Ojukwu的Biafra:尼日利亚内战中的救济走廊、军火走私和支离破碎的外交

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY War & Society Pub Date : 2021-06-21 DOI:10.1080/07292473.2021.1942625
T. Bello
{"title":"Ojukwu的Biafra:尼日利亚内战中的救济走廊、军火走私和支离破碎的外交","authors":"T. Bello","doi":"10.1080/07292473.2021.1942625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the rationale behind, or motivation, for the Biafran head of government, General Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu’s sustained objection both to proposed mercy corridor and daylight relief flights into Biafra by the International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC) despite the prevalent starvation in Biafra during the Nigerian Civil War. Ojukwu’s public justification for his objection to the proposals was that there was a possibility that the Nigerian forces could poison the food and medicine destined to Biafra. He also argued that agreement to daylight flights could expose Biafra to bombardment by Nigerian forces. Surprisingly, some scholars have either ignored this aspect of the conflict or accepted Ojukwu’s claims in their analysis of the relief debates. Using mainly archival sources and interviews, this paper argues that while it may be possible for Biafra’s infrastructure to be attacked by federal forces, Ojukwu’s main reason of objection to the proposals was to keep open the lines through which Biafra was receiving its arms and ammunition from external sources.","PeriodicalId":43656,"journal":{"name":"War & Society","volume":"40 1","pages":"206 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07292473.2021.1942625","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ojukwu’s Biafra: Relief Corridor, Arms Smuggling, and Broken Diplomacy in the Nigerian Civil War\",\"authors\":\"T. Bello\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07292473.2021.1942625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the rationale behind, or motivation, for the Biafran head of government, General Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu’s sustained objection both to proposed mercy corridor and daylight relief flights into Biafra by the International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC) despite the prevalent starvation in Biafra during the Nigerian Civil War. Ojukwu’s public justification for his objection to the proposals was that there was a possibility that the Nigerian forces could poison the food and medicine destined to Biafra. He also argued that agreement to daylight flights could expose Biafra to bombardment by Nigerian forces. Surprisingly, some scholars have either ignored this aspect of the conflict or accepted Ojukwu’s claims in their analysis of the relief debates. Using mainly archival sources and interviews, this paper argues that while it may be possible for Biafra’s infrastructure to be attacked by federal forces, Ojukwu’s main reason of objection to the proposals was to keep open the lines through which Biafra was receiving its arms and ammunition from external sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"War & Society\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"206 - 224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07292473.2021.1942625\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"War & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07292473.2021.1942625\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07292473.2021.1942625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了比亚夫拉政府首脑Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu将军持续反对红十字国际委员会(ICRC)提议的仁慈走廊和进入比亚夫拉市的日间救援航班的理由或动机,尽管尼日利亚内战期间比亚夫拉普遍存在饥饿。Ojukwu反对这些提议的公开理由是,尼日利亚军队有可能对运往比亚夫拉的食品和药品下毒。他还辩称,同意白天飞行可能会使比亚夫拉面临尼日利亚军队的轰炸。令人惊讶的是,一些学者在分析救济辩论时,要么忽略了冲突的这一方面,要么接受了Ojukwu的主张。本文主要利用档案来源和采访,认为虽然比亚夫拉的基础设施可能受到联邦部队的袭击,但奥朱克武反对这些提议的主要原因是保持比亚夫拉从外部来源接收武器弹药的线路畅通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ojukwu’s Biafra: Relief Corridor, Arms Smuggling, and Broken Diplomacy in the Nigerian Civil War
This article examines the rationale behind, or motivation, for the Biafran head of government, General Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu’s sustained objection both to proposed mercy corridor and daylight relief flights into Biafra by the International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC) despite the prevalent starvation in Biafra during the Nigerian Civil War. Ojukwu’s public justification for his objection to the proposals was that there was a possibility that the Nigerian forces could poison the food and medicine destined to Biafra. He also argued that agreement to daylight flights could expose Biafra to bombardment by Nigerian forces. Surprisingly, some scholars have either ignored this aspect of the conflict or accepted Ojukwu’s claims in their analysis of the relief debates. Using mainly archival sources and interviews, this paper argues that while it may be possible for Biafra’s infrastructure to be attacked by federal forces, Ojukwu’s main reason of objection to the proposals was to keep open the lines through which Biafra was receiving its arms and ammunition from external sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
War & Society
War & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of tocilizumab in hospitalized moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients: a real-life study. Agencies, temporalities, and spatialities in Hiroshima’s post-war reconstruction: a case of reflexive peacebuilding in the Anthropocene? Anomalies in Collective Victimhood in Post-War Japan: ‘Hiroshima’ As a Victimisation Symbol for the Collective National Memory of War The Southern Irish Loyalists Relief Association and Irish Ex-Servicemen of the First World War, 1922–1932 Military welfare history: what is it and why should it be considered?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1