主导地位,在撒哈拉以南非洲和南非等欠发达经济体所做的工作相对较少。此外,对这些概念的文献综述指出了这些方面的复杂性,即它们的概念区别、无定形性质,以及围绕它们的空间特征的困难。这一选择性审查旨在对比南非和国际上对这些概念的研究。这篇综述指出,南非的人性研究以地方研究为主,这在很大程度上是该国空间政治环境的影响,在该国,社会工程受到过去对空间、身份和归属安排产生重大影响的政策的影响。此外,该评论指出,缺乏试图在空间上描述该国人性关系的文献。对这些概念进行空间表征可能有利于该国的城市和环境规划者和政策制定者,并有助于减少该国空间不平等的举措
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A selective review of environmental perceptions, attitudes, place attachment and their spatial characterisation. Contrasting the South African and global perspectives
This selective review points to a rich body of literature on environmental perceptions, attitudes and place attachment in South Africa. Research works highlight that the global-North dominates in human-nature relations studies, with relatively less work done in less developed economies like sub-Saharan Africa and South Africa. Additionally, the review of the literature on these concepts points to the complexity of these aspects in terms of their conceptual distinctions, amorphous nature, and hence the difficulties surrounding their spatial characterisation. This selective review aims to provide a contrast between South African and international studies on these concepts. This review notes that human-nature studies in South Africa are dominated by place research, which is largely an influence of the country’s spatio-political setting, where social engineering was influenced by past policies that had substantial impacts on the arrangement of space, identity, and belonging. Additionally, the review notes the dearth of literature that has attempted to spatially characterise human-nature relations in the country. Spatially characterising these concepts could be beneficial for urban and environmental planners and policymakers in the country, and assist in initiatives meant to reduce spatial inequalities in the country
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Reviews
Environmental Reviews 环境科学-环境科学
自引率
3.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Published since 1993, Environmental Reviews is a quarterly journal that presents authoritative literature reviews on a wide range of environmental science and associated environmental studies topics, with emphasis on the effects on and response of both natural and manmade ecosystems to anthropogenic stress. The authorship and scope are international, with critical literature reviews submitted and invited on such topics as sustainability, water supply management, climate change, harvesting impacts, acid rain, pesticide use, lake acidification, air and marine pollution, oil and gas development, biological control, food chain biomagnification, rehabilitation of polluted aquatic systems, erosion, forestry, bio-indicators of environmental stress, conservation of biodiversity, and many other environmental issues.
期刊最新文献
A review of the assessment techniques used for population monitoring at different life stages of sturgeons Review of climate change and drinking water supply systems: employee perspectives and potential tools for adaptation The Acadian Forest of New Brunswick in the 21st century: what shifting heat and water balance implies for future stand dynamics and management Managing exploitation of freshwater species and aggregates to protect and restore freshwater biodiversity Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Assessing Watershed Scale Pollution Risk: A Review of Combined Approaches and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1